.png "back to home page")
The fatal weakness of Satoshi's game theory. Miners cooperating. https://t.co/P9oyZpl9BI
— (((Frances Coppola))) (@Frances_Coppola) May 26, 2019
1/8 So, here’s the irony and nonsense, pertaining to the SEC and cryptocurrency.
— William Mougayar (@wmougayar) May 26, 2019
Suppose you develop an App (or dApp), and use BTC or ETH as your in-app currency for something like buying/selling, earning/spending, etc. So far, so good.
According to @BitMEXdotcom 's research, the network underwent a reorganization of a two-block chain during #BCH hard fork, held on May 15, which resulted in a double spend of 3,392 BCH (about 1.35 million dollars).https://t.co/ahCBzSd3jx pic.twitter.com/eWax7OlI8E
— ICO Drops (@ICODrops) May 26, 2019
The Bitcoin Cash Hardfork – Three Interrelated Incidents
— BitMEX Research (@BitMEXResearch) May 25, 2019
Analysis of the incidents surrounding the 15 May 2019 Bitcoin Cash hardfork:
* Empty block bug
* Consensus chainsplit
* Coordinated & deliberate 2 block re-org, reversing 3,392 BCH of spendhttps://t.co/FD2NeOedvr pic.twitter.com/VdB0isQyTN
Some ppl are saying there are 51% and double-spend.
— 은행나무?metanet (@Ginkgo_tree_Kr) May 27, 2019
Check and keep your promise.https://t.co/BtvWlnCLIW
Not looking good for Bch - more research highlights insecure forked network.https://t.co/Qqb54lLRBG
— BitcoinSVChannel (@channelBSV) May 26, 2019
https://t.co/eQjbzwXEHE
— Superior Victory (@SuperiorVictor1) May 26, 2019
"Based on our calculations, around 3,392 BCH may have been successfully double spent in an orchestrated transaction reversal."
reorgは今まで散々起きたといいますが、今回のようなダブルスペントもあったのでしょうか？ @23pluton I'm blocked and can't reach him pic.twitter.com/UpynoovA5n
プルトンさんにこの文を紹介してください。https://t.co/BtvWlnCLIW
— 은행나무?metanet (@Ginkgo_tree_Kr) May 26, 2019
i find it really strange how you were so quick to point out the block reorg on bsv but ignored the reorg + split + double spend on bch. https://t.co/ahmYrVajaV
— Elliot (@AldersonBSV) May 26, 2019
저번에는 빈블록버그 공격에 대한 방어라고 프로해싱채굴자가 피해보게 만든것만 보았었는데...
— 은행나무?metanet (@Ginkgo_tree_Kr) May 26, 2019
이건 도대체 빱코인이 뭔지 너무 의심스럽게 한다.
이번 업데이트가 슈노어+세그윗관련 어떤것이었던것으로 기억하는데,
이 세그윗관련 이슈도 상당할수도 있다는 말인가...https://t.co/BtvWlnCLIW
@TheCryptoconomy
— BitMEX Research (@BitMEXResearch) May 25, 2019
We have tried to dig into this incident. We may have found all 25 TXIDs effected by the 2 block re-org, which spent 3,392 BCH of fundshttps://t.co/FD2NeOedvr
Who has some $BCH ?? https://t.co/OepSjqNBGY
— crypbaron ?? (@crypbaron) May 26, 2019
Stay with $BTC #safu. ABC SV ZP all R trash. If u want use it to earn more $BTC pic.twitter.com/u0puIbT5fh
Reputation already damaged. Maybe you will learn to shut your mouth.
— Elliot (@AldersonBSV) May 26, 2019
Maybe not, so long as you stay on your ship is all that counts.
Lets be honest, the only people who need to update is roger and china. https://t.co/ahmYrVajaV
bitmex blog: the bitcoin cash hardfork – three interrelated incidents https://t.co/oh5ltaKjtL
— crypto retreat (@cryptoretreat) May 25, 2019
Read this analysis of the #Bitcoin Cash hard fork, and the conclusion particularly. More to be discussed in my miners as intermediaries / devs as fiduciaries works. #crypto #blockchain
— Angela Walch (@angela_walch) May 25, 2019
https://t.co/7yzDszj9kN
It would be Very Hard to do this to #DigiByte. There are 5 different mining algorithms which is top level decentralization in Crypto. “Bitcoin Cash Miners Undo Attacker’s Transactions With ‘51% Attack’ | CoinDesk” https://t.co/RBhCwLawFN
— Amon - DigiByte UN (@AmonUnlimited) May 26, 2019
Bitcoin Cash Miners Undo Attacker’s Transactions With ‘51% Attack’ https://t.co/DQiOeRp3Q8
— Arndt*GG (@arndt_gg) May 25, 2019
Not possible with $XRP #XRP. And in the same way there could have been a reorg after the Binance hack. Just convince the Chinese mining pools to do so.
