I love this. They want to merge without reducing competition? Great. Let's not reduce competition. https://t.co/vOA8MPJaIZ

— Sascha ? (@saschasegan) May 29, 2019

i am confusion

kill two birds to make one stone

what is english

make sense of words, please https://t.co/xiSYlIyOBd

— Stefan Constantine (@WhatTheBit) May 29, 2019

The U.S. wants T-Mobile to create a fourth competitor as part of its merger with Sprint https://t.co/96XVCKWNy5

— Bloomberg (@business) May 29, 2019

Seinfeld episode starting to come together? https://t.co/yrNxP3MR07

— modest proposal (@modestproposal1) May 29, 2019

Sprint: we need to be bought by T-Mobile so we can survive

Also Sprint: we are the revolutionary leaders in 5G https://t.co/TPZPeGK0cD

— nilay patel (@reckless) May 30, 2019

DOJ wants T-Mobile, Sprint to lay groundwork for new wireless carrier (with own network) as a condition to approving $26.5 billion merger. Companies continue negotiations with Delrahim. Scoop w/ ⁦⁦@damclaugh⁩ ⁦⁦⁦⁦@MoritzDispatch⁩ https://t.co/iBUk5gcB3c

— Nabila Ahmed (@MsNabilaAhmed) May 29, 2019

DOJ wants T-Mobile, Sprint to lay groundwork for new wireless carrier (with own network) as a condition to approving $26.5 billion merger. Companies continue negotiations with Delrahim. Scoop w/ ⁦⁦@damclaugh⁩ ⁦⁦⁦⁦@MoritzDispatch⁩ https://t.co/iBUk5gcB3c

— Nabila Ahmed (@MsNabilaAhmed) May 29, 2019

Seems counterintuitive to require the creation of a competitor as a condition to the merger - but if they spin up a pure wholesale network as they did in Mexico with Altan, it’d be relatively cheap and a boon for the wireless industry in the US https://t.co/yCxv2IiwIM

— Nicolas Girard (@ngirard) May 30, 2019

This news that the DOJ wants Sprint and T-Mobile to spin out a competitor in order to get their merger approved is a good example of @rohangrey and @NathanTankus' argument that there are ways to fight inflation besides fiscal and monetary policy https://t.co/jKUfeCxImq

— Joe Weisenthal (@TheStalwart) May 30, 2019

“You can merge but only if you start a new fourth carrier to compete with you” is one of the most ludicrous merger conditions ever and I support it fully https://t.co/w3w1Z1HmHH

— nilay patel (@reckless) May 30, 2019

법무부, T-Mobile/스프린트 합병 승인조건으로 새로운 경쟁 통신사 만들기 원해. 이미 FCC, 265억 달러의 합병안 추천. 법무부, T-Mobile/스프린트 합병으로 전국 통신사수 4개에서 3개로 줄어 경쟁이 약화되는 것 염려. 따라서 케이블 업체 중 네번째 통신사 만들기 원해. https://t.co/UYBCPoSaQA

— Wan Ki Choi (@wkchoi) May 29, 2019

Justice Department reportedly wants T-Mobile and Sprint to create a new fourth US carrier to gain merger approval https://t.co/G0bSZhLYf4 pic.twitter.com/JDjb9hPSLe

— The Verge (@verge) May 30, 2019

https://t.co/fa0ZXr4wtq@TheJusticeDept Alright fam how about we let T-mobile and Sprint merge on the condition that $CHTR can merge with $CMCSA and $ATUS to create a fourth mobile carrier. We'll spin off all the content assets just to make things fair Everybody wins!*

— Kyler Hasson (@kylerhasson) May 29, 2019

ICYMI: T-Mobile and Sprint may have to create a new wireless carrier in U.S. https://t.co/uhzDQkVAAz by @lukedormehl pic.twitter.com/uOblhd0sAK

— Cult of Mac (@cultofmac) May 30, 2019

T-Mobile and Sprint may have to create a new wireless carrier in U.S. https://t.co/uhzDQkVAAz by @lukedormehl pic.twitter.com/8bPSi6evUO

— Cult of Mac (@cultofmac) May 30, 2019

ICYMI - T-Mobile and Sprint may have to create a new wireless carrier in U.S. https://t.co/uhzDQkVAAz by @lukedormehl

— Cult of Mac (@cultofmac) May 31, 2019

T-Mobile and Sprint May Have to Create Fourth Competitor to Win Merger Approval https://t.co/8r1V7ODtrw via @gizmodo #mobile #wireless

— Evan Kirstel (@evankirstel) May 30, 2019