.png "back to home page")
트럼프, 소셜 미디어 플랫폼 폐쇄시켜야 한다고 위협해
— Wan Ki Choi (@wkchoi) May 27, 2020
- 그는 수요일 트위터를 통해 어떤 증거도 제시하지 않고 "공화당원들은 소셜 미디어 플랫폼이 보수파 목소리를 완전히 침묵시킨다"면서 회사들을 "강력하게" 규제하거나 혹은 폐쇄시켜야 한다고 강조https://t.co/SV3jPyIgL3
President Trump threatened to "strongly regulate" or shut down social media companies, one day after Twitter added fact-checking warnings under two of the president's tweets about mail-in voting. https://t.co/vaQ3h7EzX2
— CBS This Morning (@CBSThisMorning) May 27, 2020
After Twitter Fact Checks Him, Trump Threatens to Shut Down Social Media Companies https://t.co/iTM5HqIgnK
— avi scharf (@avischarf) May 27, 2020
Seriously, if this was a stranger or your distant relative you’d be seeing about getting him professional help at this point, or at least backing away warily https://t.co/bG4LIzxixP
— Mark Lemley (@marklemley) May 27, 2020
In other words, he doesn't like getting caught in his lies, wants them to be viewed as truths for self interest and therefore wants to censor information like a Dictator. Newsflash, America doesn't work that way. #FakePresident https://t.co/sAXzAifVX6
— Mark Nielsen (@manielse) May 27, 2020
President Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened to "strongly regulate" or even shut down social media platforms after Twitter applied a fact-check to two of his tweets this week. https://t.co/TWVhtoZEDk
— CNN (@CNN) May 27, 2020
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened to "strongly regulate" or even shut down social media platforms after Twitter applied a fact-check to two of his tweets this week. https://t.co/Q9yoOT8Poi
— CNN International (@cnni) May 27, 2020
Go ahead, you feckless, spineless, brainless coward. ?
— ? ??????? ? (@vegix) May 27, 2020
Censor us all even more! ?
Shut down social media!
Watch that pent up rage pour out in to the streets!
A full blown revolution will unfold if you take away this last vestige of venting stress. ✊https://t.co/b22vptnEeb
All @realDonaldTrump has to do is LEAVE Twitter & the company COLLAPSES on its own
— Brian Maloney (@SScalpings) May 27, 2020
It's like The Pips without Gladys Knight
Or The Miracles without Smokey Robinson
How far can they go without the star attraction?https://t.co/OrpmQByK6r
Do it!
— Simon Kloot (@TraderSimon) May 27, 2020
No more Trump tweets in the middle of an equities trade will be most welcome!https://t.co/i1qHrdGA5e
“Trump threatens to ‘close’ social-media platforms”
— Tirmizi ??♂️ (@OTirmizi) May 27, 2020
Well, that escalated quickly... https://t.co/SQ2vnaXVw0
Check out this article from MarketWatch - Trump threatens to ‘close’ social-media platforms as he fights with Twitter
— Yozora Ⓥ?? (@knammari1) May 27, 2020
https://t.co/7jgjDtT72Q
The reality is that, by taking a stand, platform execs become targets of harassment and will be treated as political figures. Maybe this was inevitable, since tech co's have been wielding power over discourse for years. But it may help explain why they're reluctant to intervene.
— Will Oremus (@WillOremus) May 27, 2020
30K retweets for this discredited tale, based on a three-year old post from some wing-ding website. This is why even his critics should want DJT to play a lot of golf, because when he does, he’s not tweeting crap like this. https://t.co/WrHNJnlBU6
— Brit Hume (@brithume) May 24, 2020
the president is so full of shit on a consistent basis that everything he says now comes with a warning label https://t.co/RI3X9lGmQA
— Mark Constantine (@vexmark) May 26, 2020
This is the 1st time ever that Twitter has held Trump accountable to their terms of service… could mark a significant development if they start doing this more frequently. https://t.co/1dKoRaoMSN
— William LeGate (@williamlegate) May 26, 2020
A problem with allowing online harassment is that it's not contained to your platform, and it's easy to ignite other harassers if you know what you're doing. Case in point: https://t.co/QqsCovwNo1
— Ellen K. Pao (@ekp) May 27, 2020
Ensuring free speech by shutting down the platform. https://t.co/0w9XizrTy2
— Ben Collins (@oneunderscore__) May 27, 2020
FWIW this seems to be a pretty thorough fact check page, with a lot of links to reputable sources and tweets. A promising (if long overdue) start, although also obviously not scalable across the whole network (or even all verified/highly followed users) https://t.co/edSx8dCWBL
— Richard Nevins (@richardnevins7) May 26, 2020
Should we consider any movement--no matter how slight--forward a 'win'? The bottom line is that Twitter should treat all of its users equally and all Twitter users should behave with decency, civility, and respect--even @realDonaldTrump.
— @Speak.Ted.Speak (@TheTedCollins) May 26, 2020
Timothy Klausutis, the widower of Lori Klausutis, has written to Jack Dorsey asking him to delete tweets by President Trump spreading a debunked conspiracy theory about his late wife’s death and @JoeNBC
— Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) May 26, 2020
His letter is heartbreaking@karaswisher reports https://t.co/bcCw3E895f pic.twitter.com/rHHL7XcxUu
Step in the right direction - how pathetic that the President of the United States has to be labelled by a social media company as source of disinformation. What an embarassment before the world.
— Shanlon Wu (@shanlonwu) May 26, 2020
https://t.co/OuUBaPGWxi
Kayleigh McEnany refused to acknowledge that the president was pushing a baseless conspiracy theory accusing a journalist of murder. https://t.co/5I8F3lHupK
— HuffPost Politics (@HuffPostPol) May 26, 2020
For a president averaging 15 false or misleading claims a day, this isn’t going to cut it. https://t.co/1uaCR725jW
— Samantha Power (@SamanthaJPower) May 26, 2020
Trump just made my point for me.
— Seth Abramson (@?) (@SethAbramson) May 26, 2020
He was going to say Twitter is "completely stifling free speech" no matter *what* @jack did, so why not just delete his false posts rather than leaving them up, *in no way whatsoever stifling his free speech*, and then being accused of it anyway? https://t.co/eW51AhrtyJ
Ironically, the right to free speech is exactly what protects private companies like Twitter from having their speech acts unreasonably policed by government actors like Trump. pic.twitter.com/ItTXxL3sbv
— Tiffany C. Li (@tiffanycli) May 27, 2020
This is gonna be interesting https://t.co/EIbET5jllk
— David Smiley (@NewsbySmiley) May 26, 2020
translated: "we hope everyone forgets about this soon and we can continue to do nothing." https://t.co/u3QJD2eqRv
— Extremely Socially Distant Tom Tomorrow (@tomtomorrow) May 26, 2020
Twitter is not the government. Your right to free speech is vis a vis the government, not a private actor. You’d think that 3 years & 4 months in he could have made it around to reading the 1st amendment to the Constitution. https://t.co/YGUW7DpAtb
— Joyce Alene (@JoyceWhiteVance) May 27, 2020
The president who rose to political prominence by falsely accusing his predecessor of being an illegal Kenyan is not likely to heed such calls. https://t.co/FYmEC41X7r
— Eric Columbus (@EricColumbus) May 24, 2020
The freedom of speech tweet - Really? Shuts up press. Whistleblowers. Subpoenas. Inspector generals. NDA’s if you’re in the same room? Classifies documents and note taking at random. “Freedom of speech” that’s a lot of nerve there! https://t.co/QRieQpgHVs
— Lea Black (@LeaBlackMiami) May 27, 2020
People like to dismiss this as bluster, but Trump’s DOJ (and it’s truly his now) is actively investigating and threatening lawsuits against major tech companies. https://t.co/WfpbpMlstt
— Matthew Miller (@matthewamiller) May 27, 2020
Yep. It’s pretty simple: if @Twitter and @Google and the rest are going to editorialize and censor and act like traditional publishers, they should be treated like traditional publishers and stop receiving the special carve out from the federal government in Section 230 https://t.co/qKPE97zG87
— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) May 27, 2020
because as we all know, the first amendment prohibits private content moderation but encourages government censorship https://t.co/eUnAzyXTbk
— kilgore trout, potato thief (@KT_So_It_Goes) May 27, 2020
Because our government is so broken, the private sector has developed a new set of checks and balances.
