Apple Watch accurately spotted heart condition 34% of the time in study [arstechnica.com]
Access to this page has been denied. [www.investors.com]
results and debate [www.cnbc.com]
Your Apple Watch Might Help Spot Dangerous A-Fib [www.webmd.com]
Apple Study Bodes Well For Makers Of Wearable Heart Monitors https://t.co/QVCT4RxV2A $AAPL $IRTC $BEAT via @IBDinvestors
— ivanhoff (@ivanhoff2) March 19, 2019
The best summation of Apple's heart study I've seen, from +@chrissyfarr's interview of Bimal Shah: The Apple Watch appears to be “moderately good for a screening tool, but not amazing.” https://t.co/ijLkJuF7P0
— Matt Rosoff (@MattRosoff) March 18, 2019
As I like to call it the 'Check-Engine Light' for the body is getting closer. Of 419K #AppleHeartStudy participants ~0.5% received a notification about an irregular heartbeat,~1/3rd confirmed. Debate & analysis from @ChrissyFarr @CNBC #DigitalHealth #ACC19 https://t.co/G7VL8k01A8
— Daniel Kraft, MD (@daniel_kraft) March 19, 2019
Apple's VP of health Sumbul Desai talks to @CNBC about the company's efforts to move into the medical sector: "We’re doing it with a thoughtful approach, as we know it’s a new space...(and) we want to hear about all the positives and all the negatives." https://t.co/E275qhch3x
— Christina Farr (@chrissyfarr) March 18, 2019
#Apple #heart #research #study #signals a new era of #medicine , and #doctors are debating the results - nearly 420 k #patient participants but #medical #community questions if more #health #data loaded into #database software development is better data https://t.co/oP8ypTYG7D
— Ayoka Systems (@ayokasystems) March 19, 2019
“Apple's groundbreaking heart study signals a new era of medicine, and doctors are debating the results” via @chrissyfarr #digitalhealth https://t.co/KAtVPFabQ8
— Eugene Borukhovich (@HealthEugene) March 18, 2019
Here it is: I talked to Apple, the steering committee, the investigators and a dozen outside cardiologists for our deep dive into the Apple Heart study — and what it means for the future of medicine https://t.co/E275qhch3x
— Christina Farr (@chrissyfarr) March 18, 2019
Apple isn’t representing the Apple Heart Study as a be all, end all. It’s a first step for a company that needs to now be committed to medical research/transparency, if it wants to win over doctors.
— Christina Farr (@chrissyfarr) March 18, 2019
Health is changing the culture of Apple https://t.co/E275qhch3x
Interesting new research out on Apple’s ECG watch. 34 per cent of people who acted on the Watch’s alert were confirmed to have AF. This tech will soon be coming to the UK https://t.co/xPkvKgT3Ms
— Harry Aagaard Evans (@HarryAEvans) March 18, 2019
Apple's groundbreaking heart study signals a new era of medicine, and doctors are debating the results. https://t.co/qyYqN9gLAv by @chrissyfarr
— Michael Sagner, MD (@MichaelSagnerMD) March 18, 2019
In an interview with @CNBC's @chrissyfarr, @Livongo Chief Medical Officer Dr. Bimal Shah called the preliminary results of the Apple Heart Study, “moderately good for a screening tool, but not amazing.” Read the full story here: https://t.co/4hmtWQr2VM
— Livongo (@Livongo) March 18, 2019
Is technology like the Apple Watch the future of cardiology research? The #AppleHeartStudy takes one of the first major looks at using this technology - but alot of follow up studies are still neeeded #biom4180 https://t.co/M37EWuqicn
— Bronte Kerrigan (@bronte4180) March 19, 2019