No future for Bitcoin and PoW.
I'm sorry, did someone say btc and bch were decentralised??? #xrp #XRPCommunity it really makes me realise we have bacmed the right horse. Keep on hodling everyone we've got this!https://t.co/Qb1lJq5KUt
— RippleRed (@blockjayne79) May 24, 2019
Two big #BCH #mining #pools worked together to do a 51% attack, their intentions were 'good' but not everyone agrees with this tactic. What do you think? Is it okay for a pool to have so much power and what about their intentions? https://t.co/aImRjBVNRw #cryptonews #crypto pic.twitter.com/cyGR0tZZ0S
— Elite Mining Inc (@EliteMiningInc) May 25, 2019
Bitcoin Cash not quite so decentralised..#xrpc #xrpthestandard https://t.co/1bNTlC8oPy via @CoinDesk
— ???????? ?? (@XRPSteve) May 24, 2019
Two bitcoin cash (BCH) mining pools recently carried out what is known as a 51% attack on the blockchain in an apparent effort to reverse another miner’s transactions. https://t.co/rxdH7xeTtl pic.twitter.com/M9mXBNOJ1t
— Geeknik (•̪̀●́) Labs (@geeknik) May 25, 2019
I’m no expert but I find this against the principles of crypto even if it’s to correct a wrong. #NotImmutable#BitcoinCash Miners Undo Attacker’s Transactions With ‘51% Attack’ https://t.co/bVoUuLL0mX#cryptocurrency #blockchain #fintech #BCH
— Alex Jiménez (@RAlexJimenez) May 25, 2019
I guess people don't care about security and decentralization anymore ? #bchhttps://t.co/PbKKQmOlRJ
— johnkimofficial.com ⚡️Chief LTC Evangelist? (@johnkim77) May 25, 2019
BCASH and BSV = 2 shitcoins controlled by 2 mining poolshttps://t.co/q7c9FLNdA7
— The Crypto Monk ⛩ (@thecryptomonk) May 25, 2019
BTC is the one true bitcoin.
— Arcane Bear (@thearcanebear) May 25, 2019
Maybe @rogerkver will shut up?
No thats unlikely.... but now Bcash is trash is clear for the community. Centralized shitcoin @BitcoinCash #bitcoin vs #bcashhttps://t.co/Zj7Jd5I1ZH
Bitcoin Speed Vs. Altcoins a ‘Red Herring,’ Says Charlie Shrem https://t.co/KCMVk4xBFp
— Charlie Shrem (@CharlieShrem) May 26, 2019
BCH May Have Sustained $1.3 Million+ Double Spend: BitMex Research
— Blockchain Tech Labs (@Blockchain_Labs) May 27, 2019
According to a report released by BitMex Research, 3,392 BCH (over $1.35 million) was double spent after the coin’s hard forkhttps://t.co/RoUtzXAFAJ pic.twitter.com/IM2NoWgxkK
Really? https://t.co/d4Oyfm7tUu
— 1/$Steve Chandler (@KingLutron) May 26, 2019
When will the #fintech media stop glamorizing failures to the point were huge scams are acceptable. Exchanges that have vested interest then block good secure projects from being offered rather than pulling failed blockchains with high fake volume big mess https://t.co/R5EsdIzzkU
— Joel A. Bosh (@wizrig) May 26, 2019
This should be unacceptable for a top 10 cryptocurrency! Double spend attacks are very bad. It means the blockchain is vulnerable/unsafe for investors.
— The Hodlers ? (@TheHodlers_) May 26, 2019
Think your funds aren’t #SAFU w/ $BCH? Just move to $DGB #DigiByte #MultiAlgo #SleepingGianthttps://t.co/35kNP7fIuk
BCH May Have Sustained $1.3 Million+ Double Spend: BitMex Research https://t.co/IW8oag2X9q
— ?CRYPTO MOON? (@manianban) May 26, 2019
Two bitcoin cash (BCH) mining pools recently carried out what is known as a 51 percent attack on the blockchain in an apparent effort to reverse another miner's transactions. https://t.co/Qk8P66lhed @AlyssaHertig reports
— CoinDesk (@coindesk) May 24, 2019