— Katie Jacobs Stanton (@KatieS) May 26, 2020
??? @Twitter pic.twitter.com/wKKvbPZjOH
These tweets and posts should be taken down by Twitter and Facebook. They are deliberately misleading statements about our election. This is exactly the kind of statement I told Facebook leadership that we would see politicians post as the election nears. And here we are. https://t.co/VVYKh5lCT0
— Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) May 26, 2020
Looking forward to constitutional conservatives rising up in outrage against the President's threatened assault on the First Amendment. https://t.co/Xp3a2PLwD5
— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) May 27, 2020
Three years and six months into Trump's presidency, Twitter fact-checks one of president's tweets. https://t.co/R5kRA3kfu6
— Jane Lytvynenko ??♀️??♀️??♀️ (@JaneLytv) May 26, 2020
Maybe Twitter could start with your lies about the Trump Tower meeting? Or your dad accepting Putin’s false claims that the Kremlin didn’t attack the 2016 election (to help elect your pop)? https://t.co/qAIvL6Fm1C
— David Corn (@DavidCornDC) May 26, 2020
HUGE.
— Yamiche Alcindor (@Yamiche) May 26, 2020
Twitter on Tuesday slapped a fact-check label on President Trump’s tweets for the first time, a response to long-standing criticism that the company is too hands-off when it comes to policing misinformation and falsehoods from world leaders.https://t.co/gpvmzlWQli
Twitter has slapped a fact-check label Trump's tweets for the first time.
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) May 26, 2020
The tweets lied that mail-in ballots are fraudulent.https://t.co/rEeZZi04p5
Ah yes, the traditional Republican platform of heavily regulating and potentially shutting down private enterprises. https://t.co/OEDV8Ic45n
— M.G. Siegler (@mgsiegler) May 27, 2020
lmao, Twitter banned all political ads. the Trump campaign didn't pull their advertising. in fact, the Trump campaign put out a statement complaining about it when Twitter announced they were banning political ads. https://t.co/JVrXi6QTcF
— Alex Thomas (@AlexThomasDC) May 26, 2020
Lets stop for a moment and reflect on the fact that twitter has now had to add a “fact check” to a tweet sent out by @POTUS. Historically presidents have certainly mislead people. But never to this degree multiple times a day. I know it shouldn’t surprise me but it still does. https://t.co/V48Hxv3IUL
— yasminvossoughian (@yasminv) May 26, 2020
It’s all lies and fear-mongering and the evidence proves it. @Twitter and @Facebook, will you just allow the provably false statements about voting and voting procedures to be amplified endlessly on your platforms? https://t.co/irT8wsZfcb
— Vanita Gupta (@vanitaguptaCR) May 26, 2020
#BREAKING: @washingtonpost is reporting that Twitter has placed a fact check label on Pres. Trump's tweets for the first time, in a post about alleged, projected mail-in voter fraud in CA. https://t.co/vvnk3pSZT0 pic.twitter.com/XqW4qmt1qE
— KCBS 106.9 FM/740 AM (@KCBSRadio) May 26, 2020
Hopefully it will be applicable to leaders of India’s ruling party as well... https://t.co/E0RyG9zcqN
— Krishan Partap Singh (@RaisinaSeries) May 27, 2020
Your regular reminder that much of the top performing content on social media is from right-wing media. If companies like Facebook are trying to “silence conservative voices,” they’re doing an incredibly lousy job. https://t.co/SNaELVDfmK
— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) May 27, 2020
Not nearly enough https://t.co/U1oookvxuH
— Josh Schwerin (@JoshSchwerin) May 26, 2020
Trump campaign statement on new Twitter policy
— Mona Salama (@MonaSalama_) May 26, 2020
“Partnering with the biased fake news media ‘fact checkers’ is only a smoke screen Twitter is using to try to lend their obvious political tactics some false credibility.” pic.twitter.com/qEhceza27C
Twitter has labeled this tweet as misinformation & links to accurate information about mail-in ballots (no fraud issues, just safer, easier voting). The problem is once you start calling out misinformation in Trump's tweets, there's an awful lot of them to get to. https://t.co/S0kC9zv0If
— Joyce Alene (@JoyceWhiteVance) May 26, 2020
But seriously though there’s nobody with the stature to say, “Hey boss, let’s not falsely accuse people of murder to your 80 million followers and drag this poor family through hell again”? https://t.co/Krfb2j0QVk
— Blake News (@blakehounshell) May 24, 2020
The law still protects social media companies like @Twitter because they are considered forums not publishers.
— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) May 27, 2020
But if they have now decided to exercise an editorial role like a publisher then they should no longer be shielded from liability & treated as publishers under the law.
What's so sad about Mr. Klausutis's letter to Jack Dorsey is that he had to appeal to Jack for help. The GOP, as a party, is what gives him power. Not Twitter. And it doesn't care enough to do one dang thing about his smear campaigns. It's absolutely twisted.
— Amanda Carpenter (@amandacarpenter) May 26, 2020
Dear @realDonaldTrump: The First Amendment stops the government—that’s you—from interfering with free speech. That means you can’t stop @Twitter from fact checking your false tweets.
— Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) May 27, 2020
And the fact that we’re reading your excrement on Twitter shows it is not stifling your speech. https://t.co/0lF478Q1hW
Once again, “Media hostile to conservatives!” is the foundational conservative grift, the one that powers all the other grifts. They always come home to it. https://t.co/Y57Q7j1BeF
— Matt Duss (@mattduss) May 27, 2020
Twitter could be very busy. https://t.co/PNfWTPB45V
— Dan Balz (@danbalz) May 26, 2020
Oh no what if he shuts down Twitter and then we don’t get to hear from him 50 times a day. What then? https://t.co/D3mr0obYgb
— Jon Favreau (@jonfavs) May 27, 2020
The opening of a Cold Case against Psycho Joe Scarborough was not a Donald Trump original thought, this has been going on for years, long before I joined the chorus. In 2016 when Joe & his wacky future ex-wife, Mika, would endlessly interview me, I would always be thinking....
