IBM은 CEO가 편견과 불평등을 호소함에 따라 모든 얼굴 인식 사업을 종료

newsroom 6/10 '20 posted 뉴스 IT

• 크리슈나 사장은“더 이상 범용 IBM 얼굴 인식 또는 분석 소프트웨어를 제공하지 않는다.

• “IBM은 다른 벤더가 제공하는 안면 인식 기술을 포함하여 대량 감시, 인종 프로파일링, 기본 인권 및 자유의 위반, 또는 당사의 신뢰와 투명성 가치 및 원칙과 일치하지 않는 목적을 위해 어떠한 기술도 사용하는 것을 강력하게 반대하고 용납하지 않습니다.”이라고 덧붙였습니다.

• “우리는 지금 국내 법 집행 기관이 얼굴 인식 기술을 사용해야하는지 여부와 방법에 대한 전국적인 대화를 시작할 때가되었다고 생각합니다.

• 얼굴 인식 소프트웨어는 인공 지능의 발전으로 지난 10 년 동안 크게 개선되었습니다.

• IBM은 더 이상 범용 IBM 얼굴 인식 또는 분석 소프트웨어를 제공하지 않습니다.

• 마지막으로, 국가 정책은 또한 바디 카메라와 최신 데이터 분석 기술 등 경찰에 투명성과 책임을 가지고 기술의 사용을 장려하고 홍보해야합니다.

• IBM은 더 이상 기술을 개발하거나 연구하지 않을 것이라고 The Verge에 말합니다.

IBM ends all facial recognition business as CEO calls out bias and inequality [techcrunch.com]

Engadget The Morning After [www.engadget.com]

IBM is exiting the face recognition business [www.axios.com]

IBM Will No Longer Develop Facial Recognition Tech [www.digitaltrends.com]

IBM quits facial-recognition market over police racial-profiling concerns [www.theguardian.com]

IBM pulls out of facial recognition, fearing racial profiling and mass surveillance [fortune.com]

IBM will no longer offer, develop, or research facial recognition technology [www.theverge.com]

IBM says it is no longer working on face recognition because it’s used for racial profiling [www.technologyreview.com]

IBM CEO's Letter to Congress on Racial Justice Reform [www.ibm.com]

IBM asks Congress for police reform, leaves facial recognition business [arstechnica.com]

IBM turns away from facial recognition business amid public furore over racial profiling and surveillance [www.scmp.com]

IBM terminates facial recognition technology business [thehill.com]

IBM quits facial recognition, joins call for police reforms [www.wishtv.com]

IBM will no longer develop or research facial recognition tech [finance.yahoo.com]

IBM Will No Longer Offer Or Develop Facial Recognition Software In Pursuit Of Racial Justice Reform [www.forbes.com]

IBM Will No Longer Develop Facial Recognition Tech [www.insidehook.com]

newest replies popular replies

Open Wiki - Feel free to edit it. -

6/10 '20 answered

Be cautious. Be skeptical. But read the whole letter and HOLD THEM TO IT. Again: Arguably THE biggest, longest lasting name in Facial Rec said "No, we won't do it, it's bad."

That's huge.https://t.co/7mO84cS1oC
— Damien is just so effing exhausted. (@Wolven) June 9, 2020

"IBM firmly opposes and will not condone uses of any technology, including facial recognition tech offered by other vendors, for mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of basic human rights and freedoms…” said @IBM CEO @ArvindKrishna in a letter to Congress. @IBMpolicy https://t.co/aqEujYQzwm
— kirsten graham (@kirstengraham) June 8, 2020

Very interesting letter from IBM — and +1 on this (tho already a bit late):

“We believe now is the time to begin a national dialogue on whether and how facial recognition technology should be employed by domestic law enforcement agencies.” https://t.co/C0cFFwUAKT
— Molly McKew (@MollyMcKew) June 9, 2020

wondering if this is code for "we couldn't wring out those false positives and the potential for product liability lawsuits was looking scary" https://t.co/Dfa2fp8tt3 (via @gretared @lorenschmidt @SumitGup &c)
— Dorian Taylor (@doriantaylor) June 9, 2020

