The Christchurch Call and steps to tackle terrorist and violent extremist content [blogs.microsoft.com]
Facebook introduces ‘one strike’ policy to combat abuse of its live-streaming service [techcrunch.com]
Facebook restricts livestreaming in response to New Zealand attacks [thehill.com]
Facebook restricts Live feature, White House snubs call for New Zealand shooting response [www.reuters.com]
White House refuses to sign international statement on online extremism [arstechnica.com]
Q&A: Microsoft President Brad Smith on ‘historic’ international partnership to curb online extremism [www.geekwire.com]
Microsoft and other tech giants form group to counter extremist content online [www.technobuffalo.com]
White House says it won't sign international agreement to combat online extremism [www.nbcnews.com]
Facebook, Google and others join Christchurch Call to curb extremism [www.engadget.com]
Facebook Joins Other Tech Companies to Support the Christchurch Call to Action [newsroom.fb.com]
Microsoft, Google, other tech giants form group to counter extremist content online [www.imore.com]
The “free speech” concerns have always been a load of bullshit. These are businesses making billions off of death threats, unfettered racism and streamed real world violence.
— Sleeping Giants (@slpng_giants) May 15, 2019
What a fucking terrible statement to the world. https://t.co/kbAWeDjC2C
Just landed in Paris, with a busy few days ahead. First, the Christchurch Call to Action meeting, where world leaders & social media companies will meet to take action against violence & hate online. Then, I’ll speak at @VivaTech about restoring trust in the digital world.
— Justin Trudeau (@JustinTrudeau) May 15, 2019
It's laughable that a WH that often characterizes the free press as the "enemy of the people" is suddenly concerned with free speech.
— House Homeland Security Committee (@HomelandDems) May 15, 2019
Let's call this what it is: @realDonaldTrump once again actively choosing to NOT show leadership in combatting extremism. https://t.co/PdfPX8pU36
Restrictions on live streaming for people that violate policies not a bad idea, but still easy for a terrorist to have a backup account that they drop the link into 4Chan just before they go live. https://t.co/cpUntd85rk
— Donie O'Sullivan (@donie) May 15, 2019
Facebook implements 1-strike policy to prevent abuse of live-streaming feature.
— Luca Hammer (@luca) May 15, 2019
If as user violates certain policies like sharing a statement of a terror group without appropriate context, the post gets deleted and the account restricted from going live.https://t.co/qt5Bkx94ys
In choosing not to stand against extremist speech, WH says with a straight face: “We maintain that the best tool to defeat terrorist speech is productive speech”
— Chris Lu (@ChrisLu44) May 15, 2019
They’ve clearly never read their boss’ tweets. #VeryFinePeople https://t.co/GtI7Bu2RQB
Tech industry is working together with government and civil society to address the continued threat of violent extremism. @Google & @YouTube are pleased to sign the Christchurch Call to Action, outlining our commitment and strengthening those partnerships. https://t.co/ahajjCC936
— Kent Walker (@Kent_Walker) May 15, 2019
Microsoft is proud to sign the Christchurch Call and commit to nine concrete steps to fight violent extremist content online. https://t.co/chba2JsmZL
— Brad Smith (@BradSmi) May 15, 2019
When the terrorists are white: https://t.co/ExEpIgAtG6
— REIGN OF TERROR is coming (@attackerman) May 15, 2019
This speaks volumes about who these people are! | White House will not sign on to Christchurch call to stamp out online extremism amid free speech concerns https://t.co/SO7GaN2ZmG
— Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (@esglaude) May 15, 2019
NEW: White House will NOT sign Christchurch call to action, an international pact to stop extremism on social media, amid free speech concerns. https://t.co/tZvOhVIZJs
— Tony Romm (@TonyRomm) May 15, 2019
America refusing to sign the Christchurch Call to Action, a document authored by France and New Zealand (and being signed by the UK/Canada/Australia) calling for governments and big tech to stop the spread of harmful content.
— Danny Boy (@Care2much18) May 15, 2019
Ceding moral leadership to appease white supremacy. https://t.co/VYxGxkq09t
Two months after the New Zealand massacre, FB is adding a policy that bans people from using Facebook Live when they break some rules. It says it would have applied to the shooter. https://t.co/XwHTWKr6Hk
— Heather Kelly (@heatherkelly) May 15, 2019
Who decides what is "terrorist and violent extremist content?"