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 26, 2020
Can we take a step back & note that this happened? While I believe @karaswisher’s piece in the @nytimes helped push twitter — a non-news business whose bottom line is the bottom line, has added a fact check to the POTUS’ musings. Interesting case study in corporate responsibility https://t.co/siRwXre1Xj
— Shawna Thomas (@Shawna) May 26, 2020
This totally misunderstands why Trump lies. It isn't to convince people but to show that he is so powerful he can lie with impunity. The lie is the point. https://t.co/wD5MJuZ1AL
— Sam Freedman (@Samfr) May 26, 2020
There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent. Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed. The Governor of California is sending Ballots to millions of people, anyone.....
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 26, 2020
The president of the United States is threatening to close down social media platforms:https://t.co/bFnUzS7OFG
— Jeffrey Goldberg (@JeffreyGoldberg) May 27, 2020
Thank you Timothy Klausutis for defending your late wife from this dude, who needs a copy of the First Amendment. It’s short and clear that “Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” Not Twitter. Not Facebook. And most definitely not him. https://t.co/gmc4AZMRH7
— Kara Swisher (@karaswisher) May 26, 2020
Trump tells his 80 million Twitter followers that people like him are being "totally" silenced. Threatens to close down social media companies. https://t.co/cpGWWkbeSn
— Robert Maguire (@RobertMaguire_) May 27, 2020
Facebook will not take action on Trump's claims about mail-in ballots, the company says.
— Donie O'Sullivan (@donie) May 27, 2020
Twitter labeled the same claims (the exact same message) with a warning label last night.
This paragraph says it all. @jack can do whatever he wants. It’s his platform. But @TwitterSafety’s constant excuses around the president’s tweets no longer make sense within the framework of their current rules. They have to change the rules or admit they don’t apply to him. https://t.co/lPXfp1napI pic.twitter.com/UUGH4FbMFN
— Sleeping Giants (@slpng_giants) May 26, 2020
NEW: Twitter fact-checks Trump for the first time over false statements regarding mail-in voting.
— Makena Kelly (@kellymakena) May 26, 2020
More here:https://t.co/OG7Wvvv586
On Fox & Friends, Kellyanne Conway appears to direct online harassment at Twitter's head of site integrity, Yoel Roth: "Somebody in San Francisco will wake him up and tell him he's about to get a lot more followers." pic.twitter.com/H9ceUu6Ezv
— Bobby Lewis (@revrrlewis) May 27, 2020
And a swift response to this from the Trump campaign: pic.twitter.com/1ug1cbnouH
— Paul Farhi (@farhip) May 26, 2020
My question: Why won't President Trump give the widower of Lori Klausutis peace and stop tweeting about a murder conspiracy theory?
— Yamiche Alcindor (@Yamiche) May 26, 2020
WH Press Sec Kayleigh McEnany: Our hearts are with the family of Lori and the blame is on Joe Scarborough.
Incredible non-answer from McEnany.
Twitter statement re: Trump's tweets about Lori Klausutis: "We are deeply sorry about the pain these statements… are causing the family." Changes are in the works to "expand existing product features and policies so we can more effectively address things like this going forward" pic.twitter.com/JxiYmaYYL4
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) May 26, 2020
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” https://t.co/cvxK2LPy5U
— David Corn (@DavidCornDC) May 27, 2020
So you want to use the power of big government regulations to force private businesses to allow you to spread harmful conspiracy theories on their platforms... and that’s conservative? https://t.co/JCknsE2XKK
— Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) May 27, 2020
not surprised that twitter found the most anodyne way to say that a tweet is incorrect pic.twitter.com/PuWTP9SiWN
— grendel’s mufo (@SarahNEmerson) May 26, 2020
....Twitter is completely stifling FREE SPEECH, and I, as President, will not allow it to happen!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 26, 2020
congrats to twitter for fact checking one tweet
— Charlie Warzel (@cwarzel) May 26, 2020
This letter is very powerful: pic.twitter.com/aTSMfCzkwl
— Del Quentin Wilber (@DelWilber) May 26, 2020
The wording of Twitter's notice at the bottom doesn't make it sound like a warning about the tweet -- it makes it sound like a warning about mail-in ballots. pic.twitter.com/ufebR2eFnO
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) May 26, 2020
There was an error in Twitter's fact check of Trump's vote-by-mail tweets, underscoring the challenge social media platforms face trying to arbitrate truth.
— Dustin Volz (@dnvolz) May 27, 2020
It was corrected after an elections professional notified the company (and me) about the mistake.https://t.co/bQmfZc8pBm pic.twitter.com/6IoeSzlXpq
Twitter labels Trump tweets as "potentially misleading" for the first time https://t.co/QSmpl4FsWv pic.twitter.com/TxFaauhm3f
— The Verge (@verge) May 26, 2020
Trump didn’t write this. He can’t spell stifling and wouldn’t use commas correctly. https://t.co/jVCDCHEMJV
— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) May 27, 2020
This type of intimidation campaign, by the way, is something that journalists and others on Twitter have been dealing with for years. @jack gets plenty of it, but the experience will probably be a new one for some of his deputies who are accustomed to being out of the spotlight.