“We believe now is the time to begin a national dialogue on whether and how facial recognition technology should be employed by domestic law enforcement agencies.”https://t.co/ft8Rc3qUF4
— Dino A. Dai Zovi (@dinodaizovi) June 9, 2020

Will the Indian tech dictators learn anything from the world or continue to push #facialrecognition in the name of contactless governance. https://t.co/wXcxpVoxxb
— Srinivas Kodali (@digitaldutta) June 9, 2020

And the previous 109 years of work? All the infrastructure IBM has built, systems IBM has maintained, ideas IBM has seeded, narratives IBM has constructed? Gonna remain silent on that? Let the past be the past? Bravely look to the future? Yeah, thought so. https://t.co/F0BZH9nnaj
— Jathan Sadowski (@jathansadowski) June 9, 2020

This huge #IBM move will force other large tech companies to take a stand, even if their silence is their statement. https://t.co/GRRO5IBOye
— Jessi Hempel (@jessiwrites) June 9, 2020

If the Americans won’t advance this technology, the Chinese will. And it will become yet another thing Americans import from China. https://t.co/1lPbqYvOxg
— Mustapha Hamoui (@Beirutspring) June 9, 2020

A pro-human rights move over 80 years after its chairman got a medal from Hitler. So better very very late than never. https://t.co/Z5JagQxphV
— Chandra Steele (@ChanSteele) June 8, 2020

Thread: IBM is doing away with its facial recognition technology business and has called for a "national dialogue" on how face rec should be employed by law enforcement. This is a big deal for communities of color in the US. A few thoughts on this. https://t.co/uGkUJKOj6o
— Megha Rajagopalan ? (@meghara) June 9, 2020

"yeah, y'know, we already contributed to one of the most notorious genocides in human history by selling computers to literal Nazis. maybe we should sit this one out" https://t.co/RfvJxnBfce
— ★ Alice D @ #EndlessSuffering2020 ★ (@AmyZenunim) June 9, 2020

Another example of business leaders realizing after harm has been, that tech is NOT neutral https://t.co/jpzk42KO93
— Kim Crayton [She/Her] ? ??#causeascene (@KimCrayton1) June 9, 2020

Wow. IBM's CEO says the company will no longer sell facial recognition services, calling for a “national dialogue” on whether it should be used at all, citing concerns re "mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of basic human rights and freedoms"https://t.co/aahGKMFSyw
— Nadia Daly (@nadiasdaly) June 9, 2020

Your turn now, Amazon. https://t.co/J2Rf4wyOwK
— Fabio Chiusi (@fabiochiusi) June 9, 2020

This is brilliant:

1) Fall woefully behind in a technology
2) Realize that you have no chance of ever catching up
3) Declare that the technology that you can't do is evil and promise to do no more of it
4) Write a letter to Congress
5) Profit! https://t.co/YggrVcD0Kp
— Chris Anderson (@chr1sa) June 9, 2020

Good on @IBM to take this step and openly call out and oppose the used of tech for mass surveillance, racial profiling and the violation of human rights.

Timing could not be more perfect given what we have seen over the past week from cities like Seattle. https://t.co/qrk7t1JJ5q
— Carolina Milanesi (@caro_milanesi) June 8, 2020

While some companies think it’s enough to tweet support for social justice while marketing a tool for oppression, IBM gets out of the facial recognition business & states opposition to mass surveillance & racial profiling. https://t.co/50wGBnYZqL
— Evan Selinger (@EvanSelinger) June 9, 2020

Pretty amazing announcement from IBM today on halting facial recognition as a service and starting a national dialogue. https://t.co/sNz4spuCGl pic.twitter.com/eXjlFhxVd8
— Jed Bracy (@JedBracy) June 9, 2020

