.png "back to home page")
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/63290173/acastro_190218_1777_apple_streaming_0003.0.jpg)
Apple’s original TV shows reportedly won’t be free — plus $9.99 for HBO, Starz, Showtime https://t.co/VX2XikMsWf pic.twitter.com/BUPTR7fALV
— The Verge (@verge) March 24, 2019
"Apple’s original TV shows reportedly won’t be free — plus $9.99 for HBO, Starz, Showtime." I'll reserve judgement but this is no Netflix killer. Not even close. My cable deal gives me HBO and Showtime for free. https://t.co/NTbsbuRnTD
— Michael Gartenberg (@Gartenberg) March 24, 2019
WSJ: 애플이 스타즈, 쇼타임, HBO TV 및 뉴스의 각 구독 서비스 당 월 $9.99 받을 것. 이는 내일 애플 특별 이벤트 전에 확인된 것. 애플, 미래에 많은 스마트 TV 세트에 자사 TV 앱을 제공하기 위해 협상하고 있어. 애플 직원들, 새로운 TV 서비스를 "넷플릭스 킬러"로 설명. https://t.co/bsze5vRs2X
— Wan Ki Choi (@wkchoi) March 24, 2019
단언컨데 현재 리크 대로라면 이번 이벤트는 스티브 잡스 사후 최고로 노잼일듯. 일단 우리나라엔 해당사항이 없음...https://t.co/iQqGjdadye
— 푸른곰 (@purengom) March 24, 2019
“They were freaked out." Apple executives knew they needed to write a new chapter. Can video and news be the answer? https://t.co/qnCmk48vGs
— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) March 24, 2019
Not mentioned in this article is Amazon and Hulu charge $10.99 for Showtime and $14.99 for HBO. That would take people away like me to save a little money on those. https://t.co/WBCvlVsgnM
— JP Myers (@LAJP) March 24, 2019
Apple the services company that tracks what apps are successful in the App Store so it can build competing products does not look so different than Facebook selling a VPN to track competing social networks or Amazon doing AmazonBasics
— nilay patel (@reckless) March 24, 2019
Apple birthed the smartphone app with the invention of the iPhone and App Store. But some apps have become so successful they are now among Apple's biggest threats to the iPhone business.
— Scott Austin (@ScottMAustin) March 24, 2019
Apple is now striking back.
By @trippmickle https://t.co/vmkZWBMm7G
WSJ: Apple talking with Starz, HBO, Showtime to offer their programming for $9.99 in new its new subscription TV app set to be announced Monday. Apple is also negotiating deals with smart TV makers and Roku to get the service on those platforms as well. https://t.co/C8tfQO1l9O
— Steve Kopack (@SteveKopack) March 24, 2019
WSJ reporting sources telling them Apple has switched its thinking and now plans to charge for original programming — Apple has always planned to charge down the road but original plans were to give away programming for free. What Apple says Monday will be newsy. https://t.co/mvjT9FTivU
— Alex Sherman (@sherman4949) March 24, 2019
“They built an organization to make beautiful gadgets." The iPhone made Apple, but it's running out of juice. What's next? A new TV app, dubbed internally as the Netflix killer, and a revamped News app. https://t.co/aiB09gie8R
— Tripp Mickle (@trippmickle) March 24, 2019
This story talks about Apple's $1 billion budget "to buy dozens of original TV shows." It talks about news. It talks about apps. It doesn't talk about sports rights. Not once. Good story by @trippmickle. https://t.co/0AsqTD9V1E
— John Ourand (@Ourand_SBJ) March 24, 2019
“After a 2015 effort to persuade Walt Disney Co. and others to join a streaming-TV service faltered, Apple’s executives debated alternatives, including acquiring Walt Disney Co. or Netflix, and building its own studio, people familiar with the discussions said.” https://t.co/iBcDatORRi
— Eric Jackson (@ericjackson) March 24, 2019
"Apple’s original TV shows reportedly won’t be free — plus $9.99 for HBO, Starz, Showtime." I'll reserve judgement but this is no Netflix killer. Not even close. My cable deal gives me HBO and Showtime for free. https://t.co/NTbsbuRnTD