— Will Oremus (@WillOremus) May 27, 2020
i see what twitter is trying to do but just adding “get the facts” to a wrong tweet just seems like a “hell yeah, read more about how this tweet is correct” and then no ones gonna click through pic.twitter.com/igQObsWMoX
— Casey Johnston (@caseyjohnston) May 26, 2020
The Federal Elections Commission should investigate! I filed an FEC Complaint against Twitter last election. We need stronger enforcement to stop this attack on democracy. https://t.co/tK21SuDxJp https://t.co/RlaumRDGi0
— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) May 26, 2020
So is @Twitter going to start censoring & fact-checking all the numerous blue check mark "journalists" & leftwing activists who falsely claimed that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government & that @realDonaldTrump is a "puppet" of Putin for the past 4 years? ?? https://t.co/HqZ4mAMUvC
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) May 26, 2020
tweets in question here: https://t.co/lCeOT5Drwv https://t.co/wMIEWCmyG8
— Alex Heath (@alexeheath) May 26, 2020
....happen again. Just like we can’t let large scale Mail-In Ballots take root in our Country. It would be a free for all on cheating, forgery and the theft of Ballots. Whoever cheated the most would win. Likewise, Social Media. Clean up your act, NOW!!!!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 27, 2020
But nothing about it indicates it’s a “fact-check.” It’s more of a “to learn more, go to.....” https://t.co/5gi1UnJ6mS
— Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) May 26, 2020
WOW!!! Because our President and his administration believe in dangerous "alternative facts" Twitter will have to fact check him. His Twitter account is now the modern equivalent of Pinocchio's nose. https://t.co/KSXmJ37gGA
— Fred Guttenberg (@fred_guttenberg) May 27, 2020
"Twitter is stifling my free speech," he shouted on Twitter. https://t.co/cqMPVnUyfR
— (((Yair Rosenberg))) (@Yair_Rosenberg) May 26, 2020
Significant development, but maybe @GlennKesslerWP could help Twitter award Pinocchios too ... https://t.co/uWkYc5wj7K
— jonkarl (@jonkarl) May 26, 2020
This is vile. Almost every week he does something that would cause GOP politicians to call for the impeachment or resignation of a Democratic POTUS. Some of his comments are so deranged they raise 25th Amendment concerns. But still they march, in lockstep, behind dear leader. https://t.co/hvGE4GhAMF
— David French (@DavidAFrench) May 24, 2020
Twitter has now shown that everything we have been saying about them (and their other compatriots) is correct. Big action to follow!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 27, 2020
Time for you to boycott Twitter it seems https://t.co/nR4jFpjKHT
— Preet Bharara (@PreetBharara) May 27, 2020
Big move by Twitter: For the first time, Twitter calls out President Trump for false tweets by putting a separate link under two of his posts directing Twitter users to factual information about his misleading claims. https://t.co/jEqfHpB8hd
— Vindu Goel (@vindugoel) May 26, 2020
Finally, @Twitter takes some action: spox says Trump tweets “contain potentially misleading information about voting processes and have been labeled to provide additional context...” This has to happen every time. No more blatant lying w/o accountability. https://t.co/lgHz5TmxTD
— Vanita Gupta (@vanitaguptaCR) May 26, 2020
A notable part of the pushback directed at this Twitter employee is that his team focuses on bots & platform manipulation (not the same as fact-checking). But because he's been publicly critical of the president on social media, Trump surrogates are claiming it was his decision. https://t.co/cAcgogpIQF
— rocket surgery (@kateconger) May 27, 2020
You know, @marcorubio rightly was outraged when his sister was drawn into a story based on her husband. But he doesn’t have simple courage to try and help a family whose tragedy is being used as a club by the president he supports. How’d it feel when it was your family, Marco? https://t.co/ZXEnnWfzjJ
— stuart stevens (@stuartpstevens) May 27, 2020
Perhaps a good first step, but this reminds me of putting warning labels on cigarettes. They still kill. https://t.co/yiRAXREPQp
— David Corn (@DavidCornDC) May 26, 2020
“Kayleigh McEnany, the White House press secretary, pressed by reporters, offered no evidence to back up the president’s insinuations. Instead, she essentially justified them by saying that Mr. Scarborough had been critical of Mr. Trump.” https://t.co/X6n0Vf07Mk
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) May 27, 2020
Congrats @Twitter! From here on out if you DON'T comment on a prominent leaders tweet you are conveying that it is then true
— Saagar Enjeti (@esaagar) May 27, 2020
I am really looking forward to all the fact checks on senior officials of the People's Republic Of China https://t.co/p3Eddh08Cr
This is big. Facebook: Your move now? https://t.co/baASuvEKox
— CeciliaKang (@ceciliakang) May 26, 2020
A blow to her head? Body found under his desk? Left Congress suddenly? Big topic of discussion in Florida...and, he’s a Nut Job (with bad ratings). Keep digging, use forensic geniuses! https://t.co/UxbS5gZecd
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 24, 2020
Twitter: " These Tweets contain potentially misleading information about voting processes and have been labeled to provide additional context around mail-in ballots. This decision is in line with the approach we shared earlier this month." https://t.co/v9CaWKAE7U
— Alex Heath (@alexeheath) May 26, 2020
Partnering with biased fake news ‘fact checkers’ is a smoke screen to lend Twitter’s obvious political tactics false credibility.
— Brad Parscale (@parscale) May 26, 2020
There are many reasons we pulled all our advertising from Twitter months ago, and clear political bias is one of them.https://t.co/oqgTq32KxS
So now twitter has to fact check the fake news on Trump saying twitter is stifling free speech...
— ian bremmer (@ianbremmer) May 26, 2020
Turtles all the way down. https://t.co/7hz91771IJ
.@Twitter is now interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election. They are saying my statement on Mail-In Ballots, which will lead to massive corruption and fraud, is incorrect, based on fact-checking by Fake News CNN and the Amazon Washington Post....
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 26, 2020
I've got a hunch that a certain keen user of Twitter isn't going to be too happy that the site has added a "Get the facts" link at the bottom of his tweet, debunking his claims about mail-in ballots...https://t.co/TQiUPfgxte pic.twitter.com/SZALPknJKT
— Graham Cluley (@gcluley) May 26, 2020
Twitter labels Trump’s tweets as ‘potentially misleading’ for first time #SmartNews https://t.co/StznLzeX8K
— @Defeat_GOP (@defeat_gop) May 26, 2020
Twitter labels Trump’s tweets as ‘potentially misleading’ for first time https://t.co/oE47cAJZCw #SmartNews #DeleteTrumpAccount
— Howard I Rubin (@HowardIRubin) May 26, 2020
Twitter labels Trump tweets as “potentially misleading” for the first time https://t.co/fRbqZyeLMw via @Verge
— Kenny_ANTI_gop (@Hope012015) May 27, 2020
Twitter labels Trump’s tweets as ‘potentially misleading’ for first time #SmartNews https://t.co/2Qsj1u2VNA
— kimfiredup (@kimjirak1) May 27, 2020
트위터, 처음으로 트럼프의 트윗 2개 '잠재적으로 오도' 한다고 레이블 붙여
— Wan Ki Choi (@wkchoi) May 26, 2020
- 트위터, 화요일 트럼프의 우편 투표에 대한 잘못된 진술이 포함된 2개 트윗을 '잠재적으로 오도'한다고 레이블 붙여
- 이는 플랫폼이 최초로 현직 대통령의 트윗에 팩트-체크를 한 것https://t.co/kmZtb3AAnZ
Twitter labels Trump’s tweets as ‘potentially misleading’ for first time #SmartNews https://t.co/fRussvhFZf
— ?? ?????? ?????? (@DaOGTriple) May 27, 2020
I don't understand what Twitter is trying to accomplish here. Twitter declaring a Trump tweet false is way more likely to damage Twitter's reputation among Trump fans than it is to change anyone's mind about the substance of the tweet. https://t.co/aXSCaxPv0w
— Timothy B. Lee (@binarybits) May 27, 2020
Twitter’s first fact-check on President Trump calls out “false claims” https://t.co/fBztVUxQs9
— Jennifer Ouellette (@JenLucPiquant) May 27, 2020
Twitter’s first fact-check on President Trump calls out “false claims”.
— Reg Saddler (@zaibatsu) May 27, 2020
Wherever you see Trump's tweet, it now says, "Get the facts about mail-in ballots." https://t.co/FEc7IMKBuc #Disinformation #Misinformation #Socialmedia pic.twitter.com/MXOgbdFKeM
For the first time, Twitter has put a fact-checking warning on a tweet from President Trump because it contains "misleading information about the voting process," a company spokesman says. https://t.co/AbCboNIfWi
— NPR (@NPR) May 27, 2020
The tweet was about vote by mail. Years of nonpartisan research confirms that absentee voting is secure, and does not unfairly advantage one political party over the other.https://t.co/lP5KAqboVV
— RepresentUs (@representus) May 27, 2020
Twitter Places Fact-Checking Warning On Trump Tweet For 1st Time https://t.co/8ude82mAVN#INDIGENOUS #TAIRP
— Indigenous (@AmericanIndian8) May 27, 2020
Twitter has added a fact-checking warning on one of President Trump's tweets for the first time in which he falsely claimed mail-in ballots are fraudulent.
