.png "back to home page")
트위터 개인 정보 보호 정책 업데이트 관련 트위터 블로그 포스트
— lunamoth (@lunamoth) November 30, 2021
정책 위반 항목에 아래 추가
NEW: media of private individuals without the permission of the person(s) depicted.
Expanding our private information policy to include media https://t.co/b48tqHdbPR
Beginning today, we will not allow the sharing of private media, such as images or videos of private individuals without their consent. Publishing people's private info is also prohibited under the policy, as is threatening or incentivizing others to do so.https://t.co/7EXvXdwegG
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) November 30, 2021
There's a lot of questions & confusion about the new #privacy rules.
— Leia (@TheSWPrincess) November 30, 2021
Read the entire blog post, it provides clarification & examples of what is & isn't allowed.
Public info & public figures are okay.
Posting a private phone # is NOT allowed. THREADhttps://t.co/liJxoK8Irv pic.twitter.com/4Zko9MGkls
Twitter's new rule banning media would mean that the videos from Kenosha involving kyle rittenhouse would be banned
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) November 30, 2021
journalism is largely banned on twitter basicallyhttps://t.co/8cToPsPkuq
The new policy can be read here: https://t.co/kty94L43pX
— Andy Ngô ?️? (@MrAndyNgo) November 30, 2021
Thank you .@TwitterSafety team, and .@paraga for the same. The following was a much needed step. Earlier, someone who belongs to the family of an alleged criminal used my images without my consent. Now this step will bring some peace. Thanks @Twitter ❤️
— Rudrabha Mukherjee ?? (@imrudrabha) November 30, 2021
[https://t.co/68Z9SuqdIM]
Twitter now prohibits" media of private individuals without the permission of the person(s) depicted."
— Sisyphus Idaho (@Sisyphus43) November 30, 2021
I have questions. Bazillions of them. Like that can't prevent me from posting this taken in the public square at a public protest? It just can't. https://t.co/WzaqJy7wby pic.twitter.com/WgY72Jgwsx
Expanding our private information policy to include media https://t.co/miqjcXOMHk
— LoulouD (@maccadoo8) November 30, 2021
It seems @TwitterDublin doesn't allow doxxing of private accounts. Notice to #Websummit CEO!
Twitter said the new “no private media” policy is inapplicable to public figures when the tweet is for “public interest” or adds value to “public discourse”
— Jane Manchun Wong (@wongmjane) November 30, 2021
But how’d they define “private media”? Who is a “public figure”? What is “public discourse”?https://t.co/NRqsMCwtUG https://t.co/4dwjMJ3dVU pic.twitter.com/HXaVKzzAgV
New CEO, new rules. Twitter bans sharing images or videos of private individuals without their consent as part of update to doxxing policy.
— Dare Obasanjo (@Carnage4Life) November 30, 2021
So you can now issue DMCA style takedown requests of photos of you on Twitter. Enforcement is going to be wild.https://t.co/LNmvER76WO
Here is the information. Expanding our private information policy to include media https://t.co/YnlYFmhbMK
— ?Ashley (@AshleyK924) November 30, 2021
Any journalist wanna weigh in on what this means for journalism? https://t.co/hvJfQBNgFb
— Chris Vanderveen (@chrisvanderveen) November 30, 2021
Twitter is expanding its censorship to media, basically making it impossible to film all the antifa rioters and criminals and far left wing groups who complain they are being filmed. The whole purpose of twitter, reporting - is now banned https://t.co/Sy9LfSNZAZ https://t.co/fE2pZKVfyA
— Ron M. (@Jewtastic) November 30, 2021
I was about to say…@Twitter just basically canceled vigilante reporting.@jack knew and the fact that he went out of his way to publicly endorse this new leadership says a whole lot about him.
