A judge has ruled that an AI can’t be listed as an inventor on a patent because an individual needs to take an oath affirming their invention and an AI doesn’t meet the definition of an individual (i.e. a “natural person”).https://t.co/IJVtQVD8Jb pic.twitter.com/sSToaVd9an
— Peter Rojas (@peterrojas) September 3, 2021
While Brinkema said “the law is clear that it needs to be a human, I don’t think the law is clear,” Gaudry said. “It’s ambiguous. The wording indicates the legislators were not thinking about this possibility.”
— Grady Booch (@Grady_Booch) September 3, 2021
Well, yeah.https://t.co/HmaJXAyaJx
Court ruling: USPTO cannot issue patents to an artificial intelligence - TechSpot https://t.co/vJ2txJCQl9 #artificialintelligence #ai #technology pic.twitter.com/1ADQLQNkxi
— Milo Camacho (@milocamj) September 4, 2021
AI Machines Can't Not Be Granted Patents on Inventions: Judge - Bloomberg
— Iain Brown, PhD (@IainLJBrown) September 4, 2021
Read more here: https://t.co/a0bqScq2e9#ArtificialIntelligence #AI #DataScience #100DaysOfCode #Python #MachineLearning #BigData #DeepLearning #NLP #Robots #IoT
A judge has ruled that a computer using artificial intelligence can’t be listed as an inventor on patents https://t.co/ZF21ooglrs via @technology
— Ana Brian Nougreres (@anaBrianN) September 5, 2021
AI Machines Can't Not Be Granted Patents on Inventions: Judge - Bloomberg
— Iain Brown, PhD (@IainLJBrown) September 5, 2021
Read more here: https://t.co/a0bqScq2e9#ArtificialIntelligence #AI #DataScience #100DaysOfCode #Python #MachineLearning #BigData #DeepLearning #NLP #Robots #IoT
A judge has ruled that a computer using artificial intelligence can’t be listed as an inventor on patents https://t.co/5UBgJaVprS vía @technology
— PONS IP (@PONS_IP) September 4, 2021
A US judge has ruled that a computer using artificial intelligence can’t be listed as an inventor on patents #patent #inventor #artificialintelligence https://t.co/6pVs07Xsim via @technology
— Robert Harrison (@rjharrison000) September 4, 2021
AIが作った新しいアイデアなどを特許することは出来ないと決まった。特許は「人」にしか与えられないとアメリカの裁判長が判断(ちなみに会社は過去の裁判で「人」と言う認識になっている)。https://t.co/OhhBqGmC28
— Tetsuro Miyatake (@tmiyatake1) September 5, 2021
A computer using #artificialintelligence can’t be listed as an inventor on #patents because only a human can be an inventor under US law, a federal judge ruled in the first American decision that’s bound to be contested. @business https://t.co/US0XyBd4P7
— Sanjay Kalra | Digital Transformation Sherpa (@sanjaykalra) September 5, 2021
Only Humans, Not AI Machines, Get a U.S. Patent, Judge Says. No AI can be given Credits for an Invention!
— Indika AI (@Indika_AI) September 4, 2021
.
.
.
.https://t.co/S6foY7samN
.
.
.#ArtificialIntelligence #AI #DataScience #100DaysOfCode #Python #MachineLearning #BigData #DeepLearning #NLP #Robots #IndikaAI
미국 연방판사, 미국 법에 따라 "개인"이 발명가이어야 해서 AI 특허 발명가로 등재될 수 없다고 판결
— lunamoth (@lunamoth) September 4, 2021
AI Machines Can't Not Be Granted Patents on Inventions: Judge - Bloomberg https://t.co/58OhEyf0w3
While Brinkema said “the law is clear that it needs to be a human, I don’t think the law is clear,” Gaudry said. “It’s ambiguous. The wording indicates the legislators were not thinking about this possibility.”
— Grady Booch (@Grady_Booch) September 3, 2021
Well, yeah.https://t.co/HmaJXAyaJx