.png "back to home page")
I would love to know when that interview was scheduled. Going on Fox News to attack Twitter and make common cause with Trump right as Trump is ramping up his threats is a very specific political strategy https://t.co/eijz2acBgN
— Dan Pfeiffer (@danpfeiffer) May 28, 2020
“If world leaders are not kept to the same standard as everyone else, they wield more power to harass, defame, and silence others.” https://t.co/rLCIGNQ7MM
— NYTimes Tech (@nytimestech) May 27, 2020
Partnering with biased fake news ‘fact checkers’ is a smoke screen to lend Twitter’s obvious political tactics false credibility.
— Brad Parscale (@parscale) May 26, 2020
There are many reasons we pulled all our advertising from Twitter months ago, and clear political bias is one of them.https://t.co/oqgTq32KxS
There was an error in Twitter's fact check of Trump's vote-by-mail tweets, underscoring the challenge social media platforms face trying to arbitrate truth.
— Dustin Volz (@dnvolz) May 27, 2020
It was corrected after an elections professional notified the company (and me) about the mistake.https://t.co/bQmfZc8pBm pic.twitter.com/6IoeSzlXpq
.@realDonaldTrump’s claim that “Twitter is completely stifling FREE SPEECH” is wrong, legal experts said.
— PolitiFact (@PolitiFact) May 28, 2020
“The First Amendment protects Twitter from Trump,” said @StJohnsLaw’s @Klonick. “The First Amendment doesn’t protect Trump from Twitter.” https://t.co/0n4LISq1Mr https://t.co/a9lGs7v6O5
Per our Civic Integrity policy (https://t.co/uQ0AoPtoCm), the tweets yesterday may mislead people into thinking they don’t need to register to get a ballot (only registered voters receive ballots). We’re updating the link on @realDonaldTrump’s tweet to make this more clear.
— jack (@jack) May 28, 2020
There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent. Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed. The Governor of California is sending Ballots to millions of people, anyone.....
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 26, 2020
"It’s remarkable that, after having years to prepare for the portentous moment of calling out a false Trump tweet, Twitter couldn’t even bulletproof its own fact check." https://t.co/6CzNJkSmTe
— ryan cooper (@ryanlcooper) May 27, 2020
The wording of Twitter's notice at the bottom doesn't make it sound like a warning about the tweet -- it makes it sound like a warning about mail-in ballots. pic.twitter.com/ufebR2eFnO
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) May 26, 2020
Going on Fox to hit Twitter in defense of Trump is really a move. Good look for everyone involved. https://t.co/x319z4EBit
— Jason Goldman (@goldman) May 28, 2020
....Twitter is completely stifling FREE SPEECH, and I, as President, will not allow it to happen!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 26, 2020
.@Twitter is now interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election. They are saying my statement on Mail-In Ballots, which will lead to massive corruption and fraud, is incorrect, based on fact-checking by Fake News CNN and the Amazon Washington Post....
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 26, 2020
the latest Twitter v. Trump, with @daveyalba https://t.co/0Lo5iy5Xbe
— rocket surgery (@kateconger) May 26, 2020
“If world leaders are not kept to the same standard as everyone else, they wield more power to harass, defame and silence others.” — BKC affiliate @BostonJoan in the @nytimes ⬇️⬇️ https://t.co/Zl4MQRRpxs
— Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society (@BKCHarvard) May 27, 2020
A New Conundrum for Fact-Checking Trump on Twitter https://t.co/daTiURp1C4
— Jeffrey Levin (@jilevin) May 27, 2020
feat. the smart @BostonJoan, who says, "If world leaders are not kept to the same standard as everyone else, they wield more power to harass, defame and silence others." https://t.co/JhNndWPCw9
— Davey Alba (@daveyalba) May 26, 2020
Earlier today I was interviewed by @daveyalba and we talked specifically about what Trump might try to do if Twitter moderates him... and now we get to find out!https://t.co/Pwhk3iMuCk https://t.co/Ny0gcMI41U
— Joan Donovan, PhD (@BostonJoan) May 27, 2020
tbh anyone who has a verified account on a social media platform should ABSOLUTELY be fact checked ESPECIALLY the president/leader of a country.