— Alex B. (@bergealex4) November 30, 2021
You won’t see me cheerlead whatever else he decides to work on. https://t.co/iBGg6vNZft
what does this mean for videos of police misconduct? https://t.co/3KCr0Hb4oL
— emily wilder (@vv1lder) November 30, 2021
figures that I write something complimentary about Twitter policy and the next day they unveil an unworkable, easily abused rule that conflicts w/ the fundamental nature of the platform. https://t.co/klC989CRsW
— Emerson T. Brooking (@etbrooking) November 30, 2021
will just add my voice to the people saying this feels broad and vague enough to be almost nonsensical https://t.co/52HGQXYXta
— Charlie Warzel (@cwarzel) November 30, 2021
I don't think Twitter should be deciding what is in the public interest or not themselves https://t.co/yFrUkXcpKX pic.twitter.com/C38H2TYhRp
— Joseph Cox (@josephfcox) November 30, 2021
Cool. New rules just dropped to selectively enforce. https://t.co/yA0aVzu5sG
— Frank J. Fleming (@IMAO_) November 30, 2021
New CEO, new rules. Twitter bans sharing images or videos of private individuals without their consent as part of update to doxxing policy.
— Dare Obasanjo (@Carnage4Life) November 30, 2021
So you can now issue DMCA style takedown requests of photos of you on Twitter. Enforcement is going to be wild.https://t.co/LNmvER76WO
this seems ... poorly thought out
— Evan Greer (@evan_greer) November 30, 2021
how long before cops try to abuse this to get videos of brutality taken down? i can think of a dozen other similar abusive examples off the top of my head... i get the intention but seems like kind of a mess without more specifics https://t.co/BQqGatN4Fu
This is scary. But the upside is that it could be the final boost of energy needed to enable a Twitter replacement. So if you'd been thinking of creating a Twitter replacement, this could be the time. https://t.co/ZcHvJ76ipx
— Paul Graham (@paulg) November 30, 2021
No more journalism guys https://t.co/y6Ox9wl7eh
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) November 30, 2021
Unless this applies to #NFTs this is more fake bullshit #RightClickVictim https://t.co/o3EDW84z46
— Will ? Menaker (@willmenaker) November 30, 2021
We will take into consideration whether the image is publicly available and/or is being covered by journalists—or if a particular image and the accompanying Tweet text adds value to the public discourse—is being shared in public interest or is relevant to the community.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) November 30, 2021
Read the new Twitter rules on sharing images/video of private individuals. My reading of this would mean it would bar videos like the killing of George Floyd.
— Alyssa Farah Griffin (@Alyssafarah) November 30, 2021
If this is the case, the ONLY good that comes from Twitter - exposing injustice - is now bannedhttps://t.co/6PwERv8rkV https://t.co/VpwHz6WS9i
To be clear, we require a first-person report of the photo/video in question (or from an authorized representative). After we receive a report, that particular media will be reviewed before any enforcement action is taken.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) November 30, 2021
Let’s unpack what this means.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) November 30, 2021
This policy update will help curb the misuse of media to harass, intimidate, and reveal the identities of private individuals, which disproportionately impacts women, activists, dissidents, and members of minority communities.
There are very real trust & safety issues around posting photos of people to try to kick up brigades. But at the same time, implementing this policy requires deep analysis of what’s actually happening in a given thread or it’ll be over-broad. https://t.co/y5Oennssxw
— Renee DiResta (@noUpside) November 30, 2021
"This @policy is not applicable to media featuring public figures or individuals when media & accompanying Tweet text are shared in the public interest or add value to public discourse."
— Alex Howard (@digiphile) November 30, 2021
Who decides who "media" are, @Twitter?
