.png "back to home page")
애플, 에픽 소송 1심 판결에 항소 및 1심에서 결정한 ‘앱스토어 외부 결제 링크 허용’을 연기해달라고 요청(11월에 결정). https://t.co/CdcJadvqAO
— 푸른곰 (@purengom) October 8, 2021
And there it is… https://t.co/laKJUHgSTt
— David Barnard (@drbarnard) October 9, 2021
I called it! Hey, remember all those guys arguing with me when I was saying that Apple would never allow third-party store links? ??
— Derek Smart (@dsmart) October 9, 2021
Apple files appeal in Epic Games case that could delay changes https://t.co/envKRMXSgs
애플, 지난 9월 에픽과의 1심 판결에 항소장 제출하고 90일 내로 App Store 통해 배포하는 프로그램에서 제삼자 인앱 결제 링크를 제공할 수 있도록 조치하라는 판결 내용을 최종심까지 유보해 줄 것을 요청. https://t.co/Y99kONuAdU
— Paranal (@nagato708) October 9, 2021
NEW: Apple files appeal in Epic Games case, potentially delaying App Store changes for years https://t.co/nvrroy4YM7
— CNBC (@CNBC) October 8, 2021
Apple files appeal to delay App Store change due to Epic case ruling https://t.co/zFFBkNkcpa pic.twitter.com/o69sWPthUj
— Engadget Gaming (@engadgetgaming) October 9, 2021
Apple is appealing the Epic Games ruling it originally called a ‘resounding victory’ https://t.co/xA5kxAUZnW pic.twitter.com/L4u0i58HiM
— The Verge (@verge) October 8, 2021
Told you so https://t.co/knXQUvFx4K pic.twitter.com/XHrKskciT9
— nilay patel (@reckless) October 9, 2021
Called it. Apple had 30 days to appeal, so of course it picked the nearest Friday evening to that deadline. My Sept. 11 story: https://t.co/UkJZ7SJdaV
— John Voorhees (@johnvoorhees) October 9, 2021
The Verge’s report on the appeal: https://t.co/oTfiNQPpJI pic.twitter.com/UQwQ7ELPPs
Apple is appealing the Epic Games ruling it originally called a ‘resounding victory’ https://t.co/wTDjROjiNj #tecnología #mobile #dooh #technology @mandomando #BehaviouralMarketing #CodeNewbie #ML #AI #code #DataScience #rstats #reactjs #serverless #BigData #IoT #programming
— Club Signage (@ClubSignage) October 9, 2021
まじか
— 西島 伊佐武｜Headline Asia (Infinity Ventures) (@IsamuNishijima) October 9, 2021
Apple is appealing the Epic Games ruling it originally called a ‘resounding victory’ https://t.co/yBThT12tdZ
So when will we have the people criticizing me in 13-14 sending in their apologizing. It’s all here. The #Appstore is about that 30% pure and simple. If you’re important to Apple you get a deal. #iosdev https://t.co/X5pbIIEWri
— Michael Dominick (@dominucco) October 9, 2021
Apple vs Epic GamesではAppleが基本的には勝ったと見られたが、Appleが上訴すると判断。
— Tetsuro Miyatake (@tmiyatake1) October 9, 2021
唯一裁判長がAppleに不利な判断をした外部決済リンクの導入しても良いようにすることはAppleのセキュリティを担保しにくくなるとAppleが主張。https://t.co/3vwRuXJLdh
*breaking* Apple had called the Apple-Epic verdict "a resounding victory." Today it appealed.
— Patrick McGee (@PatrickMcGee_) October 8, 2021
Asked for Court to postpone injunction that would open up App Store to rival payments
On @FT
Perhaps Apple doesn’t think they won this after all ? https://t.co/SydkVpj60f
— Steve Troughton-Smith (@stroughtonsmith) October 8, 2021
I am not enough of an internet lawyer to know if things actually work that way or not. I considered the same, but guessing if it was the case Apple’s lawyers would probably have advised against it. Or who knows maybe they wanted to get more billable hours.
— Paul Haddad (@tapbot_paul) October 8, 2021
Tim Cook after the Epic ruling:
— Kosta Eleftheriou (@keleftheriou) October 8, 2021
“I think the ruling will be very good to try to put some of the discussions to rest on the App Store. [...]. I’m sort of looking forward to moving forward now”
Also Tim Cook: https://t.co/4PuO6o59Fc
Both sides appealing is pretty weird.
