.png "back to home page")
Use New Amazon EC2 M1 Mac Instances to Build & Test Apps for iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple Watch, and Apple TV - https://t.co/DLhc5jXPRd #AWS #reinvent - Awesome post, @sebsto ! pic.twitter.com/c4sle3N3xs
— Jeff Barr ☁️ (@ ? ) ? (@jeffbarr) December 2, 2021
Apple has indicated that it's going to follow Google's playbook in South Korea and even if they're forced to allow alternate payment mechanisms for IAPs, they'll still require a cut. This basically defeats the entire point of the lawsuit and legislations.https://t.co/vG7wHJcSDj
— Dare Obasanjo (@Carnage4Life) December 2, 2021
I don't think we can call it 'likely' yet. It's just being used to support its argument for a stay here. commissions on non-apple IAPs (web payments) could make apple liable for the fraud taking place outside the app store. that's a big decision for apple to make
— Sarah Perez (@sarahintampa) December 2, 2021
NEW: Apple says it may start charging commissions on in-app purchases made outside its App Store as it appeals injunction going into effect ~Dec 8. Tip @techmeme https://t.co/89KBdNFGVA
— Ian Sherr (@iansherr) December 2, 2021
“Epic misled the district court into concluding that commission rates would affect licensee royalties, but Epic’s own license agreement makes clear that royalties are based on gross sales, without regard to the amount of commission paid.” https://t.co/GVoEhiQbFS
— David Barnard (@drbarnard) December 2, 2021
Heads I win, tails you lose https://t.co/uxVblReIA4
— Eric Seufert (@eric_seufert) December 2, 2021
Pretty much exactly what Tim Cook said on the stand back during the trial… https://t.co/iH9ZKBLPUP
— Rene Ritchie (@reneritchie) December 2, 2021
What I’ve come to assume is now in black and white in this filing from Apple: If the injunction goes into effect, Apple seems likely to charge a commission on any transactions that start in the app, even if they are completed on the web. https://t.co/GVoEhiQbFS pic.twitter.com/uyXjAmM1uD
— David Barnard (@drbarnard) December 2, 2021
I think Google and Apple have both been pretty clear about this. The in-app purchase mechanism has just been a convenient way to charge for all of the services that they provide. The point has never really been about processing payments; indeed Apple outsources that. https://t.co/rQyma6righ
— Randy Picker (@randypicker) December 2, 2021
Seeming like we won’t find out either way based on the likelihood of the administrative stay being granted. I still think they should drop the rate so that linking out matters less (conversions are so much higher using IAP), but that doesn’t fit Apple’s MO
— David Barnard (@drbarnard) December 2, 2021
It's coming! Apple fee for non IAP charges
— Thomasbcn (@Thomasbcn) December 2, 2021
"RIP IAP" was never happening, but the last few false hopes should be washed soonhttps://t.co/xtVfs2Vt3p ft @drbarnard
Apple legal filing indicates it intends to collect commission regardless of whether developers use IAP or a competing payments platform - 9to5Mac https://t.co/xmWESrKvth
— lunamoth (@lunamoth) December 2, 2021
애플은 인앱결제 사용하지 않더라도 앱 내에서 시작된 모든 거래에 대해 수수료를 부과하는 것을 고려하고 있음
Apple has indicated that it's going to follow Google's playbook in South Korea and even if they're forced to allow alternate payment mechanisms for IAPs, they'll still require a cut. This basically defeats the entire point of the lawsuit and legislations.https://t.co/vG7wHJcSDj
— Dare Obasanjo (@Carnage4Life) December 2, 2021