— Michael Gartenberg (@Gartenberg) March 24, 2019
Apple should offer "HBO Premium" that only works on wireless headphones and costs $80 a month https://t.co/GiAYDWdYvk
— Casey Newton (@CaseyNewton) March 24, 2019
This is exactly the sort of data tracking that Amazon does and which @ewarren wants to break tech companies up over pic.twitter.com/Otqtz6uJTu
— nilay patel (@reckless) March 24, 2019
Tim Cook began pushing the services strategy hard in late 2017. The iPhone X was boosting revenue but Apple wasn't selling more phones. The CEO began meeting monthly w/ the services division, peppering it w/ probing Qs he had used to create Apple's first-class operations division
— Tripp Mickle (@trippmickle) March 24, 2019
Apple could charge $9.99 per month each for HBO, Showtime and Starz https://t.co/LBtCSGLSJh
— Romain Dillet ? (@romaindillet) March 24, 2019
Apple’s streaming plans have been cloaked in characteristic secrecy. Can the iPhone maker delve into the streaming video market — and can it dominate in the crowded and fast-growing arena? https://t.co/0WQi1Zdboy
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) March 24, 2019
Read more from @rfaughnder and @thewendylee on Apple’s streaming strategy https://t.co/0WQi1Zdboy
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) March 24, 2019
Filmmakers have complained that its cautious approach to content could hinder its ability to compete. And while Apple is a clear leader when it comes to consumer products, entertainment production is a relatively new business for the company. https://t.co/0WQi1Zdboy
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) March 24, 2019
But people familiar with the effort say Apple’s Hollywood foray has suffered from inevitable growing pains and exposed a culture clash between Silicon Valley and the legacy studio business. https://t.co/0WQi1Zdboy
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) March 24, 2019
The tech giant has spent the last two years securing deals with show business royalty to create a lineup of programming to compete with Netflix, Amazon and Disney. And there is intense pressure on Apple to deliver. https://t.co/0WQi1Zdboy
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) March 24, 2019
The company is expected to finally provide answers Monday when Chief Executive Tim Cook pitches Apple’s new streaming video strategy to a crowd of celebrities and studio executives. https://t.co/0WQi1Zdboy
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) March 24, 2019
This makes far more sense:
— Mike Dudas (@mdudas) March 25, 2019
"The available @WSJ content will include general ‘news, politics and lifestyle’ but business and finance news will be de-prioritized. The Journal is apparently hiring more reporters to feed content into the Apple News offering"https://t.co/4CZ3EzCVyP
애플이 스트리밍 서비스를 개시하고 HBO, 쇼타임, 스타즈와 제휴하여 각 월 $9.99 요금으로 콘텐츠를 제공할 것이라고…https://t.co/oa4xAaiJdG
— H. Kim (@metavital) March 25, 2019
WSJ details how Tim Cook steered Apple towards Services since 2014, confirms $9.99/mo each for Starz/Showtime/HBO TV and News https://t.co/HlhzaL3FkO pic.twitter.com/sGNOfTk4F2
— Rich Tehrani (@rtehrani) March 24, 2019
Apple could charge $9.99 per month each for HBO, Showtime and Starz https://t.co/SuWYeIZzaq in @TechCrunch pic.twitter.com/LdBv3AJjMN
— HealthIT Policy (@HITpol) March 24, 2019
Apple could charge $9.99 per month each for HBO, Showtime and Starz https://t.co/0UObfCKEp5 pic.twitter.com/WrJfuHuibh
— Eric Rodgers (@ericfrodgers) March 24, 2019
Early missteps, curious to see how it all pans out. Doubt I have anymore room in my media universe. Everybody has one and it’s finite. https://t.co/0MsOKtyTRS
— G O L D I E. (@goldietaylor) March 24, 2019