.png "back to home page")
This op-ed appears to run 600 words or so long, but one can boil it down to just five: Please don’t break us up. https://t.co/dAoJHp0pZi
— Greg Greene (@ggreeneva) March 30, 2019
When a large company calls for regulation, what they are really requesting are regulatory costs that serve as barriers to entry, protecting them from upstart competitors. It means nothing else. Ever. https://t.co/qdpzlrZvf7
— Michael Arrington (@arrington) March 31, 2019
Zuckerberg asks to be regulated in four areas: harmful content, election integrity, privacy and data portability. “If we were starting from scratch, we wouldn’t ask companies to make these judgments alone” https://t.co/uvnLSR390w
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) March 30, 2019
“legislation is important for protecting elections ... We believe legislation should be updated to reflect the reality of the threats and set standards for the whole industry.” https://t.co/RImn6jbfKi
— Rob Leathern (@robleathern) March 30, 2019
“Effective privacy and data protection needs a globally harmonized framework” - correct but perhaps overly optimistic? https://t.co/KlRiNk6f78
— Martin Bryant (@MartinSFP) March 30, 2019
Zuckerberg wants regulations. Here are my suggestions for how Facebook should self-regulate https://t.co/uaLiSz2nob
— Josh Constine (@JoshConstine) March 30, 2019
So I see Zuckerberg decided he has a lot of opinions about privacy & regulation lately. https://t.co/Tz3Ao5yFyd
— ? Pinkeee ? (@Elinor_Carmi) March 31, 2019
What he's trying to do is frame the discussion, and make the regulators work for his company.
Missing from the op-ed: BREAKING HIS MONOPOLY (Facebook/Insta/WhatsApp)
tfw you're not capable of fixing the problems you created and have to call an adult for help https://t.co/mRxta1j7JR
— karan ? #BanBillionaires (@karangoel) March 30, 2019
Notice how the behemoths always love uniform or “global” regulations. It’s called protecting one’s monopoly — they’re the only ones who can afford to comply. https://t.co/HThqOlZu9B
— Aaron Klein (@AaronKlein) March 30, 2019
mark Zuckerberg with another editorial in the Washington Post — the ed page Facebook uses to telegraph company thinking to lawmakers
— rat king (@MikeIsaac) March 30, 2019
to get ahead of regulation, MZ sets the agendahttps://t.co/JLbV43JH1v pic.twitter.com/XimO8C36wg
tl;dr, “we’ll be nice! laws are great!please notice we’re saying this and good god pass one that doesn’t actually force us to modify our behavior in any meaningful way”
— Lindsey Barrett (@LAM_Barrett) March 30, 2019
(also transparency reports)https://t.co/p9yHapeZAW
500IQ move by Zuck...
— Tyler Hayes ? bring donuts (@thetylerhayes) March 30, 2019
Cynical take: this would shift future blame of failure away from FB and on to govt (“you set the wrong standards!”)
Optimistic take: FB honestly hates wandering in the dark and getting hate regardless if they turn left or right. The game needs rules https://t.co/w27VVJU4im
First, fight regulation tooth and nail. Then embrace it, and try to pull up the ladder on your competitors. https://t.co/K8ZXRUR8Dz
— Harry Siegel (@harrysiegel) March 30, 2019
Sharing Mark Zuckerberg’s @washingtonpost op-ed laying out four ideas for regulating the internet and working with governments on the right approach https://t.co/uY6YzWhHE7
— Facebook (@facebook) March 30, 2019
Mark Zuckerberg now says he wants to discuss internet regulation with lawmakers around the world. He should start by finally accepting @commonscms invitation, or come to our international grand committee in Ottawa in May to which he’s already been invited. https://t.co/PYjJDnaN8C
— Damian Collins (@DamianCollins) March 30, 2019
“Lawmakers often tell me we have too much power over speech, and frankly I agree. I’ve come to believe that we shouldn’t make so many important decisions about speech on our own.” https://t.co/YlMmv04DBY
— Ian Sherr (@iansherr) March 30, 2019
Cool: support for data portability, transparency reports on content moderation.
— Kevin Bankston (@KevinBankston) March 31, 2019
Shrug: support for privacy regulation on a model FB already follows.
Not cool: support for more content regulation, more intermediary liability, & legally req’d filtering (!)https://t.co/zKNLoR2ipA
I've just written an essay criticizing #Zuckerberg's new self-serving call for regulating the internet. It should be published in a few days. His proposal is in @washingtonpost (behind a firewall), and it's here for free: https://t.co/peUKg8SMTs
— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) March 31, 2019
This is the privacy red herring.
