*purposely choosing names. https://t.co/xIrhfjFz9m

— drew olanoff (@yoda) June 21, 2019

I am a Tesla owner and I endorse this: Tesla never should have named the current feature “autopilot” and it is morally reckless to have done it in the first place; it’s further wrong to continue to call it that. https://t.co/EkGUs4JR0y

— Dan Becker (@doofusdan) June 21, 2019

Tesla's response to today's survey results: https://t.co/hBbucHYBFx pic.twitter.com/705eNnEVTP

— Matt Drange (@mattdrange) June 20, 2019

Despite the limitations of today's level 2 automation systems, some of their names seem to overpromise when it comes to the degree to which the driver can shift their attention away from the road. https://t.co/J7rnU2dp0d pic.twitter.com/qFSKGpOKQZ

— IIHS (@IIHS_autosafety) June 20, 2019

IIHS News: Studies highlight driver confusion about automated systems https://t.co/J7rnU2dp0d pic.twitter.com/7TJIUEf87e

— IIHS (@IIHS_autosafety) June 20, 2019

Thirty-three percent of survey respondents said they'd be comfortable taking their hands off the steering wheel while using a system called ProPilot Assist. https://t.co/J7rnU2dp0d pic.twitter.com/RW9tmS2qxL

— IIHS (@IIHS_autosafety) June 21, 2019

My students have spent a few months doing a deep dive with these systems - we’re classifying mental models & user errors.

It isn’t easy to understand these systems - even as a research task.

Lay users don’t stand a chance... This is dangerous.https://t.co/3ZpyEtwWX1

— Anuj K Pradhan PhD (@DriverScience) June 21, 2019

New studies highlight driver confusion about automated systems : consumers acceptance should be part any #automation road map https://t.co/XeTmJJDWWE - @IIHS_autosafety #RoadSafety

— Luca Pascotto (@lucapascotto) June 21, 2019

Two new IIHS studies highlight driver confusion about automated systems. https://t.co/J7rnU2dp0d pic.twitter.com/tp4T4KMw4A

— IIHS (@IIHS_autosafety) June 20, 2019

When asked whether it would be safe to take one's hands off the wheel while using the technology, 48% of people asked about Autopilot said they thought it would be, compared with 33% or fewer for the other systems. https://t.co/J7rnU2dp0d pic.twitter.com/C8r81igVza

— IIHS (@IIHS_autosafety) June 20, 2019

no kiddinghttps://t.co/BLc8mQPQj6 pic.twitter.com/ecurJfiyTY

— Jonathon Owen (@ArrantPedantry) June 21, 2019

「米IIHSの調査によると、メーカー名を隠し”オートパイロット(テスラ)”とだけ知らされた消費者の実に48%が手放し運転が可能な機能と勘違いし、6%は居眠り運転さえ可能と思い込んだ。興味が深いことにキャデラックの”スーパークルーズ”を手放し運転可能とした人は27%だった」 https://t.co/eCTa5C5QyE

— フラとこ (@fratoko) June 20, 2019

Study suggests that people are still wildly unaware of the differences between #selfdriving cars and driver assistance systems: https://t.co/3ZNix9s0Uu

— Mi Ae Lipe (@DrivingReal) June 21, 2019

Confusion Between #SelfDrivingCars and #DriverAssistance Systems Is Still Rampant: Study https://t.co/yajw5jjpk1 @alanisnking @jalopnik #fintech #Insurtech #AutonomousVehicles pic.twitter.com/bvM1E1t9lF

— Spiros Margaris (@SpirosMargaris) June 20, 2019

https://t.co/jOlaiDV5p4@AlexRoy144, @kirstenkorosec, @Tweetermeyer @TheAutonocast @antonwahlman all do a great do a job of shining a flashlight on the fact that we have no self-driving cars the public can buy today.

For consumers: you did not buy a self-driving car.

— Ajay Juneja (@ajayjuneja) June 20, 2019

People rely on brand names to inform them on what their semi-autonomous driving systems can and can't do, and it confuses the hell out of them https://t.co/kBZWdQBpWa

— Aaron W. Gordon (@A_W_Gordon) June 20, 2019

The names automakers give to their advanced driver assistance systems can send the wrong message about their capabilities. https://t.co/MBuBnSfZCS

— IIHS (@IIHS_autosafety) June 21, 2019