.png "back to home page")
We just joined #stophateforprofit You should, too. This is why. https://t.co/sfIxrPf56d
— Tin Dog Records (@TinDogRecords) July 2, 2020
An obtuse, tone deaf Zuckerberg refuses to acknowledge hate speech problem on his platform, doubles down on rejecting pressure to change from advertiser boycott. https://t.co/T0USRZFP9F pic.twitter.com/Euen8BskGh
— Tikun Olam (@richards1052) July 2, 2020
This guy is a COMPLETE ass!
— Gina Tomlinson (@GinaCTomlinson) July 2, 2020
"...all these advertisers will be back soon enough..."#DeleteFacebook #BoycottFacebook https://t.co/uukVri7U9R
Is the @Facebook ad boycott making a dent? Apparently not: “the loss of annual Facebook rev from the boycott might be as low as 5%. Every Fortune 500 advertiser on Facebook could plummet into a volcanic fissure & the company would still be minting gold.”
— Laura Bassett (@LEBassett) July 2, 2020
https://t.co/k3rG5EGZZR
New @politico: The Facebook Boycott Is Bunk https://t.co/chSRIAVGw0
— Jack Shafer (@jackshafer) July 1, 2020
#FacebookBoycott gaining momentum. More than 700 companies, with 200 joining in just the past 24 hours https://t.co/n84cPYDyyZ
— Steve Daniels (@stevedaniels27) July 3, 2020
Starbucks, Adidas, North Face, Clorox — a growing list of companies are pulling ads from Facebook. For many, it’s part of an advertiser boycott in protest of what they say are the site’s failures to stop the spread of hate. @abbydphillip reports.https://t.co/fX4L7sa4aw pic.twitter.com/w7KBkJAlTn
— New Day (@NewDay) July 1, 2020
FB will do whatever it can to get past #StopHateForProfit without changing business practices in any way that matters. Do not let them get away with it. Learn more at StopHateForProfit(dot)com https://t.co/y8Fed21yQi
— Roger McNamee (@Moonalice) July 3, 2020
Sparkling piece from @jackshafer who punctures a lot of self-righteousness "Asking a corporation to boycott Facebook in July 2020 is a little like asking a casual drinker to observe Lent by giving up alcohol in a dry county." https://t.co/eTjXLCX9xw pic.twitter.com/rBm2PzxerA
— Iain Levine (@iainlevine) July 2, 2020
Snopes backs #StopHateForProfit: "We participated as a Facebook fact-checking 'partner' for two years before we abandoned the role, sensing that the program effectively served as a public relations effort" ???https://t.co/jD6lNPWxVA
— Stop Funding Hate (@StopFundingHate) July 2, 2020
“...More than 750 advertisers are boycotting Facebook, asking for better policing of hateful content.” https://t.co/oGNv4f3gl2
— Matt Navarra (@MattNavarra) July 3, 2020
The internet’s original debunker announces it stands with the #StopHateForProfit campaign. https://t.co/RH1OD3bbQ7
— David Carroll ? (@profcarroll) July 2, 2020
The advertising boycott of Facebook comes at a time when sales are down and companies are looking to cut discretionary ad spending, anyway. https://t.co/sIbOz6G6qS
— Matthew Keys (@MatthewKeysLive) July 2, 2020
Imagine if advertising Dollars go back into the creation of content https://t.co/k7qNjiw8WZ
— Molly Jong-Fast? (@MollyJongFast) July 3, 2020
Facebook outrage?
— Eric Jackson (@ericjackson) July 2, 2020
Stock back to all-time highs....
For those keeping score, it took 4 days to make up the outrage losses
New @jackshafer: "How the Facebook Boycott Could Just Make Facebook Stronger:
— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) July 1, 2020
Corporate ad boycotts have as long a tradition as corporate virtue-signaling. Don’t count on either to dent the social media titan.” https://t.co/pUXVAmu37y
BIG LOL
— Sleeping Giants (@slpng_giants) July 3, 2020
Two days ago, Zuckerberg arrogantly said the advertisers would come back “soon enough” without changing a thing.
If he really wanted them to come back, he’d change the policies they’re angry about. https://t.co/rFAtMtsWDf
CVS has joined hundreds of companies in an advertiser boycott of Facebook over its hate speech policies.
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) July 3, 2020
"Actions speak louder than words, which is why we've made the decision to pause advertising." https://t.co/UXQsRgLHQK
Facebook is working to persuade more than 750 advertisers to abandon their boycott. So far, for good reasons, they aren’t impressed. https://t.co/ZsZEv9wp8G
— Deborah Blum (@deborahblum) July 3, 2020
"The software that runs @Facebook may not care about the hate it distributes and the harm it enables, but the people who make that software or those who service those advertisers are human. I bet they care."@techonomy https://t.co/rBRsIZn0zy
— Dave Morgan (@davemorgannyc) July 2, 2020
New @jackshafer: "How the Facebook Boycott Could Just Make Facebook Stronger:
— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) July 1, 2020
Corporate ad boycotts have as long a tradition as corporate virtue-signaling. Don’t count on either to dent the social media titan.” https://t.co/pUXVAmu37y
ロシアがアフガンでの米兵殺害にタリバンに報奨金を出していたとの情報。
— 黒井文太郎 (@BUNKUROI) June 29, 2020
NYタイムズに続いてワシントンポストも報道。
これは確度がいっきに高くなりましたね https://t.co/VIfvNoQjaG
Opinion | Recognizing the #stateofPalestine is the only appropriate response to Israeli #annexation - The Washington Post https://t.co/4OTnmUtONj
— @Ruthαnαsıα #Palestine #BDS #UniteAgainstZionism ✊ (@Ruthanasia) July 3, 2020
?????