— NPR Politics (@nprpolitics) May 27, 2020
Trump then lashed out at the company and threatened to "close them down." https://t.co/codTt3XIHk
For the first time, Twitter has put a fact-checking warning on a tweet from President Trump because it contains "misleading information about the voting process," a company spokesman says.https://t.co/kytfodn7MC
— NPR (@NPR) May 26, 2020
Twitter Points Users To Fact Checks Of Trump Tweets For The First Time
— SNOWFLAKE (@jawja100) May 27, 2020
DRUMFSTER RESPONDED BY ACCUSING TWITTER OF STIFLING FREE SPEECH,
TRUMP SHOULD BE TREATED NO DIFFERENTLY THAN ANYONE ELSE.
FOLLOW THE RULES OR GO HOME!
GOT THAT, JACK?https://t.co/GRnXjTPcwp
Twitter Places Fact-Checking Warning On Trump Tweet For 1st Time
— Bonnie??Test*Trace*Isolate (@BonniBK) May 27, 2020
trump amplifies misinformation to his 80 million followers daily, when he gets fact checked for the first time, he whines like a baby.
How can anyone respect this weak, spineless man? https://t.co/Z00cJL8mGs
Think about how crazy this is for a minute...
— Barry Schapiro, MD, FAAOS (@bschapiroMD) May 27, 2020
This wasn’t done to fight propaganda coming from North Korea or Russia or China. This was installed to thwart conspiracy theories and propaganda from the American President and the White House.
https://t.co/0oy0gwRbIT
Twitter stamped a fact-checking warning on a tweet by President Trump — in which he claims without evidence that mail-in ballots are fraudulent. https://t.co/fOLkRZSgI4
— Morning Edition (@MorningEdition) May 27, 2020
Last week, Aus & NZ got together to discuss, among other things, concern over China’s rising hegemony. This will determine whether India becomes a political superpower: whether India can stand up to China on behalf of others even if it doesn’t need to https://t.co/56lbH9CiR7
— Mohamed Zeeshan (@ZeeMohamed_) July 21, 2019
Can we stop pretending Trump is fit to be president? Thank you!!#wtpTEAM#wtp2020https://t.co/ZndsB4ccbw
— Didi (@DidiDarrer) May 25, 2020
Watch @wapodavenport juggle two live shows tomorrow at 3pm ET on https://t.co/qO7dngelyF https://t.co/aMRHkXfgQk
— Micah Gelman (@mbgelman) May 26, 2020
https://t.co/rsXvSEgBX1
— Maiquel.2509 (@Maiquel59232858) August 19, 2019
After almost two years of having stopped the CFRP, thousands of families that were invited to participate in the program are still waiting for their cases to be resolved.
President Trump just bulldozed the high ground in his dispute with Twitter by suggesting that he could retaliate against the company to shut them down through "strong" regulations. You cannot defend free speech by claiming the right to control it... https://t.co/mQDe4IzdCl
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) May 27, 2020
Trump warns social media giants that feds can ‘regulate’ or ‘close them down’ amid fight with Twitterhttps://t.co/hcpkSB1egt
— ??Dan Crotts⭐️⭐️⭐️ ❌❌❌❌ (@crotts_dan) May 27, 2020
President @realDonaldTrump was right about fraudulent mail-in voting and he’s right about anti-conservative bias from social media companies like @Twitter. Our values and our right to free speech are under assault by the radical left. https://t.co/p1HRHz2aGL
— Rep. Ralph Abraham (@RepAbraham) May 27, 2020
Trump warns social media giants that feds can ‘regulate’ or ‘close them down’ amid fight with Twitter- #TheMoreYouKnow https://t.co/SQhU9AtDi7
— Karli Q ⭐️⭐️⭐️ - Text TRUMP to 88022 (@KarluskaP) May 27, 2020
CONSERVATIVES ARE FED UP
— ??D⭐️E⭐️A⭐️N??† (Text Trump to 88022) WWG1WGA (@deanomight1) May 27, 2020
WITH THE @JACK-WAGONS
AT THE #TWURDBURGLAR
FACTORY!
TAKE OVER THE DEEP STATE
SPONSORED CENSORSHIP, FINE THE#TWITS & GIVE THE PLATFORM
IT'S TRUE VOICE !@TWITTER IS ATTEMPTING
TO TAMPER WITH THE 2020 ELECTION
“STOP THE STEAL"https://t.co/NhYzkNOZcz
トランプ大統領はツイッターとの戦いでアメリカ??中央銀行の
— ?? ?? JK Trump Supporter Japan?? (@TTrumpSJapan) May 27, 2020
「FRB」が「規制」または「閉鎖」することができると巨大な
ネットワークに警告したhttps://t.co/5D9lK2g5pM
Twitter has hired a Chinese software AI company to help “root out” and auto-block whatever violates Twitter’s policies. This is a massive slippery slope; so glad our President is standing up for us. Love that guy!
— Lorenzo (@Lorenze42) May 27, 2020
Trump Warns Social Media Re: Censorshiphttps://t.co/RtGgXMf5XZ
.@realDonaldTrump warned social media giants the Fed. Gov. could “strongly regulate” or “close them down” if they continue to “silence conservative voices” amid flaring battle with @Twitter after the platform fact-checked one of his tweets for the 1st time https://t.co/RSnfmqOpfm pic.twitter.com/RDDugshi0l
— Adam Milstein (@AdamMilstein) May 27, 2020
Trump warns social media giants that feds can ‘regulate’ or ‘close them down’ amid fight with Twitterhttps://t.co/qVyqHtgAVw
— Dark to Light (@pushforward40) May 27, 2020
Trump warns social media giants that feds can 'regulate' or 'close them down' amid fight with Twitter https://t.co/00JPpbC3XG @FoxNews #AAG #AAG2020
— All American Girl (@AIIAmericanGirI) May 27, 2020
Free Speech is what keeps America the great land that it is. We cannot allow it to be shut down.https://t.co/2C7I3iLJ1q
— Linda Lewis (@snowball1926) May 27, 2020
This man must be voted out of office! #NotMyPresident #FreeSpeechhttps://t.co/CFPULPlAWN
— Michelle Kinner (@Geminiwitch16) May 27, 2020
Trump threatens to shutter social media companies over alleged election interference https://t.co/jp7pFwHnFm
— #TuckFrump (@realTuckFrumper) May 27, 2020
We know that whenever Trump spews, it’s pure pathological projection. Trump threatens to shutter social media companies over alleged election interference #Twitter #TrumpLiesPeopleDie https://t.co/dxc1KR4Ait
— ? Stomp Out Stupid ? #GiantMeteor2020 ? (@Stop_UTK_Now) May 27, 2020
Trump threatens to shutter social media companies over alleged election interference https://t.co/zet4jiPU71 pic.twitter.com/sdpQzDN0Ne
— ProgressivePower (@OurProgressive) May 27, 2020
New: Twitter’s ‘world leaders’ policy gets a new test with Trump’s baseless claims about Joe Scarborough, w @Lauren_Feiner https://t.co/Kn2ml7cUpZ
— Christina Wilkie (@christinawilkie) May 26, 2020
Mika Fail.