Wow this is big news. This is the type of change & action we want to see. https://t.co/r8z3UhOObj
— Grace ☀️ #BLACKLIVESMATTER (@GraceMacjones) June 9, 2020

【?生意係可以有道德咁做嘅！? 】
IBM停止面容辨識技術業務，指涉及偏見及不平等效果。

IBM exits facial recognition business, calls for police reformhttps://t.co/NnWATPN3Hf

IBM ends all facial recognition business as CEO calls out bias and inequalityhttps://t.co/QHGQbJKJja
— Charles Mok 莫乃光 (@charlesmok) June 9, 2020

“IBM firmly opposes and will not condone uses of any technology, including facial recognition technology offered by other vendors, for mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of basic human rights and freedoms.” https://t.co/QA4Lp4srpO
— RK Jackson | Atlanta ? (@theerkj) June 9, 2020

IBM ends all facial recognition business as CEO calls out bias and inequality – TechCrunch https://t.co/FWIeHUNVt2
— Kim Vu (she/her) (@kimmilyn) June 9, 2020

MAJOR! “IBM ends all facial recognition business as CEO calls out bias and inequality” https://t.co/Z4WByooTuf
— Angela Benton (@ABenton) June 9, 2020

Yes! Applause, Applause IBM! Hopefully others will follow: IBM ends all facial recognition business as CEO calls out bias and inequality | TechCrunch https://t.co/21tFV5nf9Y
— Ann Cavoukian, Ph.D. (@AnnCavoukian) June 9, 2020

IBM ends all facial recognition business as CEO calls out bias and inequality | TechCrunch. <seems a big move to me ... https://t.co/IwiVW93Gxc
— Richard Sambrook (@sambrook) June 9, 2020

And today, in headlines I did not see coming... ??‼️https://t.co/qGmazpwx1n
— Liz O’Sullivan (@lizjosullivan) June 9, 2020

What was that about what protests and demonstrations won't do?! https://t.co/rRuwLtUPHL
— Brenda D Wilkerson (@BrendaDardenW) June 9, 2020

This @verge article links to the ACLU demo on Amazon (inspired by Gender Shades), the NIST study (which cites "Actionable Auditing", Gender Shades follow up) and does NOT mention Gender Shades itself?! https://t.co/7GgUdV6gH0 @TechCrunch equally guilty: https://t.co/L9fmmcNH0F
— Deb Raji (@rajiinio) June 9, 2020

Nice to IBM facial recognition canned. Did you know that a number of Ethiopian women computer researchers have been working hard to highlight the ethical issues? Follow @timnitGebru @Abebab and others. Cite them and give them their dues https://t.co/blTkc7vBTs
— Yodit Stanton (@yoditstanton) June 9, 2020

IBM ends all facial recognition business as CEO calls out bias and inequality | TechCrunch https://t.co/kg23sxA698
— Ⓜ️✖️ ?️‍? ???(she/they) (@cheapwebmonkey) June 9, 2020

IBM ends all facial recognition business as CEO calls out bias and inequality https://t.co/jBKyw4jkcN
— Antonio French (@AntonioFrench) June 9, 2020

When your tech can be weaponized by law enforcement for racial profiling and mass surveillance, GET OUT OF THAT BUSINESS. https://t.co/pwSLEuHpSz
— Josh Clark (@bigmediumjosh) June 9, 2020

Call for important discussion on facial recognition bias and inequalityhttps://t.co/px4QflLjzF
— Chris Wright (@kernelcdub) June 9, 2020

Breaking: IBM is exiting the face recognition business https://t.co/6xddXCKVyR tip @techmeme
— Ina Fried (@inafried) June 8, 2020

IBM is exiting the face recognition business https://t.co/8IPVU7riY3
— Sumit Gupta (@SumitGup) June 8, 2020

In a letter to members of Congress on Monday, IBM said it is exiting the general-purpose facial recognition business and said it opposes the use of such technology for mass surveillance and racial profiling <general purpose’. https://t.co/fOKgw6AoOX
— Privacy Matters (@PrivacyMatters) June 9, 2020

