.png "back to home page")
California became the first US state to legislate that bots on platforms like social media will need to self-identify - by their owners and operators. We're not sure how practical this law will be...#bots #socialmedia #california #law #infosechttps://t.co/o3bcV89l74 pic.twitter.com/rKAzyUTgai
— SecurityTrails (@securitytrails) July 5, 2019
Regulations, but for forcing transparency. ?
— Subrahmanyam KVJ (@SuB8u) July 5, 2019
The choice of whether to tell a customer if they are interacting with a human or a bot is no more a choice in California. Not something many companies would appreciate, I'd imagine. https://t.co/RnfeNtGMRy pic.twitter.com/n1GeyRyA6l
California has passes law stating that any bot used to influence a voter or sell a product must identify itself as a bot. This is well meaning but unworkable. How do you define a bot?
— Dare Obasanjo (@Carnage4Life) July 4, 2019
Programmatic access would mean almost every brand & influencer account. https://t.co/E9zzubcXlq
“Just because a statement is ultimately ‘made’ by a robot does not mean that it is not the product of human creation” https://t.co/VoghM9omrf
— Fabio Chiusi (@fabiochiusi) July 4, 2019
I'm happy to see a new bot law pass in California. It requires all bots to identify themselves as bots when commenting or messaging people.
— Mikko Alasaarela | AI ❤ Blockchain (@alasaarela) July 6, 2019
We need to get this implemented everywhere and put an end to the currently widespread deception. #ai #bots https://t.co/0QZHgsBvyr
Thought-provoking piece by @noamcohen in the @NewYorker on legislating #bot "speech" - https://t.co/sZOHYYIJfa
— Guy Hoffman (@guyhoffman) July 5, 2019
"On July 1st, California became the first state in the nation to try to reduce the power of bots by requiring that they reveal their “artificial identity” when they are used to sell a product or influence a voter." https://t.co/tcky2iwHML
— Caille Millner (@caillemillner) July 3, 2019
Interesting analysis in @NewYorker
— Ross Dawson (@rossdawson) July 6, 2019
On July 1st, California became the first state in the nation to try to reduce the power of bots by requiring that they reveal their “artificial identity” when they are used to sell a product or influence a voter.https://t.co/vMEQjxRUKy
Will California’s New Bot Law Strengthen Democracy? | The New Yorker https://t.co/cuqxxbwmOz
— Emilio Ferrara (@emilio__ferrara) July 6, 2019
Will #California’s New #Bot #Law Strengthen #Democracy?
— SpecGhost (@SpecGhost) July 6, 2019
California is the first state to try to reduce the power of #Bots by requiring
that they reveal their“artificial identity”when they are used to sell a product
or influence a voter.#Policy #SocialMedia https://t.co/jDbAKyhXNM
CA to force bots to disclose themselves. https://t.co/tu8yZkwcKR
— Chris Wysopal (@WeldPond) July 6, 2019
California is the first US state to reduce the power of bots by requiring them to reveal their “artificial identity” when used to sell a product or influence a voter. @NewYorker on the new law:https://t.co/1paIGWFZ3w
— First Draft (@firstdraftnews) July 5, 2019
"Will California’s New Bot #Law Strengthen [or at least help defend] #Democracy?" https://t.co/gMURt5Pmus #ethics #internet #tech h/t @rcalo
— Internet Ethics (@IEthics) July 5, 2019
California has passes law stating that any bot used to influence a voter or sell a product must identify itself as a bot. This is well meaning but unworkable. How do you define a bot?
— Dare Obasanjo (@Carnage4Life) July 4, 2019
Programmatic access would mean almost every brand & influencer account. https://t.co/E9zzubcXlq
Regulations, but for forcing transparency. ?
— Subrahmanyam KVJ (@SuB8u) July 5, 2019
The choice of whether to tell a customer if they are interacting with a human or a bot is no more a choice in California. Not something many companies would appreciate, I'd imagine. https://t.co/RnfeNtGMRy pic.twitter.com/n1GeyRyA6l
California law banning bots from pretending to be real people without disclosure https://t.co/GVUxzmAOGC
— ken montenegro (@kmontenegro) July 5, 2019
캘리포니아에서는 일부 봇이 인간 인척하는 것은 이제 불법입니다. https://t.co/hc5SYL7Xi3
— lunamoth (@lunamoth) July 7, 2019
California is the first state to try to reduce the power of bots by requiring that they reveal their “artificial identity” when they are used to sell a product or influence a voter. https://t.co/eG1ZtiVsdz
— The OSINT (@theosint) July 7, 2019
I struggle to understand: what has the requirement that #bots reveal their artifical identity got to do with #FreeSpeech? Am I misreading something here? #botlaw #California ht @bronwynwilliams #AI #Facebook #tech https://t.co/xMkVChU0z6
— Dorothea Baur (@DorotheaBaur) July 7, 2019
Do #AI #Robots have a freedom to be identified, curtailed, and even punished? #ML #Robotics #TechLaw #Legaltech https://t.co/n2p1b8gZEt pic.twitter.com/BSk3fbQFEh
— blingularity (@theblingularity) July 6, 2019
The state, in which little attention is paid to the emphasis on pronunciation, requires the introduction of a new gender type - AIBot #ai https://t.co/JoX2yWy4PL
— K Gavrilenko (@KGavrilenko) July 6, 2019
Progressive or regressive? Anti-bot discrimination or pro-human win? #cleantech #clickclean #trust https://t.co/0Td6aob9bg
— Bronwyn Williams (@bronwynwilliams) July 6, 2019