High stakes: Huawei ups the ante by filing new legal action in a bid to expedite its lawsuit against the U.S. government. #HuaweiFacts https://t.co/DvOJZwCPaJ

— Huawei Facts (@HuaweiFacts) May 29, 2019

BREAKING: “The addition of #Huawei to the (black list) is a dangerous move because they have disregarded facts and evidence,” Huawei’s chief legal officer told me.

Company is considering legal action against Entity List, first time made such commentshttps://t.co/QGJ5xoHarW

— Arjun Kharpal (@ArjunKharpal) May 29, 2019

Chinese tech giant Huawei says it's filed a motion in a U.S. court seeking to challenge United States legislation that places it on a trade blacklisthttps://t.co/IeL3eGtKJ4

— Axios (@axios) May 29, 2019

Huawei is challenging its US contracting ban as unconstitutional https://t.co/gVNPtRK8mC pic.twitter.com/LtGm2O1eyv

— The Verge (@verge) May 29, 2019

Huawei is challenging its US contracting ban as unconstitutional https://t.co/n7tacsjyNY pic.twitter.com/5USCF8I6BP

— Geeman Yip (@GeemanYip) May 29, 2019

Top @huawei lawyer continues US media blitz in @wsj oped: "U.S. courts should declare the Huawei ban unconstitutional" https://t.co/hmlVGRgPG3

— Julian Ku 古舉倫 (@julianku) May 28, 2019

“The U.S. government has provided no evidence to show that Huawei is a security threat,” Huawei’s chief legal officer said. “There is no gun, no smoke. Only speculation.” https://t.co/PId3odI9ne

— The New York Times (@nytimes) May 29, 2019

Legal scholars say Huawei's push could help the company avoid discovery, which would allow the U.S. to demand evidence from Huawei about its technology and business practices https://t.co/a6qRfDxapY

— NYT Business (@nytimesbusiness) May 29, 2019

How does one say “chutzpah” in Mandarin? https://t.co/MhK0w5T5AE

— Benjamin Weingarten (@bhweingarten) May 28, 2019

Huawei warns ban will hit 1,200 US suppliers including companies that provide the backbone of the company's cyber security system. Two thirds of the 19 commercial cyber security tools used by HW come from US suppliers. Scoop by @louiseflucas @JKynge & me https://t.co/DDpbFIoE25

— Sue-Lin Wong 黄淑琳 (@suelinwong) May 29, 2019

“The U.S. government has provided no evidence to show that Huawei is a security threat”: Huawei Chief Legal Officer Song Liuping announces the filing of a motion for summary judgment to end the unfair treatment of the tech giant: https://t.co/wjBDp9kgak pic.twitter.com/MzFz5hYNoh

— Huawei IT (@Huaweiit) May 29, 2019

The Huawei saga continues. In this episode H files for a speedy, dramatic close to its lawsuit against the USG. Will it help Huawei avoid discovery? Will it get Huawei splashy time in front of a judge? Or will the dastardly US courts force a full trial? https://t.co/lnj7xR43y1

— Paul Mozur (@paulmozur) May 29, 2019

The bottom line: “Section 889 [of the 2019 NDAA] is the classic ‘trial by legislature’ that the United States Constitution forbids,” says Glen Nager, lead counsel for #Huawei. #HuaweiFacts https://t.co/BUgnaSp93G pic.twitter.com/7iogcIalGE

— Huawei Facts (@HuaweiFacts) May 29, 2019

Huawei files motion against US declaring law as 'unconstitutional' https://t.co/n7Iu32PLc5 by @campbell_kwan

— ZDNet (@ZDNet) May 29, 2019

Huawei warns ban set to hurt 1,200 US suppliers https://t.co/pZlUoQC1sw

— FT Economics (@fteconomics) May 29, 2019

FT: "Two-thirds of the 19 commercial cyber security software tools that Huawei uses come from US suppliers and one-quarter of the roughly 200m smartphones it shipped last year contained chips from Qualcomm...” https://t.co/nbWWp9JspS

— Chris Hoofnagle (@hoofnagle) May 29, 2019

Huawei, which is already facing the prospect of being shut out of Google’s Android smartphone operating system, warned that the impact of the ban could extend beyond handsets to software used in its equipment and other businesses https://t.co/AXsenhHFkZ

— Financial Times (@FinancialTimes) May 29, 2019

I offer more Huawei takes for the New York Times: "“Avoiding discovery is really important for Huawei. It is both time consuming and invasive,” said Julian Ku, a professor of law at Hofstra... https://t.co/ZPbsZlFe6j“Avoiding

— Julian Ku 古舉倫 (@julianku) May 29, 2019

New lawsuit aims to block Trump's move to

*checks notes*

keep Chinese espionage products out of US communications infrastructure https://t.co/h4pJfcbRZm

— Omri Ceren (@omriceren) May 29, 2019

#Huawei accelerates lawsuit against #WhiteHouse - keeping the challenge in the public eyehttps://t.co/gPDI3z6Fle

— Trade Record (@TradeRecord_io) May 29, 2019

Huawei hires new lawyer?
?
Huawei asks US courts for summary judgment on its move to get federal ban on its gear overturned | South China Morning Post https://t.co/Aa7N1twdnn

— BenTallmadge (@BenKTallmadge) May 29, 2019

#China's Huawei has filed a motion asking US courts for a summary judgment on its move to get a US ban on #Huawei equipment for federal agencies and contractors overturned. https://t.co/2h6FlGQYzF via @scmpnews

— Patricia M Thornton (@PM_Thornton) May 29, 2019

"The fact is, the US government has provided no evidence to show that Huawei is a security threat. There is no gun, no smoke. Only speculation." - Song Liuping, #Huawei chief legal officer, in Shenzhen on Wednesday https://t.co/iohory9iEP pic.twitter.com/aK3TduHpMJ

— SCMP Tech (@SCMPTech) May 29, 2019

Huawei asks US courts for summary judgment on its move to get federal ban on its gear overturned. https://t.co/gVvdKBKu55

— Murtaza Solangi (@murtazasolangi) May 29, 2019

Love the video of @chuakongho and @zensoo making sense of the nonsensical https://t.co/Os7d5A0L48 via @scmpnews

— Peter Elstrom (@pelstrom) May 29, 2019

The US 2019 National Defense Authorization Act’s ban on #Huawei is a quintessential bill of attainder and a violation of due process. Perversely, it undermines US technological and economic interests. Huawei's Chief Legal Officer Song Liuping explains. https://t.co/MXqDFAGOnw

— Huawei Facts (@HuaweiFacts) May 28, 2019

Can't really feel too badly for this guy since I'm sure he's well-compensated, but it has to be tough for a lawyer to operate in a jurisdiction in which the law changes on Party whim. I'm sure he's much happier in the US where the words mean something. https://t.co/LszfjE67Au

— Joe Moschella (@joemosch) May 28, 2019