— Bill Fitzgerald (@funnymonkey) March 31, 2019
Privacy isn't about exerting control over how data is used.
Privacy starts with exerting control over when data is collected, and by whom - and a right to not have data collected at all. Other rights flow from there. https://t.co/eBnimJdyYl pic.twitter.com/9etqOarUx9
Rule #5 should be that Mark Zuckerberg doesn’t get to make the rules anymore. Facebook is under criminal and civil investigation. It has shown it cannot regulate itself. Does anyone even want his advice? https://t.co/HoHMZO0Iz6
— David Cicilline (@davidcicilline) March 30, 2019
"I believe we need a more active role for governments and regulators," says Matk Zuckerberg. This is not a message you would have heard from Silicon valley even a few years ago. But government must improve its skills to get it right. https://t.co/BMuGly1ZR4
— Tim O'Reilly (@timoreilly) March 31, 2019
Some thoughts on Mark Zuckerberg's op-ed asking governments across the world to regulate Facebook
— Dare Obasanjo (@Carnage4Life) March 30, 2019
• harmful content is one area it's clear FB can't win. When even governments practice hate speech it's easier to just do whatever's legal vs pleasing no onehttps://t.co/oxrUHUi4eP
"Facebook is a deep-pocketed, well-staffed and mature company. It can take time and effort to make sure its systems are acting in full accordance with privacy regulations in every country." @MikeIsaac https://t.co/GlyqpDgNfl
— Scott Galloway (@profgalloway) March 31, 2019
Mark Zuckerberg’s Call to Regulate Facebook, Explained https://t.co/O9kCX612lO
— John C. Havens (@johnchavens) March 31, 2019
Mark Zuckerberg’s Call to Regulate Facebook, Explained https://t.co/wlInKAUY1e
— Opinion Sphere (@opinionsphere) March 31, 2019
Zuckerberg Calls for New Global Internet Regulations. 1st FB & MrZ pushes the envelope of squashing privacy & now we're calling for Global restraint. Could the ploy be coming home to roost? https://t.co/rTtq9U7TwT
— Auglaize.CO (@AuglaizeCo) March 31, 2019
#Zuckerberg also saying we need comprehensive regulation of digital media companies means we are at a tipping point. We need this to happen, & we need it NOT to be controlled by corps like #Facebook or lobbying orgs like #EFF https://t.co/hp3ouJh3J2
— David Golumbia (@dgolumbia) March 31, 2019
米連邦法・州法の鉄線スパゲッティ状況に悩んだデータブローカーが連邦包括プライバシー法の制定を求めているのと似た事態になってきたとも言えるかもしれません。/Facebook's Zuckerberg Calls for Global Internet Regulations https://t.co/DDJWBXVVj1
— 生貝直人 / Naoto Ikegai (@ikegai) March 31, 2019
This is a WORLDWIDE ATTACK on FREE SPEECH ACROSS THE GLOBE ?!!! https://t.co/6zWdbMDBTr
— Italians For Trump (@Italians4Trump) March 30, 2019
Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg proposing changes to rules governing the Internet, calling for new regulations governing harmful content, election integrity, privacy and data portability https://t.co/KHT0Vge0Hq vía @technology
— John Müller (@cultrun) March 31, 2019
Start at home Zuck, being greedy turned you from being an SOB to being a traitor. https://t.co/vUFz20MU2d
— Barbara Malmet (@B52Malmet) March 30, 2019
Facebook's Zuckerberg Calls for New Global Internet Regulations https://t.co/XntXgThEtY
— ari (@innear) March 30, 2019
Facebook's Zuckerberg Calls for New Global Internet Regulations https://t.co/82LMO0S7kN
— Jeffrey Levin (@jilevin) March 30, 2019
Just in: Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg goes full jack wagon, RIGHT NOW, and say’s we beed Internet Regulations and Rules: (hell of some timing here marky mark...) #QAnon
— MAGA Moguls??❤️ (@MagaMoguls) March 30, 2019
Facebook's Zuckerberg Calls for New Global Internet Regulations https://t.co/nV44DHmw8g
Those who are wanting government intervention...careful what you wish for
— SayScape? No #Censorship No #bias (@SayScape) March 30, 2019
