![](https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2020/06/24/PNJM/c73625cb-6e1f-4721-bf57-04678c1e3d99-9bddaa67-7558-496a-808e-ebd528b6a803_thumbnail.png?width=660&height=371&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp)
"New Jersey's Supreme Court has ruled that compelling a suspect to unlock his or her cell phone doesn't violate the Fifth Amendment. The courts continue to be deeply split on this question." https://t.co/IGJAAWCM1D
— Rob (@2Aupdates) August 11, 2020
A big one: https://t.co/P8KUBCRrFm
— Matt Rooney (@MattRooneyNJ) August 11, 2020
뉴저지 대법원, 경찰이 혐의자 폰 잠금해제 요구할 수 있다고 판결
— Wan Ki Choi (@wkchoi) August 12, 2020
- 법원, 혐의자 폰 잠금해제 위해 패스코드 사용 강요할 수 있다고 말해
- 이같은 주 대법원의 판결에도 불구하고 이는 최종적이고 결정적인 해답은 아냐
- 법원, 혐의자 측의 미 수정헌법 제 5조 주장 거부https://t.co/zIURcHQUDV
NJ Supreme Court: No 5th Amendment right not to unlock your phone https://t.co/cIU0AzY8VG
— switched (@switch_d) August 11, 2020
"New Jersey's Supreme Court has ruled that compelling a suspect to unlock his or her cell phone doesn't violate the Fifth Amendment. The courts continue to be deeply split on this question." https://t.co/IGJAAWCM1D
— Rob (@2Aupdates) August 11, 2020
NJ Supreme Court: No 5th Amendment right not to unlock your phone | Ars Technica https://t.co/cGqKewS0Of
— ElcomSoft (@ElcomSoft) August 11, 2020