IBM has notified Congress that it's exiting the general-purpose facial recognition business and said it opposes the use of such technology for mass surveillance and racial profiling https://t.co/uQA0RLLwAM
— Axios (@axios) June 8, 2020

Fascinating move from IBM https://t.co/7Wg1dn0IDH
— polite.one (@morepolite) June 9, 2020

IBM is exiting the face recognition business and is seeking actions and reform to minimize racial profiling in technology used in law enforcement. https://t.co/Rwj5tX3DFo
— Jake Kitchener (@kitch) June 9, 2020

IBM is exiting the face recognition business - Axios https://t.co/MIxs2tUo4x
— Transhumanism Australia ? (@transhumanismAU) June 9, 2020

そもそも敢えて名言するほどプレゼンスないように思うけど、Arvind Krishnaはhybrid cloud路線の継続が基本路線なのかなhttps://t.co/xlZrP1gA2A
— touya (@touya_huji) June 9, 2020

IBM is exiting the general-purpose facial recognition business, and said it opposes the use of such technology for mass surveillance and racial profiling ??? https://t.co/dZEl2YXSfy
— Simen Sommerfeldt (@sisomm) June 9, 2020

"IBM firmly opposes and will not condone uses....for mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of basic human rights and freedoms, or any purpose which is not consistent with our values and Principles of Trust and Transparency." https://t.co/3ipQIOc3DL
— Kate Brodock (@Just_Kate) June 9, 2020

Good, this : #IBM quits #facialrecognition market over police #racialprofiling concerns CEO writes to US Congress calling for ‘national dialogue’ about use in law enforcement.https://t.co/Xo7ezweuwl pic.twitter.com/6aSkiP21Dm
— John O'Connell (@jdpoc) June 9, 2020

IBM quits facial-recognition market over police racial-profiling concerns https://t.co/pxjpNtEyVX Every tech company should put out their statement on their tech's use for "mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of basic human rights and freedoms".
— Bruce Lawson, Antifa. Black Lives Matter. (@brucel) June 9, 2020

IBM quits facial-recognition market over police racial-profiling concerns https://t.co/hffBfV43q6
— Asher Wolf (@Asher_Wolf) June 9, 2020

IBM quits facial-recognition market over police racial-profiling concerns#corporatesocialresponsibility https://t.co/Wh3Qn0YlpX
— CAGE (@UK_CAGE) June 9, 2020

IBM pulls out of facial recognition, fearing racial profiling and mass surveillance https://t.co/i0KhUCrzAM . Well done IBM
— Harish asks you to wear a mask (@harishvasudevan) June 9, 2020

Holy shit. LEGITIMATELY huge news. IBM, one of the leading developers & manufacturers of facial recognition tech SPECIFICALLY FOR police & military partnerships "will no longer offer, develop, or research" facial rec tech & is advocating for police reform: https://t.co/UyuB4ZKCWn
— Damien is just so effing exhausted. (@Wolven) June 9, 2020

“IBM firmly opposes and will not condone uses of any [facial recognition] technology, including facial recognition technology offered by other vendors, for mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of basic human rights & freedoms”

This feels big.https://t.co/wRV16QIjQT
— Pomp ? (@APompliano) June 9, 2020

IBM will no longer offer, develop, or research facial recognition technology https://t.co/g1459N3YAi pic.twitter.com/y1PWbGTIzg
— The Verge (@verge) June 9, 2020

‘IBM will no longer offer, develop, or research facial recognition technology’ https://t.co/U1wA6uAPv6
— ✨ (@hamidtasnuva) June 9, 2020

Using facial recognition software as mass-surveillance for law enforcement is a dangerous violation of human rights that could further racial bias.

This is positive news from @IBM.