— ]intheMatrixxx[ (@intheMatrixxx) May 26, 2020
Twitter refuses to delete President Trump’s baseless claims about Joe Scarborough.
...and they are NOT BASELESS CLAIMS. https://t.co/FLM3e8oXJi
Twitter admits their current policies do not allow them to censor Trump's tweets about Joe Scarborough
— TruthHammer⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@TruthHammer888) May 26, 2020
Twitter: "We’ve been working [on] policies so we can... address things like this going forward, and we hope to have those changes in place shortly.”https://t.co/xAQnSmQX9P
.@Twitter, apparently content with being a tool of the Trump 2020 campaign, refuses to delete Trump's baseless claims about Joe Scarborough https://t.co/zeW3Y5HE6c
— (((Al ????➊ Criswell))) (@Gdad1) May 26, 2020
"Twitter refuses to delete Trump’s baseless claims about Joe Scarborough"https://t.co/XMMgMZtP55
— doug wiser (@MyBigRedTruck) May 26, 2020
Well, that isn't shocking is it?
Twitter refuses to delete Trump's baseless claims about Joe Scarborough, but WHY are we even having this discussion?
— Eddie Muddy (@thugsRbadMK) May 26, 2020
We’re having it because @realDonaldTrump is a petulant CHILD who has no self control #NotMyPresident#FakePresident https://t.co/WBhUJDhOMY
Twitter refuses to delete Trump's claims about Joe Scarborough. Does anybody think we would get away with that? Let's see. Trump has never paid taxes, has paid for countless abortions has personally paid hitmen to cover up his crimes. True? Doesn't matter.https://t.co/FYw1Owhccb
— Henry M. Rosenberg (@DoctorHenryCT) May 26, 2020
“There is a wickedness in our president that long ago corrupted him. It’s corrupted his party. And it’s in the process of corrupting our country, too.” https://t.co/jEQ6OLL77A
— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) May 26, 2020
"Donald Trump doesn’t merely want to criticize his opponents; he takes a depraved delight in inflicting pain on others, even if there’s collateral damage in the process, as is the case with the Klausutis family," @Peter_Wehner writes: https://t.co/Oo8BpKtE3w
— Betty Buckley (@BettyBuckley) May 27, 2020
"There is a wickedness in our president that long ago corrupted him. It's corrupted his party. And it's in the process of corrupting our country too...He is a Crimson stain on American Decency. He needs to go."
— Southern Sister Resister (@ResisterSis20) May 27, 2020
Full Stop.#LeadershipNotLies https://t.co/snlH9sYlKr
"Donald Trump doesn’t merely want to criticize his opponents; he takes a depraved delight in inflicting pain on others, even if there’s collateral damage in the process, as is the case with the Klausutis family. There’s something quite sick about it all."https://t.co/uhDCN9RX3J
— Peter Wehner (@Peter_Wehner) May 26, 2020
“I’m asking you to intervene in this instance because the President of the United States has taken something that does not belong to him—the memory of my dead wife—and perverted it for perceived political gain.” Has a sadder sentence ever been written? https://t.co/JV3Rts1pUa
— Barbara Malmet (@B52Malmet) May 27, 2020
The Malignant Cruelty of Donald Trump - The Atlantic https://t.co/O5z4GSfqK3
— chef mark best (@markbest) May 27, 2020
"There is a wickedness in our president that long ago corrupted him. It’s corrupted his party. And it’s in the process of corrupting our country, too. He is a crimson stain on American decency. He needs to go." @TheAtlantic https://t.co/uhDCN9RX3J
— Peter Wehner (@Peter_Wehner) May 26, 2020
Conservative former GOPer nails it:
— Mindful Primate (@MichellesDude) May 27, 2020
"There is a wickedness in our president that long ago corrupted him. It’s corrupted his party. And it’s in the process of corrupting our country, too.
He is a crimson stain on American decency. He needs to go."https://t.co/Jov8EXiDoS
Donald Trump doesn’t merely want to criticize his opponents; he takes a depraved delight in inflicting pain on others, even if there’s collateral damage in the process, as is the case with the Klausutis family. There’s something quite sick about it all. https://t.co/TPkzLdesPs
— fuckcancer (@fuckcancer56) May 27, 2020
Malignant cruelty mitigated only by staggering ineptitude = Donald Trump’s trademark. Unforgettable and unforgivable. https://t.co/b83IxOTmdu
— Laurence Tribe (@tribelaw) May 27, 2020
"Donald Trump doesn’t merely want to criticize his opponents; he takes a depraved delight in inflicting pain on others, even if there’s collateral damage in the process, as is the case with the Klausutis family," @Peter_Wehner writes: https://t.co/E0qeddv4KY
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) May 27, 2020
Sadism is a component of malignant narcissism “Trump doesn’t merely want to criticize his opponents; he takes a depraved delight in inflicting pain on others, even if there’s collateral damage There’s something quite sick about it all.”—Peter Wehner https://t.co/xF8Vk400pb
— Duty To Warn ? (@duty2warn) May 27, 2020
When Teddy Roosevelt talked about the "bully pulpit" of the presidency he defined the adjective "bully" as "excellent" and "first rate" (according to Websters). The current president uses a more modern definition. https://t.co/dFjI8ZwXAF
— Dan Rather (@DanRather) May 27, 2020
“With the president...sending out lunatic tweets and calling for ‘the opening of a Cold Case against Psycho Joe Scarborough,’ human decency requires a response.”
— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) May 26, 2020
I’d add:Decency particularly requires a response from those who work with or for Donald Trump. https://t.co/jEQ6OLL77A
"Donald Trump doesn’t merely want to criticize his opponents; he takes a depraved delight in inflicting pain on others, even if there’s collateral damage in the process, as is the case with the Klausutis family," @Peter_Wehner writes: https://t.co/Oo8BpKtE3w
— Betty Buckley (@BettyBuckley) May 27, 2020
The Malignant Cruelty of Donald Trump
— Michael Sexton (@jmsexton_) May 27, 2020
The president is defaming the memory of a woman who died nearly 20 years ago—and inflicting pain upon her family today.https://t.co/Nq4NFq1ieF | @TheAtlantic
"Donald Trump doesn’t merely want to criticize his opponents; he takes a depraved delight in inflicting pain on others, even if there’s collateral damage in the process, as is the case with the Klausutis family," @Peter_Wehner writes: https://t.co/q6ilvlhmJe
— Aaron E. Carroll (@aaronecarroll) May 26, 2020
"Donald Trump doesn’t merely want to criticize his opponents; he takes a depraved delight in inflicting pain on others, even if there’s collateral damage in the process, as is the case with the Klausutis family." - @PeterWehner #ShitholePresident https://t.co/hMt0gMx3RP
— Democratic Coalition (@TheDemCoalition) May 27, 2020
“There is a wickedness in our president that long ago corrupted him. It’s corrupted his party. And it’s in the process of corrupting our country, too.”https://t.co/Rc7O6vffXW
— Holly Lee (@LeeHolly81) May 26, 2020
The Malignant Cruelty of Donald Trump.
— Mac McKinsey (@MacMcKinseyIV) May 27, 2020
There is a wickedness in our president that long ago corrupted him. It’s corrupted his party. And it’s in the process of corrupting our country, too.