Or if photos taken of people in public "add value?" https://t.co/fhMR8WZvuh
Images/videos that show people participating in public events (like large scale protests, sporting events, etc.) would generally not violate this policy.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) November 30, 2021
For more on what is NOT in violation, read the full policy here:https://t.co/plPa5TgEnM
So, if I want to post a pic of my parents on their anniversary or just looking cute, I have to get their permission. But, how would @TwitterSafety know this? ?? https://t.co/CT6WeUjp9I
— MoneybaggHo (@KirkWrites79) November 30, 2021
A lot of the weirdo accounts bout to go missing https://t.co/zbba1Q2MB0
— Hell DeBarge (@KyriacosONYX) November 30, 2021
You’ve no way to enforce it, no commitment to not favoring the powerful, and “private individuals” is going to be an interesting gambit considering you’re verification process is opaque , racist, xenophobic and arbitrary https://t.co/HQ15Y1738c
— ?Sydette Cosmic Dreaded Gorgon ?? (@Blackamazon) November 30, 2021
Beginning today, we will not allow the sharing of private media, such as images or videos of private individuals without their consent. Publishing people's private info is also prohibited under the policy, as is threatening or incentivizing others to do so.https://t.co/7EXvXdwegG
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) November 30, 2021
Sharing images is an important part of folks' experience on Twitter. People should have a choice in determining whether or not a photo is shared publicly. To that end we are expanding the scope of our Private Information Policy. ?
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) November 30, 2021
Context matters. Our existing private information policy includes many exceptions in order to enable robust reporting on newsworthy events and conversations that are in the public interest.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) November 30, 2021
This seems like a nearly impossible standard to meet. I understand the thinking behind this, but it seems likely to lead to a lot of questionable takedowns. https://t.co/pK55jZvRLA
— Mike Masnick (@mmasnick) November 30, 2021
Theoretically this is great, but how do you enforce this? This seems like the easiest tool for trolls to abuse. It’s like DMCA takedowns where they act first and people get their content taken down for no reason and it takes weeks/ months to fight it. https://t.co/2TNz7QaS5I
— Nate Igor Smith (@drivenbyboredom) November 30, 2021
How does Twitter define "private" images though? They say it also doesn't apply to public figures or things that are "newsworthy," so I'm unclear a) how the rules are defined and b) how they'll even be enforced? https://t.co/VyzmNiAQ3f
— FalconWizard (@ECrumrine) November 30, 2021
While the intent of the policy is good, its wording has led to confusion about what is actually banned, and some free speech experts worry it will make it harder to share newsworthy videos and photos on Twitter. https://t.co/8PFz7NcyY5
— VICE (@VICE) November 30, 2021
NEW: Twitter is changing its policies to ban users from sharing pictures and videos of people without their permission.
— Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai (@lorenzofb) November 30, 2021
Several free speech and journalism experts are worried because the policy is too broad. https://t.co/O1ysULWWnm
This is an unworkable policy. Obviously.
— Bret Weinstein (@BretWeinstein) November 30, 2021
Of course, it is beautifully constructed to allow Twitter to protect its friends and punish/hobble others with *selective enforcement* all while pretending to be impartial and interested only in the "safety" of the community. https://t.co/lWNoc5Mpu5
Twitter bans sharing images or videos of private individuals without their consent.
— tage (@ulonnaya) November 30, 2021
I’d love to see how this is gonna work. https://t.co/4toKWF9ekr
So @Twitter is now saying: the purest form of journalism- the investigative format where veracity is unimpeachable as the information exposed comes straight from the subjects themselves- will be removed on an ad hoc basis by a self anointed digital ministry of truth. How quaint?♂️ https://t.co/1mHnIuPrye
— Matthew Tyrmand (@MatthewTyrmand) November 30, 2021
More excuses to protect leftists and censor conservatives. https://t.co/yNdmqbQv3K
— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) November 30, 2021
Twitter just made this clarification (which they strangely forgot to include in the post announcing the policy) but caveats it as applying "generally" to "large-scale protests" -- so we'll have to see how that works in practice ? https://t.co/TYU8gHALSd
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) November 30, 2021
Web 2.0 is accelerating into a sad place...MetaBookFace can't buy Giphy and Twitter says you can't share pictures of strangers https://t.co/3AXYOu0L7H..
— DAOward (@howardlindzon) November 30, 2021
This tweet serves as me asking for permission forever to share pictures of any of you.
