.png "back to home page")
Facebook implements 1-strike policy to prevent abuse of live-streaming feature.
— Luca Hammer (@luca) May 15, 2019
If as user violates certain policies like sharing a statement of a terror group without appropriate context, the post gets deleted and the account restricted from going live.https://t.co/qt5Bkx94ys
Restrictions on live streaming for people that violate policies not a bad idea, but still easy for a terrorist to have a backup account that they drop the link into 4Chan just before they go live. https://t.co/cpUntd85rk
— Donie O'Sullivan (@donie) May 15, 2019
Two months after the New Zealand massacre, FB is adding a policy that bans people from using Facebook Live when they break some rules. It says it would have applied to the shooter. https://t.co/XwHTWKr6Hk
— Heather Kelly (@heatherkelly) May 15, 2019
Facebook said it would stop people who have recently posted terrorist propaganda from broadcasting live video on its service https://t.co/IsUn6gIIxw
— SmithCRyan ? (@smithcryan) May 15, 2019
.@PostOpinions #SteveBannon: "We’re in an economic war with #China. It’s futile to compromise." https://t.co/jodqllDVTo
— Citizens of the American Republic (@CitizensAR) May 7, 2019
@realDonaldTrump's prized Doral resort, is in a steep financial decline!
— Jas○n⚓ (@SoZooMe1) May 15, 2019
According to it's own financial records.#BillionDollarLoserDonald
I hope this fake presidency financially destroys the entire #TrumpCrimeFamily#WompWomp https://t.co/R69ee99jVn
McConnell seeking to use disaster aid bill to ensure hemp farms get crop insurance
— MME (@THEMMEXCHANGE) May 14, 2019
https://t.co/u2Z1t9P6ox #MME #Hemp #CBD #insurance @senatemajldr pic.twitter.com/08BUcrDDII
NEW: White House will NOT sign Christchurch call to action, an international pact to stop extremism on social media, amid free speech concerns. https://t.co/tZvOhVIZJs
— Tony Romm (@TonyRomm) May 15, 2019
It's laughable that a WH that often characterizes the free press as the "enemy of the people" is suddenly concerned with free speech.
— House Homeland Security Committee (@HomelandDems) May 15, 2019
Let's call this what it is: @realDonaldTrump once again actively choosing to NOT show leadership in combatting extremism. https://t.co/PdfPX8pU36
America refusing to sign the Christchurch Call to Action, a document authored by France and New Zealand (and being signed by the UK/Canada/Australia) calling for governments and big tech to stop the spread of harmful content.
— Danny Boy (@Care2much18) May 15, 2019
Ceding moral leadership to appease white supremacy. https://t.co/VYxGxkq09t
This speaks volumes about who these people are! | White House will not sign on to Christchurch call to stamp out online extremism amid free speech concerns https://t.co/SO7GaN2ZmG
— Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (@esglaude) May 15, 2019
In choosing not to stand against extremist speech, WH says with a straight face: “We maintain that the best tool to defeat terrorist speech is productive speech”
— Chris Lu (@ChrisLu44) May 15, 2019
They’ve clearly never read their boss’ tweets. #VeryFinePeople https://t.co/GtI7Bu2RQB
The “free speech” concerns have always been a load of bullshit. These are businesses making billions off of death threats, unfettered racism and streamed real world violence.
— Sleeping Giants (@slpng_giants) May 15, 2019
What a fucking terrible statement to the world. https://t.co/kbAWeDjC2C
When the terrorists are white: https://t.co/ExEpIgAtG6
— REIGN OF TERROR is coming (@attackerman) May 15, 2019
Translation: We can’t do this because the actual President would be in permanent breach of any international pact to stop extremism on social media. Obvs. https://t.co/UNopD2fgYf
— James O'Brien (@mrjamesob) May 15, 2019
Wrong decision by White House. Utterly so. https://t.co/kNFP3I1Zy7
— Ben Judah (@b_judah) May 15, 2019
White House Says It Won’t Sign Global Pact for Tougher Measures on Online Extremism https://t.co/mSDYoL9nlW
— Lothar Birkner (@LotharBirkner) May 15, 2019
White House won’t endorse international call to block extremist content online https://t.co/NzfKegBEMu pic.twitter.com/I7cpi7vLK9
— The Verge (@verge) May 15, 2019
Multiple countries and companies are signing the “Christchurch call” to combat online extremism.