Now @amazon should follow their lead. https://t.co/PVtfVqDJXK
— Julián Castro (@JulianCastro) June 9, 2020

We will need more companies to follow: https://t.co/FY6fF2sgrd
— Circuits & ☕?️‍? (@Circuits_Coffee) June 9, 2020

“IBM firmly opposes and will not condone uses of any [facial recognition] technology, including facial recognition technology offered by other vendors, for mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of basic human rights and freedoms“ https://t.co/lIu3Kug3ex
— Alondra Nelson (@alondra) June 9, 2020

While some companies think it’s enough to tweet support for social justice while marketing a tool for oppression, IBM gets out of the facial recognition business & states opposition to mass surveillance & racial profiling. https://t.co/50wGBnYZqL
— Evan Selinger (@EvanSelinger) June 9, 2020

“We believe now is the time to begin a national dialogue on whether and how facial recognition technology should be employed by domestic law enforcement agencies.” https://t.co/skmzCdXLRE
— Jason Haddix (@doctor_eon) June 9, 2020

IBM will no longer offer, develop, or research facial recognition technology https://t.co/4PwJtuTd0H via @Verge
— UKBlackTech (@UKBlackTech) June 9, 2020

Be cautious. Be skeptical. But read the whole letter and HOLD THEM TO IT. Again: Arguably THE biggest, longest lasting name in Facial Rec said "No, we won't do it, it's bad."

That's huge.https://t.co/7mO84cS1oC
— Damien is just so effing exhausted. (@Wolven) June 9, 2020

Strong statement from our IBM CEO @ArvindKrishna on policy proposals to advance racial equality - in the US, but everywhere https://t.co/InW1EYLyR0 #AI #inclusiveIBM #proudIBMer @ThilakMahendran @Dale_DavisJones @norbert_janzen
— Andrea Martin (@amartin171) June 9, 2020

Today #IBM CEO @ArvindKrishna urged Congress to act on policy changes to advance racial justice & announced a sunset of facial recognition products, kickstarting a discussion on the role of tech in law enforcement. More here: https://t.co/13GcDvNttT pic.twitter.com/iEqZErQnBn
— Christopher Padilla (@ChrisPadilla00) June 8, 2020

?IBM will no longer develop or sell facial recognition tech to law enforcement.

Companies are now literally banning their own facial recognition products.

That’s how dangerous FR is.

Time for @pritipatel @kitmalthouse to #BanFacialRecognition NOW!https://t.co/VTKDOtk0uy
— Big Brother Watch (@BigBrotherWatch) June 9, 2020

this letter to congress from @IBM CEO @ArvindKrishna is worth reading in full. https://t.co/KEixTlog3l
— enough is enough (@monkchips) June 9, 2020

IBM CEO’s Letter to Congress on Racial Justice Reform #BlackLivesMatter https://t.co/uWYLg1C1h7
— Felipe Borges (@felipeborges) June 9, 2020

IBM CEO's Letter to Congress: “IBM firmly opposes and will not condone uses of any technology, including facial recognition technology offered by other vendors, for mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of basic human rights and freedoms”* https://t.co/C01PG1pYkW
— Ryan Heath (@PoliticoRyan) June 9, 2020

This is an impressive move by @IBM and deserves commendation from those of us who work with big data and machine learning. These are concrete steps toward racial justice and equity by a practitioner in the field. https://t.co/bRkGAVg9rC.
— Mike Olson (@mikeolson) June 9, 2020

IBM gets out of the facial recognition business, denounces the use of facial recognition for mass surveillance and racial profiling (which should be a no-brainer, but apparently that needs to be said)https://t.co/G5VKi7IuIo
— Ed Heil (Eĉjo Hajl') (@edheil) June 9, 2020

IBM will no longer offer, develop, or research facial recognition technology—CEO @ArvindKrishna says we should reevaluate selling the technology to law enforcement | via @verge h/t @AidanPeppin #ResponsibleAI https://t.co/Bkwd2TcbWf
— Rob McCargow #CogX2020 (@RobMcCargow) June 9, 2020

IBM has announced that selling facial recognition technology (FRT) to law enforcement should be re-evaluated.
1/nhttps://t.co/HLSQZFj5Om
— Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) (@internetfreedom) June 9, 2020