— ☾helsea (@hurricane_chels) May 28, 2020
this is insane. https://t.co/SGK6mnDft8
Twitter shutdown in the United States feared tomorrow as U.S. strongman Trump prepares to pass executive order targeting the media platform for fact-checking his propaganda. Meanwhile, 100,000 dead nationwide and riots spreading over street execution. https://t.co/MHLvrPVcQF
— Anonymous (@YourAnonCentral) May 28, 2020
land of the free. https://t.co/s7ILDQcn7J
— Carlos Martinez (@agent_of_change) May 28, 2020
Well folks, are you ready for the next phase of the fascism parade?https://t.co/SnTNQZIcUS
— James Allen Grady (@JamesAllenGrady) May 28, 2020
Read ?by @mmasnick. I think one of the most dangerous aspects of this #ExecutiveOrder is that it politicises #Section230 and this can have dire consequences for the Internet and speech. Trump, Twitter, And Free Speech https://t.co/Wk4YEw1GLB via @Techdirt
— KonstantinosKomaitis (@kkomaitis) May 28, 2020
You have to imagine that having worked at Facebook will, over time, become a badge of shame, in the same way that having run an asbestos installation company would be.https://t.co/WvJkXnNxpp pic.twitter.com/MzmfCqIcwk
— Ryan Bateman (@rynbtmn) May 28, 2020
How to think about polarization on Facebook https://t.co/FopU8R6spP pic.twitter.com/O2CmuzKk9X
— The Verge (@verge) May 28, 2020
백악관, 현지 시간 목요일에 소셜 미디어에 대한 행정명령 내놓을 예정이라 밝혀. 구체적 내용에 대해서는 언급치 않아. https://t.co/awOcYeYLSD
— 나가토 유키 (@nagato708) May 28, 2020
ちょっとこの人なんとかして
— Ken Sugar? (@ken_sugar) May 28, 2020
▼米、大統領令で投稿規制を阻止か トランプ氏、28日署名へhttps://t.co/LJ5p88v5z4
▼ホワイトハウス、トランプがソーシャルメディア企業に関する大統領令に署名と記者向け談話発表https://t.co/JsGdbhSmKy
詳細も会社閉鎖権限の有無も不明。
Twitter社はノーコメント。
Mr.Trump would benefit greatly from uncencorable, blockchain-based decentralized social media :) https://t.co/eaaMND3iy8
— Sasha Ivanov (@sasha35625) May 28, 2020
Trump is expected to order a review of a law that has long protected Twitter, Facebook and Alphabet's Google from being responsible for the material posted by their users, Reuters reported. https://t.co/xgQCr6WuY7
— Indivisible Network (@IndivisibleNet) May 28, 2020
"The order requires the Attorney General to establish a working group that will monitor or create watch-lists of users based on their interactions"
— J. Scott Holland (@Telecrylic) May 28, 2020
Oboy, am I on the watchlist yet? ?
FUCK TRUMP AND BARR
How about now?
WITH A RUSTY EGGBEATER
Now? https://t.co/sGFveQWCxR
Thank you for standing up for free speech @realDonaldTrump, and thank you for fostering the strongest economy in US history, prior to covid-19. Now if we could just get you to federally legalize cannabis, you would be solidified as a presidential GOAT.https://t.co/csGuK2APO3
— MAGIC (@MagicPoopCannon) May 28, 2020
Maybe this prompted Jack to talk about it?https://t.co/2zN5Nac0hT
— The Real General Zod (@RealGeneralZod) May 28, 2020
Trump threatening to “shut down” social media sites cuz they’re silencing “Conservatives.” He’s using the word “conservative” rather loosely. What he really means are “racists,” “misogynists,” “homophobes,” “Islamophobes,” & “inciters to violence.” https://t.co/e8lom75zd5
— James J. Zogby (@jjz1600) May 28, 2020
What a degenerate lunatic
— FtK (@FtK_Artist) May 28, 2020
https://t.co/16Hl1jIwK3
Trump is expected to sign an executive order on social media companies after the Republican president threatened to shut down websites he accused of stifling conservative voices. More here: https://t.co/NZLQBNm6vE pic.twitter.com/RZ0lCboQU0
— Reuters India (@ReutersIndia) May 28, 2020
Now he going to regulate social media. First step in becoming a dictator. https://t.co/QQp6eojDJq
— Anything but Trump (@rollbackourtax) May 28, 2020
"We'll continue to point out incorrect or disputed information.”
— Bart Marcois (@bmarcois) May 28, 2020
The term for doing that is “curating content,” I.e. deciding what content is presented to consumers, and how. It’s the opposite of “neutral platforms.” It makes Twitter subject to libel laws. https://t.co/HseYfkxkQe
It's like he doesn't understand the first thing about the Constitution. Like LITERALLY the first thing ???? #1A
— Ballb*sting Queen??Princess Marx (@PrincessMarxxx) May 28, 2020
"Trump to 'sign executive order about social media"'
https://t.co/uZ8fVWTXo9
Trump to (supposedly) sign executive order on socialmedia companies on Thursday - But no idea what he’d try to do. Can he even do this? https://t.co/DK3S5dBPAt
— Marianne آرزو ??? ???????️? (@Mwforhr) May 28, 2020