— Vox (@voxdotcom) May 15, 2019
The White House says it won’t. https://t.co/ziuCIalnOl
The White House won't join a global pledge to combat online extremism https://t.co/0ySbT5LeAx
— Jeffrey Levin (@jilevin) May 15, 2019
But of course not...
— Forever Logical ? (@ForeverLogical) May 15, 2019
The White House won’t join a global pledge to combat online extremism https://t.co/MURaalt58Y#BeBest
The White House won’t join a global pledge to combat online extremism https://t.co/M2spK1E2J9
— Recode (@Recode) May 15, 2019
… which just goes to show: Trump is #LiterallyHitler.
— Logical Meme (@Logicalmeme) May 15, 2019
The vagueness of the “Christchurch call” is deliberate.
They want to get their foot in the door.
That is step #1. https://t.co/AhimjAd4LQ
Facebook is cracking down on live-streaming with bans for rule breakers - via @techreview https://t.co/drWuLxRShZ
— toomas hendrik ilves (@IlvesToomas) May 16, 2019
Facebook said it would stop people who have recently posted terrorist propaganda from broadcasting live video on its service https://t.co/0vZvkLgKck
— Bojan Tunguz (@tunguz) May 15, 2019
White House Refuses to Sign International Statement on Online Extremism https://t.co/O6R7bni4Ig
— @ANTIGOPMVMT (@ANTIGOPMVMT) May 16, 2019
This speaks volumes. https://t.co/OCxkJL9nKy
— Amarielle (@AmarielleEU) May 16, 2019
That the U.S. is a no-show to the Christchurch Call indicates a shocking lack of concern about the harms perpetuated by the internet, including terrorism. This reinforces the divide between us and the rest of the world.
— Dipayan Ghosh (@ghoshd7) May 16, 2019
Some thoughts w @satariano @nytimes https://t.co/6hzsBmu982
? @POTUS Trump Administration @WhiteHouse Balks at Global Pact to Crack Down on Online Extremism - The New York Times @FightExtremism https://t.co/qop5xyiveH
— Frances Townsend (@FranTownsend) May 15, 2019
We live in a time when the President of the US calls neo-Nazis "very fine people.” & his administration refuses to sign the Christchurch Call, an int’l accord intended to pressure internet platforms to eradicate violent, extremist content & online terror. https://t.co/KLjqdpFQiy
— Rula Jebreal (@rulajebreal) May 15, 2019
In declining to sign the pledge to fight online extremism, the White House said “the best tool to defeat terrorist speech is productive speech.”
— Don Moynihan (@donmoyn) May 15, 2019
Can you think of an example of where Trump engaged in productive speech to defeat terrorist speech?https://t.co/jZFlOgX4Bv
White House won’t endorse international call to block extremist content online https://t.co/NzfKegBEMu pic.twitter.com/1n2lxtTdOc
— The Verge (@verge) May 16, 2019
Y'all are determined to make me throw out my no cursing on Twitter rule.
— Katrina Jones (@Katrina_HRM) May 15, 2019
"White House won’t endorse international call to block extremist content online." https://t.co/hgG7UbjJyI via @Verge
Trump don’t want to lose any of his supporters
— Trell The Acknickulous One (@TrellfromBmore) May 16, 2019
The White House won’t join a global pledge to combat online extremism https://t.co/XGbzL3Co0I
The White House won’t join a global pledge to combat online extremism https://t.co/wouDxqh22w
— Kenny_ANTI_gop (@Hope012015) May 16, 2019
More than a dozen countries, including France, Germany, and the UK — plus tech giants such as Amazon, Facebook, and Google have signed the “Christchurch call.”
— Vox (@voxdotcom) May 16, 2019
The US isn’t among them. https://t.co/qnHFZvTVhx
But of course not...
— Forever Logical ? (@ForeverLogical) May 15, 2019
The White House won’t join a global pledge to combat online extremism https://t.co/MURaalt58Y#BeBest
This feels like when twitter wouldn't put anti-Nazi filters in place b/c they might end up banning too many Republicans.https://t.co/k1u2AXJim9
— Frances_Larina Awareness Month (@Frances_Larina) May 16, 2019
Multiple countries and companies are signing the “Christchurch call.” The US isn’t among them.
— HawkEye 2020? ➳ (@2HawkEye2020) May 15, 2019
The White House won’t join a global pledge to combat online extremism
https://t.co/UPm9VAg0qQ pic.twitter.com/mKLwszGuU3