— Jeff Johnson (@lapcatsoftware) October 8, 2021
Though the judge did disagree with the market definition presented by both sides, so I guess it makes sense. https://t.co/y6FGdX0rNz
Apple went through a lot of trouble to make the judge’s ruling sound like a win. Now they’re appealing. (Announced at 7pm on a Friday to boot.) https://t.co/qjMwC9Yq7F
— Steve Kovach (@stevekovach) October 9, 2021
If Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers declines to put her ruling on hold, Apple can ask the same of the Ninth Circuit. If the Ninth Circuit says yes, its a good indication, but not a guarantee, that Apple could prevail on appeal
— Josh Sisco (@joshua_sisco) October 8, 2021
The judge thinks Apple insulates itself from price competition and wrote an order designed to create it. That’s what Apple is appealing here. It was always obvious that they would, because Apple does not want price competition.
— nilay patel (@reckless) October 9, 2021
Not sure Apple execs listen to advice. Honestly they should have cut Epic a special deal from the start like they have with other companies, and avoid this whole thing altogether.
— Jeff Johnson (@lapcatsoftware) October 8, 2021
Hubris.
A smart move by Apple. Yes, Apple’s risking getting a harsher ruling the 2nd time around, but the implications of the first ruling are far more complex than simply adding links to apps. There’s an entire economic and security side to it that needs more time to be understood. https://t.co/45mLthYytE
— Sami Fathi (@SamiFathi_) October 9, 2021
Millions are already happily transacting outside the App Store for so-called “Reader” apps like Netflix.
— Kosta Eleftheriou (@keleftheriou) October 9, 2021
Apple now says extending this to other apps would “require substantial engineering and other changes to the App Store, to App Review and its tools”
Disingenuous at best.
"Developers ... have been resubmitting or replying to the App Review team to ask how the guidelines are changing ... Their communications, some of which point to news articles, show substantial confusion about the injunction’s terms."
— kif (@kifleswing) October 8, 2021
Apple filed a peel https://t.co/hvnfgg8lZC pic.twitter.com/TouBIrKiSp
— Tim Sweeney (@TimSweeneyEpic) October 9, 2021
question mr sweeney, fortnite on MacOS always had the direct payment method.
— アリ? (@alithechill) October 9, 2021
so why did apple ban you guys from mac anyway?
But seriously guys buttons are really dangerous, as Apple explains. Some buttons are big and red. Some buttons launch nuclear missiles. If software is allowed to include buttons, they could maybe cause iPhones to explode and kill you or, worse, void your warranty. pic.twitter.com/ucbdx4vr2q
— Tim Sweeney (@TimSweeneyEpic) October 9, 2021
Not a surprise to see this, even if Apple did win 9 of the 10 counts. We also told clients this was likely to happen
— Daniel Ahmad (@ZhugeEX) October 9, 2021
The anti-steering aspect doesn't go as far as Epic wants, but companies like Paddle have shown how Apple would see a material negative impact with their method https://t.co/8F6x0OcEqA
We don’t know why Apple banned our entire account, blocking Epic from updating Fortnite for Mac. We don’t know if Apple even knew they were doing that when they did it. It’s a big mystery.
— Tim Sweeney (@TimSweeneyEpic) October 9, 2021
Some Apple-Epic news -- Apple just filed an appeal of the judge's Sept. ruling that ordered it to let developers steer customers outside the App Store.
— Kellen Browning (@Kellen_Browning) October 8, 2021
Apple also requested a stay of injunction to avoid having to make any changes until after appeal. https://t.co/0K9X8yuRk5
If you’re wondering why devs didn’t rush to sidestep the App Store after the Epic ruling, it’s bc Apple had a deadline to abide by the decision. Now it wants to delay that. It’s also planning on appealing, so the fight goes on. @BenBrodyDC has the story. https://t.co/kxfdbGQILr
— Nick Statt (@nickstatt) October 8, 2021
The other side was appealing anyways, doesn’t hurt to appeal and try to delay any forced changes.
— Paul Haddad (@tapbot_paul) October 8, 2021
Story now on @theterminal: Apple has filed for an appeal and a stay in the ruling in the trial with Epic Games, potentially delaying the need to make court-enforced App Store changes by at least a year.
— Mark Gurman (@markgurman) October 8, 2021
Apple appealing decision it largely won against Epic.
— Stephen Totilo (@stephentotilo) October 8, 2021
Twists knife by saying an injunction blocking judge's requirement to let apps circumvent app store fees wouldn't hurt Epic...because it has legally blocked Epic from returning Fortnite to the app storehttps://t.co/BXhpkDF7WQ pic.twitter.com/69P9BFKhjr
All these words for Apple to tell us the obvious: that external payments won’t be exactly like IAP.
— Kosta Eleftheriou (@keleftheriou) October 9, 2021
We get it, Apple. The whole point is to give users a choice.
Those who want, can stick with IAP. pic.twitter.com/1COCjetIBw
Here is a court filing from the head of App Review about Apple's perspective on the injunction and what it could mean for developers
— kif (@kifleswing) October 8, 2021
"It will require substantial engineering and other changes to the App Store, to App Review and its tools" https://t.co/e2qX76uzmD