— Carl Franzen (@carlfranzen) May 15, 2019
So Twitter will try to remove livestreams of lone shooters or homicidal gunmen as fast as possible...What about graphic livestreams and videos of government soldiers firing on citizen protestors (e.g. Sudan)? https://t.co/YNG8bG3Vaw
Translation: We can’t do this because the actual President would be in permanent breach of any international pact to stop extremism on social media. Obvs. https://t.co/UNopD2fgYf
— James O'Brien (@mrjamesob) May 15, 2019
Today @Microsoft, with @amazon, @google, @facebook, and @Twitter, signed the #Christchurch Call to Action. Here are nine steps each company is committing to take: https://t.co/hvpoKXVl6w https://t.co/hvpoKXVl6w
— Microsoft On the Issues (@MSFTIssues) May 15, 2019
Microsoft is proud to sign the Christchurch Call and commit to nine concrete steps to fight violent extremist content online. https://t.co/chba2JsmZL
— Brad Smith (@BradSmi) May 15, 2019
? #Facebook introduces 'one strike' #policy to combat abuse of its live-streaming #service
— DigiMarium CGMS (@digimarium) May 15, 2019
? https://t.co/dzbdp6mgmX
Facebook is learning from Chinese social credit systems https://t.co/6UfO6gtu7D
— Chris Hoofnagle (@hoofnagle) May 15, 2019
This is... something. But a one strike policy doesn’t help with brand new accounts like the one used for the Christchurch livestream. https://t.co/pNqUXToJ87
— Karolin Schwarz (@raeuberhose) May 15, 2019
Facebook restricts Live feature, citing New Zealand shooting | Article [AMP] | Reuters https://t.co/gSK65f2a9R
— Nisthar Cassim (@nisthar_cassim) May 15, 2019
Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft, Amazon and Google commit to nine-point plan against terrorist content online #ChristchurchCall https://t.co/vSw3VhJHj0
— Laura Kayali (@LauKaya) May 15, 2019
Missing from @facebook @microsoft @google @twitter @amazon Nine Point Plan for implementing #ChristchurchCall is any kind of clear commitment to evaluate how their moderation efforts disproportionately silence certain groups & individuals https://t.co/Gp1EQWHJAG
— Emma Llanso (@ellanso) May 15, 2019
The Christchurch Call and steps to tackle terrorist and violent extremist content https://t.co/MmxSFskyl9
— Yusuf Mehdi (@yusuf_i_mehdi) May 16, 2019
Very proud of my former company for signing up for this. https://t.co/Ll3qdNlXoN
— Shawn (@SecCatHerder) May 15, 2019
#Facebook introduces 'one strike' policy to combat abuse of its live-streaming service https://t.co/OkMwr4iUqI via @techcrunch #socialmedia
— Nicolas Le Breton (@LBretonNicolas) May 15, 2019
White House Refuses to Sign International Statement on Online Extremism https://t.co/O6R7bni4Ig
— @ANTIGOPMVMT (@ANTIGOPMVMT) May 16, 2019
This speaks volumes. https://t.co/OCxkJL9nKy
— Amarielle (@AmarielleEU) May 16, 2019
Q&A: Microsoft President Brad Smith on ‘historic’ international partnership to curb online extremism https://t.co/MmxGFOOLM2 via @GeekWire
— Ed Lazowska (@lazowska) May 15, 2019
And in other news, #trump refused to sign an international agreement with allies including the United Kingdom, Japan, Australia, Italy, India, Germany and Spain to combat online extremism ?https://t.co/en4pdkibc1
— Dolphin ? ? Demands Transparency ?????️? (@DolphinDemVoter) May 15, 2019
It is an outrage that the WH will not sign this agreement. Hate speech has no place in our society. It is not a partisan issue: White House says it won't sign international agreement to combat online extremism https://t.co/ww5e7uV5Hi
— Democracy 4 All (@goodbye56789) May 16, 2019
Here’s a fun thought - when you run your government policy to please religious and identity extemists because you their support to stay in power, that resembles what places like Saudi Arabia do.
— Benjamin Franklin ? (@benFranklin2018) May 16, 2019
https://t.co/1MireNbQeG
????#OpResistance #ResistSec #AnonymousHateWatch #Anonymous #AnonFamily #EndHate
— ℂ????/ℂ???- ???? ?? ℝ???????? (@Spanglish_Tea) May 16, 2019
White House says it won't sign international agreement to combat online extremism. https://t.co/7nhOpamA4o vía @nbcnews
White House says it won't sign international agreement to combat online extremism#TrumpExtremism https://t.co/F2Hs2dyG3l
— Stacey ?Jersey Girl? (@StaceyBeeBlue) May 15, 2019
Of course not because Trump could lose parts of his white supremacist base: Trump regime it won't sign international agreement to combat online extremism https://t.co/AVfYJN1py1 via @nbcnews
— (((DeanObeidallah))) (@DeanObeidallah) May 15, 2019
White House says it won't sign international agreement to combat online extremism. https://t.co/g0YqJFTHg3
— D.K.R. Boyd (@ReflectingMan) May 16, 2019
White House Says It Won't Sign International Agreement to Combat Online Extremism https://t.co/Oe7YG8Lhnd
— @ANTIGOPMVMT (@ANTIGOPMVMT) May 15, 2019