The Bitcoin Cash Hardfork - Three Interrelated Incidents [blog.bitmex.com]
Bitcoin Cash Miners Undo Attacker's Transactions With '51% Attack' [www.coindesk.com]
Bitcoin Speed Vs. Altcoins a 'Red Herring,' Says Charlie Shrem - [bitcoinist.com]
BCH May Have Sustained $1.3 Million+ Double Spend: BitMex Research [cointelegraph.com]
Login to comment
1/8 So, here’s the irony and nonsense, pertaining to the SEC and cryptocurrency.— William Mougayar (@wmougayar) May 26, 2019
Suppose you develop an App (or dApp), and use BTC or ETH as your in-app currency for something like buying/selling, earning/spending, etc. So far, so good.
According to @BitMEXdotcom 's research, the network underwent a reorganization of a two-block chain during #BCH hard fork, held on May 15, which resulted in a double spend of 3,392 BCH (about 1.35 million dollars).https://t.co/ahCBzSd3jx pic.twitter.com/eWax7OlI8E— ICO Drops (@ICODrops) May 26, 2019
The Bitcoin Cash Hardfork – Three Interrelated Incidents— BitMEX Research (@BitMEXResearch) May 25, 2019
Analysis of the incidents surrounding the 15 May 2019 Bitcoin Cash hardfork:
* Empty block bug
* Consensus chainsplit
* Coordinated & deliberate 2 block re-org, reversing 3,392 BCH of spendhttps://t.co/FD2NeOedvr pic.twitter.com/VdB0isQyTN
https://t.co/eQjbzwXEHE— Superior Victory (@SuperiorVictor1) May 26, 2019
"Based on our calculations, around 3,392 BCH may have been successfully double spent in an orchestrated transaction reversal."
reorgは今まで散々起きたといいますが、今回のようなダブルスペントもあったのでしょうか？ @23pluton I'm blocked and can't reach him pic.twitter.com/UpynoovA5n
Bitcoin Cash Miners Undo Attacker’s Transactions With ‘51% Attack’ https://t.co/DQiOeRp3Q8— Arndt*GG (@arndt_gg) May 25, 2019
Not possible with $XRP #XRP. And in the same way there could have been a reorg after the Binance hack. Just convince the Chinese mining pools to do so.
No future for Bitcoin and PoW.
Two big #BCH #mining #pools worked together to do a 51% attack, their intentions were 'good' but not everyone agrees with this tactic. What do you think? Is it okay for a pool to have so much power and what about their intentions? https://t.co/aImRjBVNRw #cryptonews #crypto pic.twitter.com/cyGR0tZZ0S— Elite Mining Inc (@EliteMiningInc) May 25, 2019
When will the #fintech media stop glamorizing failures to the point were huge scams are acceptable. Exchanges that have vested interest then block good secure projects from being offered rather than pulling failed blockchains with high fake volume big mess https://t.co/R5EsdIzzkU— Joel A. Bosh (@wizrig) May 26, 2019
This should be unacceptable for a top 10 cryptocurrency! Double spend attacks are very bad. It means the blockchain is vulnerable/unsafe for investors.— The Hodlers ? (@TheHodlers_) May 26, 2019
Think your funds aren’t #SAFU w/ $BCH? Just move to $DGB #DigiByte #MultiAlgo #SleepingGianthttps://t.co/35kNP7fIuk
Login to comment