.png "back to home page")
“The U.S. government now says APT10 took detailed personnel records of more than 100,000 people from the U.S. Navy.” https://t.co/LJqhSwlKGB
— John Batchelor (@batchelorshow) December 31, 2019
Well, this is concerning. "A Wall Street Journal investigation has found that the attack was much bigger than previously known. It goes far beyond the 14 unnamed companies listed in the indictment, stretching across at least a dozen cloud providers" https://t.co/XvoJgeJ1uf
— Peter Tinti (@petertinti) December 30, 2019
'In one of the largest-ever corporate espionage efforts, cyberattackers working for China’s intelligence services stole volumes of IP from scores of companies. They came in through cloud service providers, where cos thought their data was safely stored.' https://t.co/2xTJMXXSK1
— Jesse Felder (@jessefelder) December 31, 2019
“The final tally of the Cloud Hopper campaign—both in the total potential access to networks and how much data China ultimately stole—remains unknown to researchers and Western officials.” https://t.co/aI4qN5k5TL
— Phillip Carter (@Carter_PE) December 31, 2019
Chinese hackers are believed to have accessed the secrets of far more big Western companies than previously known—Rio Tinto, Philips, American Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Allianz, GlaxoSmithKline—slipping in through their cloud service providers.@dnvolz https://t.co/CJQNnnikb3
— Jonathan Cheng (@JChengWSJ) December 31, 2019
This is outright damning for at least one of the cloud providers mentioned. Embarrassing that companies don’t log and audit the way they should in the cloud. https://t.co/S95zs1vhCh
— mitchparkerciso (@mitchparkerciso) December 31, 2019
How long until we start seeing companies rejecting storing data on cloud servers and instead going back to their own hardware? https://t.co/W7PNRVsBxx
— James Cook (@JamesLiamCook) December 31, 2019
WHOA - Chinese intelligence hacked: IBM, Rio Tinto, Philips, American Airlines Group Inc., Deutsche Bank AG , Allianz SE and GlaxoSmithKline, more https://t.co/4ZblAIOkyM
— Eric Garland (@ericgarland) December 30, 2019
New: WSJ investigation into China’s Cloud Hopper cyber espionage campaign finds a scope of victims broader than known, as service providers struggled to kick out hackers. U.S. officials over time grew panicked about federal agency exposure. W/ @rob_barry https://t.co/Kr05BErVLS
— Dustin Volz (@dnvolz) December 30, 2019
"The Journal found that Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. was so overrun that the cloud company didn’t see the hackers re-enter their clients’ networks, even as the company gave customers the all-clear." https://t.co/Kr05BErVLS https://t.co/rGBz4YrE2H
— Dustin Volz (@dnvolz) December 30, 2019
???Major US companies breached, robbed, and spied on by Chinese hackershttps://t.co/qacfinlMkt
— ??Marine⚓Gun?? (@DDonsmith007) December 30, 2019
Great reporting. https://t.co/7Jt8Y2NByd
— Zach Dorfman (@zachsdorfman) December 31, 2019
Ghosts in the Clouds: Inside China’s Major Corporate Hack https://t.co/IwCwn0uUOh pic.twitter.com/SFxYdI1T4E
— Lions' Den (@LionsDen45) December 31, 2019
Great piece by WSJ and all involved. The only annoyance is that they paint cloud to be really bad, which assumes on-prem is a huge better and that’s so far from reality. Enterprise truly sucks at the basics no matter the environment. https://t.co/RLjc6ojsK5
— Daniel Cuthbert (@dcuthbert) December 31, 2019
Chinese hackers are believed to have accessed the secrets of far more big Western companies than previously known—Rio Tinto, Philips, American Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Allianz, GlaxoSmithKline—slipping in through their cloud service providers.@dnvolz https://t.co/CJQNnnikb3
— Jonathan Cheng (@JChengWSJ) December 31, 2019
This is a must read from @WSJ - “investigation finds that the Cloud Hopper hack was much bigger than previously known, involving at least a dozen cloud companies.” https://t.co/WzPxZWkOVa
— Theresa Payton ✪ (@TrackerPayton) December 31, 2019
New, from me and the inimitable @dnvolz https://t.co/qgmIdFI7EZ
— Rob Barry (@rob_barry) December 30, 2019
“The final tally of the Cloud Hopper campaign—both in the total potential access to networks and how much data China ultimately stole—remains unknown to researchers and Western officials.” https://t.co/aI4qN5k5TL
— Phillip Carter (@Carter_PE) December 31, 2019
How long until we start seeing companies rejecting storing data on cloud servers and instead going back to their own hardware? https://t.co/W7PNRVsBxx
— James Cook (@JamesLiamCook) December 31, 2019
"Investigators in and out of government said many of the major cloud companies tried to stonewall clients about what was happening inside their networks. 'It was like trying to pin down quicksand,' one investigator said." https://t.co/8H07ds2qwr
— Blake Sobczak (@BlakeSobczak) December 30, 2019
Ghosts in the Clouds: Inside China’s Major Corporate Hack
— Florian Roth (@cyb3rops) December 31, 2019
A Journal investigation finds the Cloud Hopper attack was much bigger than previously knownhttps://t.co/mEDfe3imeI
A WSJ investigation finds that the Cloud Hopper hack was much bigger than previously known, involving at least a dozen cloud companies. https://t.co/YAD6Ecl9Oc
— bob davis (@bobdavis187) December 31, 2019
“The Journal’s investigation identified hundreds of firms that had relationships with #BreachedCloudProviders, including #RioTinto, #Philips, #AmericanAirlines Group Inc., #DeutscheBank AG , #AllianzSE and #GlaxoSmithKline PLC.” https://t.co/sL7eqV8LCG @Tentoads4truth
— Lovetogive2 (@lovetogive2) December 31, 2019
Head in the clouds!
