.png "back to home page")
Login to comment
Apple's secretive program came in dead last, with a disengagement every 1.1 miles. That seems miserably bad, but again—there's little context here. Apple's team is relatively new, and they could buy almost every other company on the list if so inclined https://t.co/ZQz7Rqvg3u 5/ pic.twitter.com/APabbflR44
— Tom Randall (@tsrandall) February 13, 2019
Well that's embarrassing! Apple Reports Self-Driving Car Disengagements to DMV, Earns Worst Rank https://t.co/q3hrdrrDPn
— Michael Kukielka (@DetroitBORG) February 13, 2019
Nothing as informative as the annual disengagement charts (how many kilometers autonomous vehicles covered on average before a human had to intervene) of the California DMV - Waymo/Alphabet: 17846.8 km, Mercedes Benz: 2.3 km https://t.co/te2epGmzoj
— Sascha Pohflepp (@plugimi) February 13, 2019
California’s self-driving car reports are imperfect, but they’re better than nothing https://t.co/WoxWmQPiPp pic.twitter.com/qglCHskprB
— The Verge (@verge) February 13, 2019
Here are the reports: https://t.co/WuK2iJmhAk.
— Tom Randall (@tsrandall) February 13, 2019
Waymo's statement: https://t.co/yXGoyczZZ6
More from Bloomberg: https://t.co/XGZ63YhkAJ
(Note: many AV programs don't test in California (Tesla, Daimler, etc). Just one of many reasons why these data are mostly anecdotal) 6/
Apple's Autonomous Cars Need Much More Human Help Than Its Rivals https://t.co/bkob2mXhJD
— Mark Gurman (@markgurman) February 13, 2019
Apple's vehicle AI lost its nerve and handed control back to a human almost once every mile in 2018. Waymo's only did it once every 11,000 miles. This is a massive and bewildering gap, and honestly deserves an explanation from Apple. https://t.co/5cBjuG4dnf
— Gerrit De Vynck (@GerritD) February 13, 2019
compare and contrast $GOOG $TSLAhttps://t.co/hUAhtKu4nw
— zach (@zbiotech) February 13, 2019
Apple autonomous test vehicles are relying on significantly more human intervention than Alphabet ’s Waymo or GM’s Cruise cars https://t.co/y3yhTlDQRO
— Bloomberg Hyperdrive (@hyper_drive) February 13, 2019
Apple's vehicle AI lost its nerve and handed control back to a human almost once every mile in 2018. Waymo's only did it once every 11,000 miles. This is a massive and bewildering gap, and honestly deserves an explanation from Apple. https://t.co/5cBjuG4dnf
— Gerrit De Vynck (@GerritD) February 13, 2019
ICYMI: Apple’s self-driving car project isn’t quite ready for prime time https://t.co/7rqJq8lwrk by @lukedormehl pic.twitter.com/MhZeR0ILju
— Cult of Mac (@cultofmac) February 13, 2019
Apple’s self-driving car project isn’t quite ready for prime time https://t.co/7rqJq8lwrk by @lukedormehl pic.twitter.com/NU9rMLUafb
— Cult of Mac (@cultofmac) February 13, 2019
California’s self-driving car reports are imperfect, but they’re better than nothing https://t.co/LjurdUnO1K
— Rich Tehrani (@rtehrani) February 14, 2019
ICYMI - Apple’s self-driving car project isn’t quite ready for prime time https://t.co/7rqJq8lwrk by @lukedormehl
— Cult of Mac (@cultofmac) February 14, 2019
I know it's not necessarily, er, apples to apples, but still wow, seems like Apple and Uber have a mountain of work to do to catch up: 1.8 and 0.6(!) km/disengagement vs. a whopping 18,000 km/d for Waymo. No, none of those are typos. https://t.co/jkly8JWvwu
— Jon Evans (@rezendi) February 13, 2019
Login to comment