IBM Will No Longer Offer, Develop, or Research #FacialRecognition Technology

? @IBM’s CEO says we should reevaluate selling the technology to law enforcementhttps://t.co/Ozy925eQmz pic.twitter.com/nXLSbpZetr
— Marsha Collier (@MarshaCollier) June 9, 2020

NEW: IBM will no longer offer, develop, or research facial recognition technology

IBM’s CEO says we should reevaluate selling the technology to law enforcementhttps://t.co/sJDUe0kvOQ
— Travis Akers (@travisakers) June 9, 2020

IBM will no longer offer, develop, or research facial recognition technology

IBM will no longer offer general purpose facial recognition or analysis software, IBM CEO Arvind Krishna said in a letter to Congress today.

go ethics! yay Arvind Krishna.https://t.co/hf2vaMYpt0
— Sridhar Venkatapuram (@sridhartweet) June 9, 2020

@jaypeters ??‍♀️ how is it possible that your article doesn’t reference the foremost research revealing racial/gender bias in facial recognition? @AJLUnited, @jovialjoy, @timnitGebru? IBM will no longer offer, develop or research facial recognition technology https://t.co/5ZWwEqms8A
— Ayori Selassie ✊? (@iAyori) June 9, 2020

Important move by @ArvindKrishna at @IBM https://t.co/rzVJYp8Q1e
— Bret Taylor (@btaylor) June 9, 2020

IBM will no longer offer, develop, or research facial recognition technology #EmergingTech #facialrecognition #VirtualReality #VR #AugmentedReality #AR #DigitalTransformation #CyberSecurity #cyber #IBM #tech #ArtificialIntelligence #AI https://t.co/EZuUviN83g via @Verge
— Dr. Marcell Vollmer #StayHome #StaySafe (@mvollmer1) June 9, 2020

IBM, 더 이상 얼굴인식 기술 제공/개발/연구하지 않을 것
- CEO, 이 기술을 사법집행기관에 파는 것 재평가해야 한다고 말해
- Rekognition, Clearview AI 같은 얼굴인식 소프트웨어, 인종 편견과 프라이버시 염려 포함 문제들로 조사받고 있어https://t.co/s4JDq95WeU
— Wan Ki Choi (@wkchoi) June 9, 2020

IBM will no longer offer, develop, or research facial recognition technology. IBM’s CEO says we should re-evaluate selling the technology to law enforcement. https://t.co/Mj589yU4bh
— Roy Eacups (@RoyEacups) June 9, 2020

permanent link

Open Wiki - Feel free to edit it. -

6/10 '20 answered

Well done @IBM, what a strong choice ?????https://t.co/EtqiJaS1CH
— Guillaume? (@glours) June 9, 2020

#IBM ends all #facialrecognition business as CEO calls out bias and inequality | TechCrunch https://t.co/OkqYZoHi2R
— StefanPfeiffer (@Digitalnaiv) June 10, 2020

IBM CEO Arvind Krishna announced today that the company would no longer sell #FacialRecognition services, calling for a “national dialogue” on whether it should be used at all.#AI #bias #inequality
https://t.co/VdkgidkjBL pic.twitter.com/tgJ4ht3kUR
— Christophe Tricot (@ctricot) June 9, 2020

Well Ok... so @Amazon your turn. How much more money do you need at our expense? ....... IBM ends all facial recognition business as CEO calls out bias and inequality – TechCrunch https://t.co/lTgT49fy4n
— Rashad Robinson (@rashadrobinson) June 9, 2020

IBM ends all facial recognition business as CEO calls out bias and inequality:
"Vendors and users of Al systems have a shared responsibility to ensure that Al is tested for bias."#AI #Ethics #Bias
cc @MiaD @NoelleSilver_ @SpirosMargaris @pierrepinna https://t.co/U2iaAWTlkB pic.twitter.com/9PGRgSA5Rw
— Theo - 劉䂀曼 (@psb_dc) June 9, 2020

https://t.co/963qslOHMo this, and US cities banning it from law enforcement. Can we think more on it before implementing this tech in Africa? @ID4Africa @GoodID @cis_india @OmidyarNetwork @IDRC_CRDI @StrathCIPIT @bantigito
— Isaac Rutenberg (@iruten) June 9, 2020