Thanks. $twtr $fb
With this kind of subjectivity, what could possibly go wrong? "This policy is not applicable to media featuring public figures or individuals when media and accompanying Tweet text are shared in the public interest or add value to public discourse." https://t.co/rhjZ2TphTV
— Benjamin Weingarten (@bhweingarten) November 30, 2021
You can tell this policy was written by a "safety & inclusion officer" in an afternoon without any thought given to how pointless and ridiculous it would be to try and police this sort of thing. https://t.co/UMZ2hiF8Et pic.twitter.com/5YWClSexZz
— ASK ABOUT MY NEW YOUTUBE CHANNEL (@VitoGesualdi) November 30, 2021
"This policy update will help curb the misuse of media to harass, intimidate, and reveal the identities of private individuals, which disproportionately impacts women, activists, dissidents, and members of minority communities."
— Chad Loder (they/them) (@chadloder) December 1, 2021
This policy is already harming those exact people. https://t.co/SPhYsYj3Rl
This is a major development:
— Amy Siskind ?️? (@Amy_Siskind) November 30, 2021
"Twitter has expanded its private information policy to include media, banning users from sharing photos or videos of a private individual without their permission." https://t.co/zhkv0s0sL9
트위터, 사용자가 동의 없이 개인의 사적 사진, 동영상 공유하는 것 금지, 사생활 침해, 위해 방지 차원. 정책 위반 사진, 동영상 신고시 삭제 조치
— lunamoth (@lunamoth) November 30, 2021
Twitter bans sharing 'private' images and videos without consent | Engadget https://t.co/lOjDGLezzJ
Twitter bans sharing 'private' images and videos without consent | Engadget https://t.co/6XspRVtV2c
— MzGags (@MzGags) November 30, 2021
Twitter、ユーザの個人情報保護の範囲を拡大。投稿された写真、動画などについて個人の了解なく共有するなどの行為に厳格に対処することに。最悪の場合、アカウントの永久停止も。一方、公益性に基づくなどのケースでは許容余地も認めるという｜https://t.co/TXSQvmoWap
— 藤村厚夫 (@afujimura) November 30, 2021
#Twitter said users will no longer be able to share private media, such as photos and videos, of another person without their permission, a move aimed at improving privacy and security.https://t.co/AcUhOK74Me
— Mint (@livemint) December 1, 2021
For those who want to know the policy: https://t.co/SMQA47m3wV
— Izaak (@izaaaaaaaaak) December 1, 2021
A day after Jack Dorsey stepped down as CEO, Twitter expands its safety policy, banning posting photos/videos of people without their consent. https://t.co/0bNfQjkfRO
— Suburban Black Man ?? (@goodblackdude) November 30, 2021
From a TechCrunch article:https://t.co/IO9LFQkACy pic.twitter.com/ymTWSvckVa
— Leia (@TheSWPrincess) November 30, 2021
Twitter expands safety policy, bans posting images of people without their consent | TechCrunch
— Ol’ St. Wick? (@imUrB00gieman) November 30, 2021
I’d avoid posting pictures from Hunter’s laptop going forward.
See how this shit works? ? https://t.co/7NukoD6TuN
This new policy by @Twitter raises many questions.
— Marissa J. Lang (@Marissa_Jae) November 30, 2021
Though it’s being held up by the company as a way to protect people from harassment, its overly broad language seems ripe for manipulation by those who wield power but aren’t public figures, like police. https://t.co/btimxV8cbv
Twitter bans sharing photos, video of people without their consent https://t.co/hpHem18kGc
— Matt Navarra (@MattNavarra) November 30, 2021
Posting photos that are publicly available is fine.
— Leia (@TheSWPrincess) November 30, 2021
Posting personal photos of someone without their permission isn't - the person / people in the photo can report it.
From a WaPo article: https://t.co/QxceiAo3KR pic.twitter.com/y8qx5St3gF