National mask mandate could save 5 percent of GDP, economists say https://t.co/IzecCirPpE The Washington Post - via @retailwire #retail pic.twitter.com/XbcsWJ1Vdk
— RetailWire.com (@retailwire) July 1, 2020
For 'Insta-brands,' boycotting Facebook advertising isn't easy https://t.co/9xnhS9pTuB
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) July 3, 2020
CBP was caught flying military-grade drones over protests in Minneapolis LAST MONTH.
— ACLU (@ACLU) July 3, 2020
Congress, don’t be fooled again — don't let this rogue agency deploy more invasive technologies. https://t.co/830ow3o17z
"The five-year agreement between U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Anduril Industries calls for the company to deploy hundreds of solar-powered mobile surveillance towers designed to operate in rugged locations." https://t.co/Yj8oqihkHI
— Tonya Riley (@TonyaJoRiley) July 2, 2020
Good, long piece by @NickMiroff
— Anna Giaritelli (@Anna_Giaritelli) July 2, 2020
“An irony of CBP’s contract with Anduril is that during the past three years that the Trump administration has spent billions of dollars to put up a physical barrier, technological advances have finally made a virtual wall system feasible.” https://t.co/Gi8dy6lGVy
“Anduril’s founder, 27-year-old Palmer Luckey, sold his previous company, Oculus, to Facebook for $3 billion in 2014. He was forced out at Facebook in 2017 after a donation to a pro-Trump group angered co-workers.”https://t.co/lslEOqOXXg
— blmohr (@blmohr) July 3, 2020
I'm so old, I remember when "virtual barrier" was the status quo that Trump's wall was supposed to upend. https://t.co/P0tk0Jk2H7
— Dara Lind (@DLind) July 2, 2020
EXCLUSIVE the Trump administration is hiring defense contractor and artificial intelligence firm Anduril to build the kind of "virtual border wall" system Democrats have often praised, designating it as an official program of record https://t.co/dshZv6teP5
— Nick Miroff (@NickMiroff) July 2, 2020
CBP and Anduril confirm they're planning on placing 200 surveillance towers on the southern border, but not using the company's surveillance drones https://t.co/K6sZH9ucmK
— Joshua Brustein (@joshuabrustein) July 2, 2020
Peter Thiel strikes again. https://t.co/ORLkkLZvsM
— drew olanoff (@yoda) July 2, 2020
Oculus Rift creator @PalmerLuckey's startup will build a 'virtual' border wall
— Culttture (@culttture) July 3, 2020
Government contract calls for 200 surveillance towers by 2022.https://t.co/YduQjxArZ9
Anduril is proud to support U.S. Customs and Border Protection as it expands its use of innovative technology solutions to greatly improve situational awareness and agent safety along the United States border. https://t.co/Ly5J3ie0LA pic.twitter.com/YuRqeSspwt
— Anduril Industries (@anduriltech) July 2, 2020
Don't care. Never going back to FB.
— Andrew Bloom (@AndrewWBloom) July 2, 2020
Zuckerberg Tells Facebook Employees He's Not Going To Change Policies In Response To Advertiser Boycott https://t.co/Lvfa5z1JQm
Facebook executives keep arguing that "the net impact of the different things that we’re doing in the world is positive." @juliacarriew does the math.
— Lois Beckett (@loisbeckett) July 2, 2020
Genocide, terrorism, murder, aiding the growth of violence extremist groups.
Does it balance out?https://t.co/SqT1hSAy4z
Every word of this. Hat tip to @juliacarriew for sharing it. As we wrote to Zuckerberg in 2016 and @nick_clegg fails on...Facebook wants to act as a “utility.” Well then even if 1% of its water is toxic, shouldn’t they move heaven and earth to clean it up? https://t.co/FQvptSqREa
— Jason Kint (@jason_kint) July 2, 2020
I wrote about last Thanksgiving, the last I got to spend with my grandmother, and the campaign of vicious hate, rape threats and death threats that I was experiencing throughout, in response to my reporting on Facebook and white nationalism. https://t.co/vAi1BnhOIb
— Julia Carrie Wong (@juliacarriew) July 2, 2020
"Hate is an existential threat to the people it targets, but it’s no threat at all to Facebook." @juliacarriew on firehttps://t.co/UtTyKUwq8S
— Olivia Solon (@oliviasolon) July 2, 2020
i hope every executive at Facebook reads this by @juliacarriew https://t.co/jivZNLetYH
— Charlie Warzel (@cwarzel) July 2, 2020
in @guardian @juliacarriew asks, with ?, “how many ‘likes’ make up for the hate?” #Facebook https://t.co/9IqwTnOEFO
— David Kaye (@davidakaye) July 2, 2020
This kind of arrogance… This is why Facebook needs to go away and fade into irrelevance.
— Bryan William Jones (@BWJones) July 2, 2020
This attitude basically is saying that Zuckerberg sees no problem with things, and refuses to make any course corrections to preserve his revenue stream.https://t.co/DX5Fz6YuCj
ヘイトスピーチ掲載をやめないFacebookに広告主からの #StopHateForProfit キャンペーン中だがザッカーバーグCEOは意に介さず。「どうせ戻ってくるさ」と内部の会議で発言https://t.co/bc9BjbnS3Y
— 渡邉葉 (@YoWatShiinaEsq) July 2, 2020
実際、FBの広告収入の大部分は他の媒体にPR出せない小企業に支えられている。ユーザー離脱は圧力になる
f-ck off https://t.co/D8SSmQj2uZ
— angie ? (@charmwitch) July 2, 2020