IBM ends all facial recognition business as CEO calls out bias and inequality – TechCrunch https://t.co/2mOxfSJtnL
— Adam Miller (@TheMaxamillion) June 9, 2020

IBM gets out of facial recog and questions whether it should ever be used at all: https://t.co/sCUTMuNEgr
— Alice Taylor (@wonderlandblog) June 9, 2020

#IBM ENDS all#FACiAL #RECOGNiTiON work as #CEO calls out bias ,,,#TechCrunch https://t.co/W15Pob5RNw

by
Devin C#bigdata #USA #canada #london #japan #FemTech #womenWhoCode #UK #Women #dataScientist #dataScience #Linux #FRENCHtech #100daysofCode #RStats #Javascript #France
— Chidambara .ML. (@chidambara09) June 9, 2020

??? Kudos to @IBM and I hope others do the same

IBM said it is exiting the general-purpose facial recognition business and said it opposes the use of such technology for mass surveillance and racial profilinghttps://t.co/llOAYVmOdw #AI via @SumitGup
— HPC Guru (@HPC_Guru) June 8, 2020

Well, I didn’t expect this:

IBM quits facial-recognition market over police racial-profiling concernshttps://t.co/xmsaid89w3
— Thomas LaRock (@SQLRockstar) June 9, 2020

.@IBM will no longer offer, develop, or research #facialrecognition technology ~ Calls for #PoliceReform https://t.co/gKWmUsh1Gv #AI #LawEnforcement #RacialJustice @Droit_IA @CEO_AISOMA @ipfconline1 @jblefevre60 @labordeolivier @Xbond49 @Nicochan33 @Paula_Piccard @gvalan @rwang0
— Shi ? #StayAtHome #StayStrong #StayHealthy? (@ShiCooks) June 10, 2020

Facial recognition software esp in law enforcement has a very problematic racial bias. So this from @IBM is huge, the kind of tangible change due to recent events that tries to address systemic racism. It deserves more headlines than tweets and IG posts.https://t.co/cVZxkzViS0
— Shelina Janmohamed (@loveinheadscarf) June 9, 2020

IBM ends all facial recognition work as CEO calls out bias and inequality.

Ada research highlights public resistance to #facialrecognition and recent events amplify this outcry.

It seems tech companies are listening: https://t.co/Et5AC070IH @verge
— Ada Lovelace Institute (@AdaLovelaceInst) June 9, 2020

IBM stops developing or selling facial recognition software due to concerns the technology is used to promote racism https://t.co/yGBGXAAeA1 #gesichtserkennung
— CCC Updates (@chaosupdates) June 9, 2020

IBM says it is no longer working on face recognition because it’s used for racial profiling https://t.co/WZLMT45d0v
— Pablo #YoApruebo (@pabloviollier) June 9, 2020

IBM will not use / develop / sell facial recognition technologies to avoid biases#datascience #pafow # #peopleanalytics #futureofwork #workplace #MachineLearning #AI #artificialintelligence https://t.co/r4tnpgqlpQ https://t.co/o5Xb4u2irn
— Andres Bianchi (@abianchi) June 9, 2020

Read IBM’s letter to U.S. lawmakers about the change: https://t.co/T08f8qTdSD pic.twitter.com/CDmXIspRZE
— Doha Debates (@DohaDebates) June 9, 2020

This is huge, and promising, but also…

I’m sorry for my cynicism, I truly truly am, but this is worded in such a way that police tech is only bad when they say it’s bad but also sometimes police AI is good. Which. ?https://t.co/EoJYfnkTzl
— Aki the Conqueror ? (@gesa) June 9, 2020

permanent link

Reply with curations

Related

Featured