Facebook Faces a Big Penalty, but Regulators Are Split Over How Big [www.nytimes.com]
The FTC is reportedly divided about how to hold Facebook accountable for privacy lapses [www.theverge.com]
Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis [www.washingtonpost.com]
F.T.C. Wants to Punish Facebook, but the Divided Agency May Go Only So Far https://t.co/LjJIeKLNYk > The chairman appears to have the votes to approve a settlement with a big fine. One of the biggest issues has been whether to hold Mark Zuckerberg liable for future violations
— PrivacyDigest (@PrivacyDigest) May 4, 2019
Don't understand why it can't be a % of revenue for next decade so @Facebook can grow and pay for its misdeeds and Wall Street/Board/Management is reminded of the cost of bad behavior than do a one-time write-off and move on https://t.co/5HXyT8eaev? via @nytimes
— Raju Narisetti (@raju) May 4, 2019
1. Great and apparently well-sourced reporting by @ceciliakang @nytimes on machinations inside @FTC and @facebook over privacy settlement with $$$ penalty & other remedies. Several key points stood out (Thread...) https://t.co/jD0VE1x2kI
— William McGeveran (@BillMcGev) May 4, 2019
If a company’s founder, chairman and CEO who personally controls 60% of voting shares cant be held responsible for the actions of his company, what even is the point of pretending that law and regulations exist https://t.co/UmtWoZIQJP pic.twitter.com/SfNsQAfkTg
— Julia Carrie Wong (@juliacarriew) May 4, 2019
Mark Zuckerberg is in trouble not only for his platform’s censorship, but for mishandling user data. https://t.co/5bTuLsHVi1
— The Columbia Bugle ?? (@ColumbiaBugle) May 4, 2019
Republicans don’t want Zuckerberg held liable for Cambridge Analytica (an arm of the Republican political technology machine). However Dems will be furious if Zuck isn’t held personally liable. Latest on divided FTC settlement talks. https://t.co/NhTHrSbus0
— David Carroll ? (@profcarroll) May 4, 2019
read @ceciliakang on FB+FTChttps://t.co/skF4rwPMWM
— rat king (@MikeIsaac) May 4, 2019
NEW: how the FTC and Facebook got to $5B. Mark Zuckerberg’s liability loomed large in talks: https://t.co/EqaNMcS88v
— CeciliaKang (@ceciliakang) May 4, 2019
Don't understand why it can't be a % of revenue for next decade so @Facebook can grow and pay for its misdeeds and Wall Street/Board/Management is reminded of the cost of bad behavior than do a one-time write-off and move on https://t.co/5HXyT8eaev? via @nytimes
— Raju Narisetti (@raju) May 4, 2019
From @ceciliakang in the @nytimes newsroom: The F.T.C.’s commissioners agreed months ago that they wanted to pursue a historic penalty that would show the agency’s teeth. But now, members are split on the size and scope of @Facebook’s punishment https://t.co/6sUhxHyBQ9
— Privacy Project (@PrivacyProject) May 4, 2019
F.T.C. Wants to Punish Facebook, but the Divided Agency May Go Only So Far https://t.co/LjJIeKLNYk > The chairman appears to have the votes to approve a settlement with a big fine. One of the biggest issues has been whether to hold Mark Zuckerberg liable for future violations
— PrivacyDigest (@PrivacyDigest) May 4, 2019
1. Great and apparently well-sourced reporting by @ceciliakang @nytimes on machinations inside @FTC and @facebook over privacy settlement with $$$ penalty & other remedies. Several key points stood out (Thread...) https://t.co/jD0VE1x2kI
— William McGeveran (@BillMcGev) May 4, 2019
The FTC is reportedly divided about how to hold Facebook accountable for privacy lapses https://t.co/uS6Z3ELDV3 pic.twitter.com/iIHvt6Q9Co
— The Verge (@verge) May 4, 2019
Why would a sitting U.S. President ever discuss such an investigation with the leader of another country, much less the leader of the country that is the subject of the investigation? - The Washington Post - https://t.co/YsCWnv2ICK #TrumpRussia #SaturdayThoughts
— John Lundin ? (@johnlundin) May 4, 2019
Half of the world is bilingual. What’s our problem? | https://t.co/mH3mojM26M https://t.co/4U8cq88jp4 pic.twitter.com/eLhvUZAJ0q
— AATSP (@AATSPglobal) May 2, 2019
FB has put up a fight, "Zuck should not be held legally responsible for the actions of all 35,000 of his employees."
— Scott Galloway (@profgalloway) May 5, 2019
Webster's: "CEO: the highest-ranking person in a company or other institution, ultimately responsible for making managerial decisions."https://t.co/gX4VY2j9mt
Let's make it not a massive one time fine but a perpetual levy and use it to fund local journalism. https://t.co/g4g0r8siWO
— Justin Hendrix (@justinhendrix) May 5, 2019
Facebook needs more than a fine. It needs structural fixes, including spinning WhatsApp and Instagram off. Instead the @FTC seems set to treat Zuck as too big to fail and step back from enforcement that would actually protect our privacy and democracy https://t.co/gApByuoT85
— Demand Progress (@demandprogress) May 4, 2019
The FTC is reportedly divided about how to hold Facebook accountable for privacy lapses https://t.co/RtDtDGa1be #BRCA #ProjectLightHouse #BCSM
— Brave Bosom (@BraveBosom) May 5, 2019
Health-care providers say CDC’s opioid guidelines are harming pain patients - The Washington Post https://t.co/wkKcTNcBLH
— Cathy Kean (@cathy_kean) May 5, 2019