"Zuckerberg said the company is seeking regulations that would set baselines for prohibited content and require companies to build systems for keeping harmful content to a minimum."https://t.co/QMLmOqpbo5
#Facebook's Zuckerberg Calls for New Global Internet Regulations https://t.co/Cqn8jJfZq3#Privacy #pii #cookies #marketing #eu #gpdr #surveillance #tracking #monitoring #profiling #persona #UserData #Privacy #pii #cookies #marketing #surveillance #tracking #monitoring
— Rich Tehrani (@rtehrani) March 30, 2019
Nos tiene donde nos tiene y ahora dice qué hay que hacer / Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg proposing changes to rules governing the Internet, calling for new regulations governing harmful content, election integrity, privacy and data portability https://t.co/ru5ZmGYElL
— Pablo Fonseca Q. (@pfonsecaq) March 30, 2019
Mark Zuckerberg joins Tim Cook in calling for GDPR-like privacy regulation in the US https://t.co/qLomXvh03z #privacy #gdpr #apple #facebook #law #CyberSecurity pic.twitter.com/nK8As65k7t
— Bob Carver (@cybersecboardrm) March 31, 2019
페이스북 마크 저커버그, 인터넷 규제 위한 4가지 방식 제안
— Wan Ki Choi (@wkchoi) March 31, 2019
- 정부들, 온라인 콘텐트 기준 설정
- 유해 콘텐트의 플랫폼 도달 기회를 최소화하는 필터링
- 정치 광고 광고주를 확인하기 위한 "공공기준" 설정
- 서비스간 데이터 휴대성 보장(예: 데이터 트랜스퍼 프로젝트) https://t.co/qhK1qPJxJE
Zuckerberg says governments & regulators rather than private companies like Facebook should be more active in policing the Internet.
— Obi_Obvi ⚡️?⚡️ (@ObiObvi) March 31, 2019
Really, Zuckerberg? You fuked up, not us. You need to be under watch. Stop projecting! ? https://t.co/oQ7OzybV07
“차라리 나를 규제해 주세요.”
— Goodhyun 김국현 (@goodhyun) April 1, 2019
①비난 속에서 논점을 사회나 정부 등 다른 차원으로 옮기는 효과.
②그 규제가 진입장벽을 만드는 효과.
규제는 당연 기업활동에는 벽이지만, 벽은 보호막이 되어주기도. https://t.co/hW9L7sM7XY
Zuckerberg’s call for more tech rules fails to impress https://t.co/kLyl4tsY69
— Financial Times (@FT) March 31, 2019
Mark Zuckerberg’s calls for more regulation of Facebook and other internet companies have been met with scepticism among politicians and privacy campaigners, as US lawmakers weigh up how to legislate big technology groups https://t.co/dfDtfXlf0W
— Robert Went (@went1955) March 31, 2019
If people were economically literate, they wouldn't fall for this "responsibility" rhetoric. (Same for this journalist.) This is a corporation seeking to use politics, instead of good business practice, to protect its profits from future competitors.https://t.co/WwD5R2yZNi
— Per Bylund (@PerBylund) April 1, 2019
Zuckerberg is right. Tech companies must be accountable for safeguarding against violent extremists & foreign adversaries. There must be strict legal limits on how platforms use our data. It’s time for Congress to set clear & commonsense rules. https://t.co/UTHmluoQod
— Richard Blumenthal (@SenBlumenthal) March 31, 2019
Mark Zuckerberg’s Call to Regulate Facebook, Explained.
— Ste Davies (@stedavies) April 1, 2019
The piece is suggesting Facebook is trying to set its own terms for what any regulations should look like.
https://t.co/qu75Um8PR2
Regulation as a barrier to entry, Facebook edition: https://t.co/rZXConjjWz pic.twitter.com/psFAABJIuj
— Peter G. Klein (@petergklein) April 1, 2019
This is a man who gives a Zuck about breaking his own country’s laws & governance mechanism, won’t testify in front of the U.K. parliament, enables genocide, racism, bullying & profits off of all of the ads sponsored to tear the fabric of our society https://t.co/fSjxvgdPC2
— Maya Zehavi (@mayazi) March 30, 2019
Govt regulation of the Internet has been a longtime goal that not even the "war on terror," ISIL and the rest could achieve. Turns out all that was needed was liberal-left panic over Russia, fake news, and white supremacy.* https://t.co/6izoZ3SZH6
— Branko Marcetic (@BMarchetich) March 31, 2019