He is a crimson stain on American decency. He needs to go.https://t.co/hEigDGNvWR
An important article Americans need to read slowly, let it sink in, and clearly understand.
— Douglas Reber (@Douglasreber) May 27, 2020
Then share.
https://t.co/FjxJpEXw6t
The Malignant Cruelty of Donald Trump - The Atlantic https://t.co/osJrXwpr2z
— Jeffrey Levin (@jilevin) May 27, 2020
There’s no evidence that Joe Scarborough was involved in a staffer’s death. President Trump keeps pushing the conspiracy theory anyway. https://t.co/s3LOnEpqaL
— Vox (@voxdotcom) May 26, 2020
I wrote 2000 words on Trump’s Joe Scarborough smear campaign yesterday. It’s not the first time he’s dabbled in conspiracy theories to attack a perceived enemy.https://t.co/XHZfZooCJx
— Katelyn Burns (@transscribe) May 27, 2020
The baseless Joe Scarborough conspiracy theory that Trump keeps pushing, explained https://t.co/lfKvqp3sWP
— #TheResistance (@SocialPowerOne1) May 27, 2020
Donald Trump is the conspiracy theory president.
— Katelyn Burns (@transscribe) May 26, 2020
New from me: https://t.co/XHZfZooCJx
Pro Rata Podcast is all new, talking with @karaswisher about Trump vs. Twitter... vs. Trump.https://t.co/dpjeWOGrnV
— Dan Primack (@danprimack) May 27, 2020
If ever an industry needed some pretty serious regulation. https://t.co/myC8mtoclB
— Kevin Leahy ???????? (@KevinSLeahy) May 27, 2020
"The complaint focuses on federal securities law, arguing that Facebook’s failure to tell shareholders about the extent of illegal activity on its platform is a violation of its fiduciary duty."
— Fiddler (@cFidd) May 27, 2020
Interesting approach. https://t.co/NkJcnyjhpI
Administration doesnt react well to even the slightest whiff of pushback from twitter, so Conway heads to a friendly channel and lobs a tacit threat at a company exec https://t.co/7wBlLpmI2T
— rat king (@MikeIsaac) May 27, 2020
Wow. Trump is now calling out the same Twitter employee that Kellyanne Conway called out yesterday.
— Kurt Wagner (@KurtWagner8) May 28, 2020
Twitter told me that he has received death threats because he's been singled out as the employee who decided to fact-check Trump. This is not the case, I'm told. https://t.co/rpO7TijHLb
First, we should get our terms straight: "Bot" means a lot of different things to a lot of different people — and doesn't necessarily refer to coordinated, manipulative, or inauthentic behavior. https://t.co/CPSTFvZFDi
— Yoel Roth (@yoyoel) May 24, 2020
No one person at Twitter is responsible for our policies or enforcement actions. We are a team with different points of view and we stand behind our people and our decisions to protect the health of the public conversation on our platform. #OneTeam https://t.co/Jbav8pyAcE
— Vijaya Gadde (@vijaya) May 27, 2020
The White House and right-wing media are targeting a Twitter employee after the platform fact-checked President Trump for the first time. Yet the employee, according to the company, had nothing to do with the decision to fact-check the tweet. https://t.co/rDT6moxhUf
— Hamza Shaban (@hshaban) May 27, 2020
Just FYI this is a great thread about bots by someone who does not deserve trolling ? https://t.co/kByN9kktAY
— Kara Swisher (@karaswisher) May 27, 2020
Oh great. https://t.co/rBwVhzVZZE
— Brit Hume (@brithume) May 27, 2020
Harassing messages are appearing every minute under his latest posts, and right-wing accounts with millions of followers have been tweeting out his name and personal information every hour since mid-Tuesday. https://t.co/ff7oZJsrFd
— Tracy Chou (@triketora) May 27, 2020
This person is the “head of site integrity” at Twitter pic.twitter.com/hyZcl5VIe0
— Jon Levine (@LevineJonathan) May 27, 2020
This is a good thread. This is also a discussion I keep having with people who say "it's a bot". There is plenty of discussion out there in research about how some very real people have social media behaviour that's virtually indistinguishable from what people understand as bots. https://t.co/AgLiA7UA9P
— Elizabeth May (@_ElizabethMay) May 25, 2020
Brian Kilmeade still has no idea what he's talking about with regard to the Twitter executive he and a right-wing outrage mob are incorrectly blaming for a Trump fact-check. https://t.co/6biBR45Qmf pic.twitter.com/xHmUeaU9Wj
— Bobby Lewis (@revrrlewis) May 28, 2020
Unbelievable...
— Eric Trump (@EricTrump) May 27, 2020
cc. @Twitter @jack https://t.co/GzpNTBYfdm
The White House is now engaging in targeted harassment of one of Twitter's own employees after the company had the gall to enforce its own misinformation policy and fact check the president's false voter fraud tweets. https://t.co/nNUMQFE9dj
— Nick Statt (@nickstatt) May 27, 2020
"right-wing accounts with millions of followers, including the president's son and the Trump campaign's official account, have been tweeting out his name and personal info every hour since mid-Tuesday" - harassment of @Twitter's Yoel Roth over factcheck https://t.co/XeVfpz1buk
— Kim Zetter (@KimZetter) May 27, 2020
Fact check: there is someone ultimately accountable for our actions as a company, and that’s me. Please leave our employees out of this. We’ll continue to point out incorrect or disputed information about elections globally. And we will admit to and own any mistakes we make.
— jack (@jack) May 28, 2020
Twitter’s statement was an answer to an argument no one even made.
— Will Ricciardella (@WillRicci) May 27, 2020
That should tell you all you need to know about Twitter. https://t.co/OR84dG81Rk
Maybe twitter should ban accounts that abuse their employees. https://t.co/gwcbFq8UZZ
— Dan Sugalski (@Wordshaper) May 28, 2020
There are lots of different ways of using Twitter. Some people Tweet a lot; some never Tweet at all, or only Tweet sporadically. There's no right or wrong way to use Twitter — and many "bot" studies wind up dismissing a lot of real activity as inauthentic. https://t.co/66viWs7uJt
— Yoel Roth (@yoyoel) May 24, 2020
The only problem with saying Yoel Roth is the wrong guy is that his name and photo are on the blog post where Twitter talks about the new warning labels: https://t.co/OCPe0Za4fw https://t.co/3LInOp8kkI
— Mathew Ingram (@mathewi) May 27, 2020
I am very glad to see that Twitter is not abandoning their colleague as the president's minions attack, but I wish they would use stronger language than calling it "unfortunate"https://t.co/5J5Dcnld1r
— tc (@chillmage) May 27, 2020
We've seen no evidence to support the claim that "nearly half of the accounts Tweeting about #COVID19 are likely bots.” ? with a few thoughts on the subject... https://t.co/f39NshjvWN
— Yoel Roth (@yoyoel) May 24, 2020
Where the fuck is @jack? The President is calling the brownshirts in to attack one of his senior employees and @jack is nowhere to be found.
— Nelson Minar (@nelson) May 27, 2020
man, not even 12 hours since one of Trump's hideous libels was lightly corrected and we get to see the White House lawn used to encourage their most vicious supporters to break their parentheses keys. https://t.co/iFJr5ClYws
— Zeddy (@Zeddary) May 27, 2020
This isn’t *just* using White House bully pulpit to incite a digital mob against a tech staffer who’s never been a public figure.
