.png "back to home page")
Login to comment
Epic v Apple is really revealing the limits of US antitrust law (and US judges’ understanding of the digital economy). First, the judge seems obsessed with the “clean hands” equity doctrine… https://t.co/stI7cCpZnm
— Ian Brown (@1Br0wn) September 29, 2020
Epic’s decision to bypass Apple’s App Store policies were dishonest, says US judge https://t.co/4tDzkukhBh pic.twitter.com/qV94rlrt0l
— The Verge (@verge) September 29, 2020
Epic’s decision to bypass Apple’s App Store policies were dishonest, says US judge https://t.co/lgG5n1gCEn
— THE RED DRAGON (@TWTHEREDDRAGON) September 29, 2020
Die Richterin im Fall Apple ./. Epic (Fortnite) hat Epic erst mal zur Schnecke gemacht: „You did something, you lied about it by omission, by not being forthcoming. That’s the security issue!“
— Gilly Vanilly ? (@GillyBerlin) September 29, 2020
Auch der Rest ist lesenswert:https://t.co/vO080djDTc
Login to comment
에픽과 애플의 소송에서 판사는 적어도 에픽의 주장에 크게 동하지 않은 모양이네요. https://t.co/dT5jIk4oCt pic.twitter.com/LnGRsLe7VS
— 푸른곰 (@purengom) September 29, 2020
AppleのAppStoreポリシーを回避するエピックの決定は不正であった、と判事。これを見る限り、日本でスーパーアプリをやって、ミニプログラム内でアプリ内購入が生じたときに年貢を納めないと、Appleが提訴してきて敗訴することになる未来が浮かんでくる。厳しい。 https://t.co/shCTTknezT
— Yoshi 吉田拓史 (@taxiyoshida) September 30, 2020
Login to comment