— Eliot Brown (@eliotwb) December 30, 2019
good read from @dnvolz and @rob_barry on a giant Chinese espionage campaign inside HPE and others https://t.co/YurvdALKfX
All the big security news today points to one big thing: the US has a long way to go.
— Jeff Stone (@jeffstone500) December 30, 2019
Here's @JennaMC_Laugh @zachsdorfman on how digital breadcrumbs rendered CIA methods extinct. https://t.co/Ype3pdRYqh
And @dnvolz on Chinese spies lurking in the cloud. https://t.co/We7RDBUbRi
APT10's attacked numerous firms using the cloud. The attacks were extensive and took place over several years. #CyberSecurity #infosec https://t.co/GN4JCuUIyr
— James Voorhees (@jimvoor) December 31, 2019
@jmulvenon https://t.co/wwuyAXHAmX
— Charles R. Smith? (@softwarnet) December 31, 2019
Ghosts in the Clouds: Inside China’s Major Corporate Hack
A Journal investigation finds the Cloud Hopper attack was much bigger than previously known
Go read this ‘Cloud Hopper’ hacking investigation by the WSJ https://t.co/RQN922aZBT pic.twitter.com/vRyFKJNVpN
— The Verge (@verge) December 31, 2019
중국의 해커들이 미국의 주요 회사를 습격, 염탐하고 강탈했습니다. https://t.co/hvV6jiOKth
— editoy (@editoy) January 1, 2020
• 국토 안보부 관계자는 클라우드 기업의 저항에 매우 좌절했기 때문에 현재 연방 정부와 계약을 해결하기 위해 노력하고 있으며, 미래의 조사에는 따르도록 강제될겁니다.
https://t.co/LH3ps1NM91
— Luke Slytalker & The Force (@_Luke_Slytalker) January 1, 2020
Pretty BIG...
Major US companies breached, robbed, and spied on by Chinese hackers https://t.co/atTvCIiGdJ
— Aryeh Goretsky (@goretsky) January 1, 2020
Major US companies breached, robbed, and spied on by Chinese hackers - Fox Business #cybersec #cybersecurity https://t.co/ib5t1TBGWd
— CyberSecurity (@CyberSecUpdate) December 31, 2019
Major US companies breached, robbed, and spied on by Chinese hackers https://t.co/0ivWYhmIhR#Cybersecurity #cybercrime #cyberattacks #hacker #hack #breach #phishing #dos #ransomware #malware #virus #apt #pii #nist #fcc #finra #hipaa #pci pic.twitter.com/UsJhoBnuuR
— Rich Tehrani (@rtehrani) January 1, 2020
If this had been an invasion by Chinese marines without response from the military everyone would have been fired, but since it only involves our company’s and individual’s data it’s fine to let companies deal with it. This is why we are losing this war. https://t.co/F9LGJQSmO7
— Gen (Ret) Rob Spalding (@robert_spalding) December 31, 2019
1-A WSJ investigation finds that the Cloud Hopper hack was much bigger than previously known, involving at least a dozen cloud companies.They came in through cloud service providers,where companies thought their data was safely stored..... https://t.co/uRbFaXkoeU
— Dan DiMicco (@DanRDimicco) December 31, 2019
Wow. Per WSJ, the Cloud Hopper cyberattack carried out by China's state-sponsored group APT10 was much worse than initially reported.
— Caroline Orr (@RVAwonk) December 31, 2019
The hack affected hundreds of top American companies, making it "one of the largest-ever corporate espionage efforts."https://t.co/eQEK8Yu0GV
Ghosts in the Clouds: Inside China’s Major Corporate Hack
— Karol Cummins (@karolcummins) December 31, 2019
A Journal investigation finds the Cloud Hopper attack was much bigger than previously knownhttps://t.co/ZFqYjrxveV
A WSJ investigation finds that the Cloud Hopper hack was much bigger than previously known, involving at least a dozen cloud companies.
— Lucia A. Walinchus (@SoSaysLucia) December 30, 2019
—-
And still possibly ongoing! https://t.co/7IIK08hO48
A WSJ investigation finds that the Cloud Hopper hack was much bigger than previously known, involving at least a dozen cloud companies. https://t.co/PLlkjq2wSt
— Bojan Tunguz (@tunguz) December 31, 2019
A @WSJ investigation finds Cloud Hopper attack, allegedly linked to China, was much bigger than previously known. Goes far beyond the 14 unnamed firms listed in indictment, includes a dozen cloud providers. Important story from @rob_barry and @dnvolz https://t.co/PkiYwEPLN9 pic.twitter.com/C2OKxFsKKW
— Newley Purnell (@newley) January 1, 2020
Go read this ‘Cloud Hopper’ hacking investigation by the WSJ https://t.co/weRlVQAW9F
— The Cyber Security Hub (@TheCyberSecHub) December 31, 2019