— Emily Horne (@emilyjhorne) May 27, 2020
It’s also an implicit threat to every tech worker (really, every American), saying this White House can & will target you by name for doing your job. https://t.co/iF21ELfN5K
Interesting thread. Some of it doesn't necessarily fit my priors, but it is always useful to have one's prejudice challenged, even if the source might have some vested interest. https://t.co/05kXZnnlpq
— Prof Francois Balloux (@BallouxFrancois) May 25, 2020
Jack is in this no-win position because he never enforced rules with any conscientiousness or consistency, so (1) the norms completely degraded & (2) users like Trump came to expect that disinformation & meanness are OK. You can’t put the genie back in the bottle 10+ years later. https://t.co/Ddj0Kjjbi1
— Marc Bodnick (@MarcBodnick) May 27, 2020
We are with you @vijaya @jack and team https://t.co/e27FGzVJkw
— Padmasree (@Padmasree) May 27, 2020
Twitter is defending an employee whose 2016 and 2017 tweets criticizing President Trump came under scrutiny after Twitter appended a fact check message to false tweets by the President https://t.co/1Y7KOnXpDH
— CNN (@CNN) May 28, 2020
Yoel Roth is the Twitter employee in charge of "developing and enforcing Twitter’s rules" and he has a history of tweeting terrible and vile things that show he has a very bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS)! https://t.co/1Ejq5Rt1uS
— Trump War Room - Text TRUMP to 88022 & get the APP (@TrumpWarRoom) May 27, 2020
"Who's fact-checking the fact-checkers?" Fox & Friends defends Trump's lies about mail-in voter fraud, complaining that Jack Dorsey "folded to the left" and a Twitter executive, Yoel Roth, has said mean things about conservatives. pic.twitter.com/Ce2VWs14hN
— Bobby Lewis (@revrrlewis) May 27, 2020
Hey @KellyannePolls while targeting Twitter execs like the reprehensible person you are and calling out your army of Russian trolls is just another Wednesday for you, I’d say pick on someone your own size. The problem? Nanotechnology hasn’t gotten to that tiny a molecule yet. https://t.co/itk0OBokZ3
— Kara Swisher (@karaswisher) May 27, 2020
Also, the person identified as being the main Twitter fact check person… isn’t. https://t.co/OGWWUJYcbm
— Jane Coaston (@cjane87) May 28, 2020
This story doesn’t cite anyone saying that Twitter’s head of integrity was personally responsible for fact-checking Trump’s tweet. The reason his tweets are catching fire is that it personifies the embedded bias among Twitter employees with decision rights https://t.co/QJH0pBOG86
— Amber Athey (@amber_athey) May 27, 2020
Why would @TeamTrump think @twitter ‘s Yoel Roth was responsible for the “fact check” bc twitter said so via @BuzzFeed Trump’s Campaign And Fox News Are Attacking A Twitter Employee Because They Think He Fact-Checked The President. They Have The Wrong Guyhttps://t.co/urKui0gy6r pic.twitter.com/01MXBzoz7D
— Sean Spicer (@seanspicer) May 28, 2020
Brian Kilmeade continues to single out Twitter's head of site integrity in retaliation for the platform fact-checking two Trump tweets, even though we learned yesterday that the right-wing outrage mob has the wrong guy. https://t.co/6biBR45Qmf pic.twitter.com/VM9lNLdeYd
— Bobby Lewis (@revrrlewis) May 28, 2020
Trump's Campaign And Fox News Are Attacking A Twitter Employee Because They Think He Fact-Checked The President. They Have The Wrong Guy. | Via BuzzFeed https://t.co/A5OiGIB65a
— SafetyPin-Daily (@SafetyPinDaily) May 28, 2020
https://t.co/87crwMAeQk
— Maryanne Chisholm #resist ?? #art ?? #kindness (@MaryanneChisho2) May 27, 2020
Trump’s Campaign And Fox News Are Attacking A Twitter Employee Because They Think He Fact-Checked The President. They Have The Wrong Guy. https://t.co/xEhhJPc6Fk via @broderick
So basically Twitter is saying no one in an actual department at Twitter is responsible for enforcing its policies? Collective “Twitter” just happened to slap a ‘fact check’ political attack on Trump’s tweets?
— Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) May 27, 2020
Riiiight. #TheAlgorithmMadeMeDoIt https://t.co/H0AQbm8Fqy
How about we don't use legislation to prevent fact checking?
— Cyberdyne Vulpine (@EmberFoxie) May 28, 2020
Totalitarian propaganda is a bad look.https://t.co/SPF4mpIG69
Trump is so upset that Twitter exposed his lying that he's making an executive order to protect his l̶i̶e̶s̶ freedom of expression. Trump called Twitter's move fundamentally un-American and anti-democratic.
— Victor Stoddard (@VicStoddard) May 28, 2020
The tantrum continues.
https://t.co/1ziOE2TB1K
#TwitterFactCheck #jack #Trump
— *•.¸♡ Ꮆяєтє ♡¸.•* (@Gr3Te4rights) May 28, 2020
And #Twitter still let him tweet? Why?
White House organizes harassment of Twitter employee as Trump threatens company https://t.co/BL6T7NImkR
White House organizes harassment of Twitter employee as Trump threatens company https://t.co/97T7NIQmNP pic.twitter.com/LWmASJ2CAT
— The Verge (@verge) May 28, 2020
Twitter employee now receiving death threats after White House initiates a bullying campaign. https://t.co/RQ6qjjCbps
— David Sleight (@stuntbox) May 28, 2020
Twitter employee now receiving death threats after White House initiates a bullying campaign. https://t.co/K1VecOCWrM
— Bongmaster Exotic (@jerweber) May 28, 2020
Cowboys do like to kill all Democrats
— Trump'sPissingMeOff SOS ????♀️? (@RetiredMaybe) May 28, 2020
Not my words. Theirs
https://t.co/49ucGmLdxp
Social media bias lawsuits keep failing in court https://t.co/NTv3t0XmWx pic.twitter.com/JvI7EcxLte
— The Verge (@verge) May 27, 2020
There’s the bluster from Trump and Rubio and Hawley about platform censorship, and then there’s the reality: the platforms themselves have First Amendment rights and every conservative speech lawsuit against them fails. @thedextriarchy explains: https://t.co/dkaTzcFBMX
— nilay patel (@reckless) May 27, 2020
"Courts across the country have repeatedly defended social networks’ rights to ban at will." https://t.co/TIGj4dbs7I
— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) May 28, 2020
Lawsuits filed by right wingers against Social Media companies for alleged "bias" keep losing in court. https://t.co/EY7jMzfAHh
— Trial Lawyer Richard (@TrialLawyerRich) May 27, 2020
Social media bias lawsuits keep failing in court https://t.co/vnDHMc6OZT via @Verge
— Mafiosa Bianca (@KHiveQueenBee) May 28, 2020
Social media bias lawsuits keep failing in court - The Verge https://t.co/T4MTbNiEug
— James Pethokoukis (@JimPethokoukis) May 28, 2020