.png "back to home page")
Login to comment
"[Mark Zuckerberg’s] speech also received plenty of negative responses, but most were not visible during the talk because of how the algorithms behind a live stream with tens of thousands of viewers work."
— Kontra (@counternotions) October 18, 2019
(Algoriddims.) https://t.co/6qEylQEn0J
When I watched Facebook’s livestream of the Zuck lecture on free speech, all I saw was a stream of ?s & ❤️s.
— Geoffrey A. Fowler (@geoffreyfowler) October 17, 2019
So I left an ? and ... it didn't show up.
As @heatherkelly discovered, this is how Facebook thinks "free speech" is supposed to work: https://t.co/oVaLFVmdih
https://t.co/mtQGvC5uolhttps://t.co/mtQGvC5uol
— Jocelyn (@JocelynHampto14) October 18, 2019
ARE YOU KIDDING ME? RIGGED COMMENTS?
On Facebook’s live stream, Zuckerberg’s free-speech lecture got a big thumbs up.
Viewers ONLY saw positive comments during the live stream.
Negative comments were shown after speech ended. https://t.co/vuO0su2wZs
Viewers saw nearly entirely positive comments and emoji because: algorithms. https://t.co/TVCzH8PgXl
— Teddy Amenabar (@TeddyAmen) October 17, 2019
This is similar to how the Uber map was found not to be showing the real-time location of cars. The 'thumbs-up' and 'heart' emojis floating over a FB video aren't a reflection of real-time reax, and the algorithm in this case filtered out angry/sad faces https://t.co/AoX4K2I7YL
— Faiz Siddiqui (@faizsays) October 17, 2019
This makes me ? but if you’re seeing this on Facebook you might see ? https://t.co/C1oggXR8L5
— Shawn DuBravac, PhD (@shawndubravac) October 18, 2019
Facebook's idea of "Freedom of Speech": https://t.co/cxm5gIqyG2 pic.twitter.com/dbU1Zb1WIg
— Jesse Felder (@jessefelder) October 18, 2019
Allegory https://t.co/eqG3XFjugT
— Don T Bother (@fakeryanmills) October 17, 2019
“There were also plenty of negative responses, but most were not visible during the talk because of how the algorithms behind a live stream with tens of thousands of viewers work.” @washingtonpost https://t.co/H5qodmcHkj
— Garreth Hanley (@GarrethHanley) October 18, 2019
Read this thread... https://t.co/ins0qFhkDH
— Rachel Maddow MSNBC (@maddow) October 18, 2019
So it's free speech for Zuck but censorship for others??"The Facebook chief executive’s speech also received plenty of negative responses, but most were not visible during the talk.." https://t.co/VHp4Durj8h
— Mia Dand **offline** (@MiaD) October 18, 2019
As Zuckerberg, in a live Broadcast, touted Facebook’s role in protecting free speech, the company’s own algorithm automatically removed nearly all comments that were critical of his talk. From @heatherkelly https://t.co/oUa2iNxczh
— Reed Albergotti (@ReedAlbergotti) October 18, 2019
Why did Facebook show almost entirely positive comments on Zuckerberg's live-streamed free speech talk? It's just the algorithm, you see... https://t.co/6O8cpjULMN
— Heather Kelly (@heatherkelly) October 17, 2019
Well, who is surprised that the algorithms filtered data? https://t.co/rQsj68hx61
— Heather M Roff (@HMRoff) October 18, 2019
As Zuckerberg, in a live Broadcast, touted Facebook’s role in protecting free speech, the company’s own algorithm automatically removed nearly all comments that were critical of his talk. From @heatherkelly https://t.co/oUa2iNxczh
— Reed Albergotti (@ReedAlbergotti) October 18, 2019
Zuckerberg says Facebook plays a critical role in safeguarding democratic values online.
— Nicholas Miller (@nicholasrmiller) October 18, 2019
Whereas the truth is that Facebook completely undermines democracy.https://t.co/UWpGwXiV9l via @WSJ
One Zuckerberg quote that will stick with me: “People having the power to express themselves at scale is a new kind of force in the world. It is a Fifth Estate alongside the other power structures of society.” Read more from @WSJ here: https://t.co/U2K98fH8Ld
— Deepa Seetharaman (@dseetharaman) October 17, 2019
“I believe we must continue to stand for free expression,” Mark Zuckerberg says in speech at Georgetown | "Continue"? https://t.co/0pRHLtfvlI
— Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) October 17, 2019
バタバタして気づかなかったですが、
— TAKA / 海外スタートアップ??✈️ (@RouteXstartups) October 18, 2019
MarkがGeorgetown Universityでスピーチしてたんですね！
政治に対するテック企業の在り方について話してます??
いろんな記事読んでみたんですが、@WSJが一番分かりやすかったです！#MarkZuckerberghttps://t.co/Q2Ckl1aCnM
I’m all for free speech. But nowhere is it in our Constitution that free speech should be conducted anonymously or by malign foreign actors who falsify their identities. Or did I miss something? https://t.co/70CfheIjGe
— Sam Brannen (@samwashdc) October 18, 2019
“I believe we must continue to stand for free expression,” Mark Zuckerberg says in speech at Georgetown https://t.co/csd7g19Khw ザッカーバーグが拒否。民主党左派 vs. FBが激化しそうですね…。文脈は2016年大統領でのフェイクニュースを発端とする歪んだ政治的な広告をめぐる論争なのに…
— Yuta Kashino (@yutakashino) October 17, 2019
Who would have that that Faceberg, of all people, would be the one to hold onto reality the longest?https://t.co/91sCwFYnGu
— Lord Victor (@lordvictor) October 17, 2019
Zuck: “Some people believe that giving more people a voice is driving division...”
— Parmy Olson (@parmy) October 17, 2019
Regulators: Yeh but can we see the algorithms that amplify certain voices to millions and keep them addicted to-
Zuck: “Stop curbing free speech!” https://t.co/Rc4sRMGRlJ
As regulatory debate continues, @Facebook CEO is clear: “I believe we must continue to stand for free expression,” Mark Zuckerberg says in speech at Georgetown https://t.co/kGb2cR2L0h via @WSJ . #mpol385 @twadhwa
— Holli Semetko (@HolliSemetko) October 17, 2019
Login to comment
So it's free speech for Zuck but censorship for others??"The Facebook chief executive’s speech also received plenty of negative responses, but most were not visible during the talk.." https://t.co/VHp4Durj8h
— Mia Dand **offline** (@MiaD) October 18, 2019
Login to comment